Suppr超能文献

将伦理思维引入社会变革倡议:为什么这很重要。

Bringing ethical thinking to social change initiatives: Why it matters.

机构信息

Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University, Makerere University College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2021 Jun;16(6):882-894. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1820550. Epub 2020 Sep 27.

Abstract

Norms-shifting interventions (NSI) seek to improve people's well-being by facilitating the transformation of harmful social norms, the shared rules of acceptable actions in a group that prop up harmful health behaviours. Community-based NSI aim for incremental normative change and complement other social and behaviour change strategies, addressing gender, other inequalities, and the power structures that hold inequalities in place. Consequently, they demand that designers and implementers-many who are outsiders-grapple with power, history, and community agency operating in complicated social contexts. Ethical questions include whose voices and values, at which levels, should inform intervention design; who should be accountable for managing resistance that arises during implementation? As interest and funding for NSI increases in lower and middle-income countries, their potential to yield sustained change is balanced by unintentionally reinforcing inequities that violate human rights and social justice pillars guiding health promotion efforts. A review of 125 articles on ethical considerations in public health, social justice, and human rights-where NSI actions intersect-indicated little guidance on practice. To begin to address this gap, we propose ten ethical values and practical ways to engage ethically with the social complexities of NSI and the social change they seek, and a way forward.

摘要

规范转变干预(Norms-shifting Interventions,NSI)旨在通过促进有害社会规范的转变来改善人们的福祉,这些规范是群体中可接受行为的共同规则,支撑着有害的健康行为。基于社区的 NSI 旨在实现渐进式的规范变革,并补充其他社会和行为变革策略,解决性别和其他不平等问题,以及维持不平等现象的权力结构。因此,它们要求设计者和执行者(其中许多是局外人)应对复杂社会背景下的权力、历史和社区机构。伦理问题包括哪些人的声音和价值观,在哪个层面上,应该为干预设计提供信息;谁应该为实施过程中出现的抵制负责?随着 NSI 在中低收入国家的兴趣和资金的增加,它们产生持续变革的潜力与无意中强化侵犯人权和社会正义原则的不平等现象相平衡,这些原则是指导健康促进工作的支柱。对公共卫生、社会正义和人权领域(NSI 行动交叉的领域)中 125 篇关于伦理考虑的文章进行审查表明,实践中几乎没有指导。为了开始解决这一差距,我们提出了十个伦理价值观和切实可行的方法,以道德地参与 NSI 的社会复杂性及其寻求的社会变革,并提出了前进的道路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验