College of Global Business, Korea University, Sejong City, South Korea.
Psychol Rep. 2021 Oct;124(5):2327-2355. doi: 10.1177/0033294120959779. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
The current study aimed to develop a simplified version of the Korean Workaholism Scale (KOWS) by determining the reliability and validity of the Workaholism Analysis Questionnaire (WAQ) initially created by Aziz et al. The original scale of the WAQ was translated into Korean and then administered to 4,242 working people from a broad range of economic sectors. The nation-wide sample was a representative one from the 17th wave Korean Labor and Income Panel Study in 2014. The main body comprises two steps. First, through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) as well as a reliability analysis, along with content validity examination among experts, thirteen items from the original WAQ were eliminated. The EFA yielded a four-factor solution with four items established in compulsive dependency (CD), four in illusion of control (IC), four in endurance of conflicts (EC), and four in withdrawal symptoms (WS). This process provided a succinct and convenient measure of workaholism, the KOWS with 16 items. The reliability coefficient (α) of the new scale was .90, and the split-half reliability coefficient was .72. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed by way of structural equation modeling to validate the new construct. This KOWS showed adequate convergent validity (AVE > .5), construct reliability (CR > .7), as well as discriminant validity (AVE > ρ). Between four subscales of the KOWS and affective commitment (AC) to organizations there proved meager correlation. In conclusion, the KOWS with 16-item psychometric properties is a valid and reliable tool to measure workaholism in South Korea.
本研究旨在通过确定最初由 Aziz 等人创建的工作狂分析问卷(WAQ)的可靠性和有效性,来开发韩国工作狂量表(KOWS)的简化版本。WAQ 的原始量表被翻译成韩语,然后对来自广泛经济部门的 4242 名在职人员进行了测试。该全国性样本是 2014 年第 17 波韩国劳动力和收入面板研究的代表性样本。主体包括两个步骤。首先,通过探索性因素分析(EFA)以及可靠性分析,并结合专家的内容有效性检验,从原始 WAQ 中删除了 13 个项目。EFA 产生了一个四因素解决方案,其中包括四个在强制性依赖(CD)中的项目、四个在控制错觉(IC)中的项目、四个在冲突耐力(EC)中的项目和四个在戒断症状(WS)中的项目。这个过程提供了一个简洁方便的工作狂衡量工具,即 16 项的 KOWS。新量表的可靠性系数(α)为.90,分半可靠性系数为.72。其次,通过结构方程建模进行验证性因素分析(CFA),以验证新结构。该 KOWS 显示出足够的收敛有效性(AVE>.5)、构建可靠性(CR>.7)和区分有效性(AVE>ρ)。KOWS 的四个子量表与对组织的情感承诺(AC)之间的相关性较低。总之,具有 16 项心理测量特性的 KOWS 是一种有效的、可靠的工具,可用于衡量韩国的工作狂。