Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年使用抗抑郁药:急性治疗中疗效、耐受性和自杀倾向的荟萃综述

Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: Meta-Review of Efficacy, Tolerability and Suicidality in Acute Treatment.

作者信息

Boaden Katharine, Tomlinson Anneka, Cortese Samuele, Cipriani Andrea

机构信息

Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 2;11:717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00717. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Antidepressants are prescribed for the treatment of a number of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, however there is still controversy about whether they should be used in this population. This meta-review aimed to assess the effects of antidepressants for the acute treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders (ADs), autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), enuresis, major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents. Efficacy was measured as response to treatment (either as mean overall change in symptoms or as a dichotomous outcome) and tolerability was measured as the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events. Suicidality was measured as suicidal ideation, behavior (including suicide attempts) and completed suicide. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched (until 31 October 2019) for existing systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of double-blind randomized controlled trials. The quality of the included reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Our meta-review included nine systematic reviews/meta-analyses (2 on ADHD; 1 on AD; 2 on ASD; 1 on enuresis; 1 on MDD, 1 on OCD and 1 on PTSD). In terms of efficacy this review found that, compared to placebo: fluoxetine was more efficacious in the treatment of MDD, fluvoxamine and paroxetine were better in the treatment of AD; fluoxetine and sertraline were more efficacious in the treatment of OCD; bupropion and desipramine improved clinician and teacher-rated ADHD symptoms; clomipramine and tianeptine were superior on some of the core symptoms of ASD; and no antidepressant was more efficacious for PTSD and enuresis. With regard to tolerability: imipramine, venlafaxine, and duloxetine were less well tolerated in MDD; no differences were found for any of the antidepressants in the treatment of anxiety disorders (ADs), ADHD, and PTSD; tianeptine and citalopram, but not clomipramine, were less well tolerated in children and adolescents with ASD. For suicidal behavior/ideation, venlafaxine (in MDD) and paroxetine (in AD) were associated with a significantly increased risk; by contrast, sertraline (in AD) was associated with a reduced risk. The majority of included systematic reviews/meta-analyses were rated as being of high or moderate in quality by the AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool (one and five, respectively). One included study was of low quality and two were of critically low quality. Compared to placebo, selected antidepressants can be efficacious in the acute treatment of some common psychiatric disorders, although statistically significant differences do not always translate into clinically significant results. Little information was available about tolerability of antidepressants in RCTs of OCD and in the treatment of ADHD, ASD, MDD, and PTSD. There is a paucity of data on suicidal ideation/behavior, but paroxetine may increase the risk of suicidality in the treatment of AD and venlafaxine for MDD. Findings from this review must be considered in light of potential limitations, such as the lack of comparative information about many antidepressants, the short-term outcomes and the quality of the available evidence.

摘要

抗抑郁药被用于治疗儿童和青少年的多种精神疾病,然而对于是否应在这一人群中使用抗抑郁药仍存在争议。本荟萃综述旨在评估抗抑郁药对儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、焦虑症(ADs)、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、遗尿症、重度抑郁症(MDD)、强迫症(OCD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)急性治疗的效果。疗效通过治疗反应来衡量(以症状的总体平均变化或二分结果表示),耐受性则以因不良事件而停药的患者比例来衡量。自杀倾向通过自杀意念、行为(包括自杀未遂)和自杀完成情况来衡量。对PubMed、EMBASE和科学网进行了系统检索(截至2019年10月31日),以查找关于双盲随机对照试验的现有系统评价和/或荟萃分析。使用AMSTAR-2评估纳入综述的质量。我们的荟萃综述纳入了9项系统评价/荟萃分析(2项关于ADHD;1项关于AD;2项关于ASD;1项关于遗尿症;1项关于MDD,1项关于OCD和1项关于PTSD)。在疗效方面,本综述发现,与安慰剂相比:氟西汀在治疗MDD方面更有效,氟伏沙明和帕罗西汀在治疗AD方面效果更好;氟西汀和舍曲林在治疗OCD方面更有效;安非他酮和地昔帕明改善了临床医生和教师评定的ADHD症状;氯米帕明和噻奈普汀在ASD的一些核心症状方面更具优势;且没有抗抑郁药对PTSD和遗尿症更有效。在耐受性方面:丙咪嗪、文拉法辛和度洛西汀在MDD中的耐受性较差;在治疗焦虑症(ADs)、ADHD和PTSD时,未发现任何抗抑郁药之间存在差异;在患有ASD的儿童和青少年中,噻奈普汀和西酞普兰的耐受性较差,但氯米帕明并非如此。对于自杀行为/意念,文拉法辛(在MDD中)和帕罗西汀(在AD中)与风险显著增加相关;相比之下,舍曲林(在AD中)与风险降低相关。大多数纳入的系统评价/荟萃分析被AMSTAR-2批判性评价工具评为高质量或中等质量(分别为1项和5项)。1项纳入研究质量较低,2项质量极低。与安慰剂相比,某些抗抑郁药在一些常见精神疾病的急性治疗中可能有效,尽管统计学上的显著差异并不总是转化为临床上的显著结果。关于抗抑郁药在OCD随机对照试验以及ADHD、ASD、MDD和PTSD治疗中的耐受性信息很少。关于自杀意念/行为的数据匮乏,但帕罗西汀在治疗AD时可能会增加自杀风险,而文拉法辛在治疗MDD时可能会增加自杀风险。鉴于潜在的局限性,如缺乏许多抗抑郁药的比较信息、短期结果以及现有证据的质量等,必须考虑本综述的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8efd/7493620/5872297f8b5f/fpsyt-11-00717-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验