• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WAQ 分析:韩国式问卷的发展

A Critical Analysis of the WAQ: The Development of a Korean Form.

机构信息

College of Global Business, Korea University, Sejong City, South Korea.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2021 Oct;124(5):2327-2355. doi: 10.1177/0033294120959779. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1177/0033294120959779
PMID:32985356
Abstract

The current study aimed to develop a simplified version of the Korean Workaholism Scale (KOWS) by determining the reliability and validity of the Workaholism Analysis Questionnaire (WAQ) initially created by Aziz et al. The original scale of the WAQ was translated into Korean and then administered to 4,242 working people from a broad range of economic sectors. The nation-wide sample was a representative one from the 17th wave Korean Labor and Income Panel Study in 2014. The main body comprises two steps. First, through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) as well as a reliability analysis, along with content validity examination among experts, thirteen items from the original WAQ were eliminated. The EFA yielded a four-factor solution with four items established in compulsive dependency (CD), four in illusion of control (IC), four in endurance of conflicts (EC), and four in withdrawal symptoms (WS). This process provided a succinct and convenient measure of workaholism, the KOWS with 16 items. The reliability coefficient (α) of the new scale was .90, and the split-half reliability coefficient was .72. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed by way of structural equation modeling to validate the new construct. This KOWS showed adequate convergent validity (AVE > .5), construct reliability (CR > .7), as well as discriminant validity (AVE > ρ). Between four subscales of the KOWS and affective commitment (AC) to organizations there proved meager correlation. In conclusion, the KOWS with 16-item psychometric properties is a valid and reliable tool to measure workaholism in South Korea.

摘要

本研究旨在通过确定最初由 Aziz 等人创建的工作狂分析问卷(WAQ)的可靠性和有效性,来开发韩国工作狂量表(KOWS)的简化版本。WAQ 的原始量表被翻译成韩语,然后对来自广泛经济部门的 4242 名在职人员进行了测试。该全国性样本是 2014 年第 17 波韩国劳动力和收入面板研究的代表性样本。主体包括两个步骤。首先,通过探索性因素分析(EFA)以及可靠性分析,并结合专家的内容有效性检验,从原始 WAQ 中删除了 13 个项目。EFA 产生了一个四因素解决方案,其中包括四个在强制性依赖(CD)中的项目、四个在控制错觉(IC)中的项目、四个在冲突耐力(EC)中的项目和四个在戒断症状(WS)中的项目。这个过程提供了一个简洁方便的工作狂衡量工具,即 16 项的 KOWS。新量表的可靠性系数(α)为.90,分半可靠性系数为.72。其次,通过结构方程建模进行验证性因素分析(CFA),以验证新结构。该 KOWS 显示出足够的收敛有效性(AVE>.5)、构建可靠性(CR>.7)和区分有效性(AVE>ρ)。KOWS 的四个子量表与对组织的情感承诺(AC)之间的相关性较低。总之,具有 16 项心理测量特性的 KOWS 是一种有效的、可靠的工具,可用于衡量韩国的工作狂。

相似文献

1
A Critical Analysis of the WAQ: The Development of a Korean Form.WAQ 分析:韩国式问卷的发展
Psychol Rep. 2021 Oct;124(5):2327-2355. doi: 10.1177/0033294120959779. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
2
A psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses.护士循证实践问卷韩文版的心理测量学评估。
Contemp Nurse. 2014;49:4-14. doi: 10.5172/conu.2014.49.4.
3
A validation study of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire for the measurement of medical students' empathy.用于测量医学生同理心的多伦多同理心问卷韩文版的验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7.
4
Korean versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14, 10 and 4): psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic disease.感知压力量表(PSS - 14、10和4)的韩文版本:慢性病患者的心理测量学评估
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Mar;29(1):183-92. doi: 10.1111/scs.12131. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Suicidal Ideation Scale in mentally ill patients living in the community.社区精神病患者中韩文版自杀意念量表的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):210-216. doi: 10.1111/scs.12332. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Workaholism in Korea: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Differences.韩国的工作狂现象:患病率及社会人口统计学差异
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:569744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569744. eCollection 2020.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.
9
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) for individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者适用的韩语版肺康复自我效能适应性指数(PRAISE)的心理测量特性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 29;12:2611-2620. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S142488. eCollection 2017.
10
Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure.糖尿病自我护理活动量表韩国版的心理测量学特性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Mar;48(3):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Health Education Adherence Scale for Stroke Patients: a cross-sectional study.《脑卒中患者健康教育依从性量表的编制及信效度检验:一项横断面研究》
BMC Neurol. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02597-2.
2
Workaholism in Korea: Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Differences.韩国的工作狂现象:患病率及社会人口统计学差异
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:569744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569744. eCollection 2020.