Ding Xuhui, Cai Zhongyao, Zhu Wei, Fu Zhu
School of Finance and Economics, Institute of Industrial Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China.
School of Business, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, Jiangsu, China.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;8(4):358. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040358.
Access to public health services is a cause that benefits the people and concerns the vital interests of the people. Everyone has access to basic health care services. The continuous improvement in people's health is an important indicator of the improvement in people's quality of life. This paper selects data from the European Union (EU) on aspects of public health expenditure, medical care resources, and government emergency coordination capacity from the period 2008 to 2017. Principal component analysis and factor analysis are used to measure their public health service capacity scores and conduct a comparative analysis. On this basis, the TOBIT model is adopted to explore the driving factors that lead to the spatial differentiation of public health service capabilities, and to combine it with the data of the COVID-19 epidemic as of 8 August 2020 from the official announcements of the World Health Organization and governments for further thinking. The results indicate that the public health service capacity of countries in the EU is showing a gradual increase. The capacity in Western Europe is, in turn, higher than that of Northern Europe, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe. In addition, the overall capacity in Western Europe is relatively high, but it is not balanced and stable, while Northern Europe has remained stable and balanced at a high level. Population density, degree of opening up, education level, economic development level, technological innovation level, and degree of aging have a positive effect on public health service capabilities. The level of urbanization has a negative effect on it. However, in countries with strong public health service capabilities, the epidemic of COVID-19 is more severe. The emergence of this paradox may be related to the detection capabilities of countries, the high probability of spreading thCOVID-19 epidemic, the inefficient implementation of government policy, the integrated system of the EU and the adverse selection of youth. This paper aims to improve the ability of the EU to respond to public health emergencies, improve the utilization of medical and health resources, and better protect people's health from the perspective of public health service capacity.
获得公共卫生服务是一项利民事业,关乎人民切身利益。人人享有基本医疗卫生服务。人民健康水平的不断提高是人民生活质量改善的重要指标。本文选取欧盟2008年至2017年期间公共卫生支出、医疗资源和政府应急协调能力等方面的数据,运用主成分分析和因子分析方法测度其公共卫生服务能力得分并进行比较分析。在此基础上,采用TOBIT模型探究导致公共卫生服务能力空间分异的驱动因素,并结合世界卫生组织及各国政府官方公布的截至2020年8月8日的新冠肺炎疫情数据作进一步思考。结果表明,欧盟国家的公共卫生服务能力呈逐步上升趋势。西欧地区的能力依次高于北欧、南欧和东欧地区。此外,西欧地区整体能力较高,但不均衡、不稳定,而北欧地区则在高水平上保持稳定和均衡。人口密度、开放程度、教育水平、经济发展水平、技术创新水平和老龄化程度对公共卫生服务能力有正向影响。城市化水平对其有负向影响。然而,公共卫生服务能力较强的国家,新冠肺炎疫情更为严峻。这一悖论的出现可能与各国的检测能力、新冠疫情传播的高概率、政府政策执行效率低下、欧盟一体化体系以及年轻人的逆向选择有关。本文旨在从公共卫生服务能力角度提高欧盟应对突发公共卫生事件的能力,提高医疗卫生资源利用效率,更好地保障人民健康。