• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生备灾逻辑模型:评估欧洲区域跨境威胁的备灾情况。

A Public Health Preparedness Logic Model: Assessing Preparedness for Cross-border Threats in the European Region.

出版信息

Health Secur. 2017 Sep/Oct;15(5):473-482. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0126.

DOI:10.1089/hs.2016.0126
PMID:29058967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750449/
Abstract

Improving preparedness in the European region requires a clear understanding of what European Union (EU) member states should be able to do, whether acting internally or in cooperation with each other or the EU and other multilateral organizations. We have developed a preparedness logic model that specifies the aims and objectives of public health preparedness, as well as the response capabilities and preparedness capacities needed to achieve them. The capabilities, which describe the ability to effectively use capacities to identify, characterize, and respond to emergencies, are organized into 5 categories. The first 3 categories-(1) assessment; (2) policy development, adaptation, and implementation; and (3) prevention and treatment services in the health sector-represent what the public health system must accomplish to respond effectively. The fourth and fifth categories represent a series of interrelated functions needed to ensure that the system fulfills its assessment, policy development, and prevention and treatment roles: (4) coordination and communication regards information sharing within the public health system, incident management, and leadership, and (5) emergency risk communication focuses on communication with the public. This model provides a framework for identifying what to measure in capacity inventories, exercises, critical incident analyses, and other approaches to assessing public health emergency preparedness, not how to measure them. Focusing on a common set of capacities and capabilities to measure allows for comparisons both over time and between member states, which can enhance learning and sharing results and help identify both strengths and areas for improvement of public health emergency preparedness in the EU.

摘要

提高欧洲区域的准备工作需要清楚了解欧盟成员国应该能够做些什么,无论是在内部采取行动,还是相互之间、与欧盟或其他多边组织合作。我们制定了一个准备工作逻辑模型,明确了公共卫生准备工作的目标和目的,以及为实现这些目标所需的应对能力和准备能力。这些能力描述了有效利用能力来识别、描述和应对紧急情况的能力,分为 5 类。前 3 类-(1)评估;(2)政策制定、调整和实施;以及(3)卫生部门的预防和治疗服务-代表公共卫生系统为有效应对必须完成的任务。第 4 类和第 5 类代表了一系列相互关联的功能,需要确保系统履行其评估、政策制定和预防与治疗作用:(4)协调与沟通涉及公共卫生系统内部的信息共享、事件管理和领导,以及(5)紧急风险沟通侧重于与公众的沟通。该模型为确定在能力清单、演习、重大事件分析和其他评估公共卫生应急准备的方法中要衡量的内容提供了一个框架,而不是如何衡量。重点关注一套共同的能力和能力进行衡量,既可以实现随时间的比较,也可以实现成员国之间的比较,这有助于加强学习和共享成果,并有助于确定欧盟公共卫生应急准备的优势和改进领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/caa6f5e540c6/fig-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/71fa42ffebea/fig-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/87b4f0ef4c42/fig-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/caa6f5e540c6/fig-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/71fa42ffebea/fig-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/87b4f0ef4c42/fig-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e6d/5750449/caa6f5e540c6/fig-3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Public Health Preparedness Logic Model: Assessing Preparedness for Cross-border Threats in the European Region.公共卫生备灾逻辑模型:评估欧洲区域跨境威胁的备灾情况。
Health Secur. 2017 Sep/Oct;15(5):473-482. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0126.
2
An Assessment of Coherence Between Early Warning and Response Systems and Serious Cross-Border Health Threats in the European Union and Turkey.欧盟和土耳其早期预警与应对系统与严重跨境健康威胁之间的连贯性评估
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Dec;10(6):883-892. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.63. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
Development of a public health emergency preparedness competency model for European Union countries.制定欧盟国家公共卫生应急准备能力模型。
Euro Surveill. 2018 Dec;23(49). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.48.1700631.
4
Public Health System Research in Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States (2009-2015): Actionable Knowledge Base.美国公共卫生应急准备中的公共卫生系统研究(2009 - 2015年):可操作知识库
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):e1-e6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304051.
5
Preparedness and response against diseases with epidemic potential in the European Union: a qualitative case study of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and poliomyelitis in five member states.欧盟针对具有流行潜力疾病的防范与应对:对五个成员国中东呼吸综合征(MERS)和脊髓灰质炎的定性案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3326-0.
6
Towards defining core principles of public health emergency preparedness: scoping review and Delphi consultation among European Union country experts.迈向确定公共卫生应急准备的核心原则:欧盟国家专家的范围界定审查和德尔菲咨询
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):1482. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09307-y.
7
Assessing and improving cross-border chemical incident preparedness and response across Europe.评估和改善整个欧洲的跨境化学事故应急准备和响应。
Environ Int. 2014 Nov;72:30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
Should a reformed system be prepared for public health emergencies, and what does that mean anyway?是否应该为突发公共卫生事件准备一个经过改革的系统,而这到底意味着什么呢?
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Winter;36(4):716-21, 609. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00327.x.
9
Ready, willing, and able: a framework for improving the public health emergency preparedness system.有备无患:完善突发公共卫生事件应急准备体系框架
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Jun;4(2):161-8. doi: 10.1001/dmp-v4n2-hcn10003.
10
European survey on decontamination in mass casualty incidents.欧洲大规模伤亡事件去污情况调查。
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 May-Jun;4(3):147-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesizing Public Health Preparedness Mechanisms for High-Impact Infectious Disease Threats: A Jurisdictional Scan.为应对高影响性传染病威胁整合公共卫生防范机制:辖区调查
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70019. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70019.
2
What makes health systems resilient? An analytical framework drawing on European learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic based on a multitiered approach.是什么让卫生系统具备韧性?一个基于多层次方法、借鉴欧洲在新冠疫情中的经验教训的分析框架。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;2(1):e000378. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000378. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
A narrative literature review to inform the development of a health threats preparedness framework in Ireland.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicating about risk: strategies for situations where public concern is high but the risk is low.关于风险的沟通:针对公众关注度高但风险低的情况的策略。
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Jan 15;27(1):2711709. doi: 10.17061/phrp2711709.
2
[Ebola alert: results and challenges in public health. A view from Catalonia (Spain)].[埃博拉警报:公共卫生领域的成果与挑战。来自西班牙加泰罗尼亚的视角]
Gac Sanit. 2017 Mar-Apr;31(2):161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
A public health emergency preparedness critical incident registry.
一篇叙述性文献综述,为爱尔兰健康威胁防范框架的制定提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;13:1490850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490850. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of digital device utilization on public health surveillance to enhance city resilience during the public health emergency response: A case study of SARS-CoV-2 response in Thailand (2020-2023).数字设备利用对公共卫生监测在突发公共卫生事件应对期间增强城市韧性的影响:以泰国应对SARS-CoV-2为例(2020 - 2023年)
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 7;11:20552076241304070. doi: 10.1177/20552076241304070. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
The European experience with testing and surveillance during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.欧洲在 COVID-19 大流行第一阶段的检测和监测经验。
Global Health. 2023 Jul 21;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00950-9.
6
The architecture of the European Union's pandemic preparedness and response policy framework.欧盟大流行病防范和应对政策框架的架构。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):42-48. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac154.
7
Development of a national health policy logic model to accelerate the integration of oncology and palliative care: a nationwide Delphi survey in Japan.制定国家卫生政策逻辑模型以加速肿瘤学和姑息治疗的整合:日本全国范围内的德尔菲调查。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep;27(9):1529-1542. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02201-0. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Modeling epidemic recovery: An expert elicitation on issues and approaches.建模疫情恢复:关于问题和方法的专家评估
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114554. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114554. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Assessing training needs in infectious disease management at major ports, airports and ground-crossings in Europe.评估欧洲主要港口、机场和陆路口岸的传染病管理培训需求。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11008-z.
10
Infectious Disease Emergency Specialist (IDES) Training Program in Japan: an innovative governmental challenge to respond to global public health emergencies.日本传染病应急专家(IDES)培训项目:政府应对全球突发公共卫生事件的一项创新举措。
Glob Health Med. 2020 Feb 29;2(1):44-47. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2019.01032.
一个公共卫生应急准备关键事件登记处。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):132-43. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0007.
4
What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature.我们从甲型H1N1流感大流行期间的沟通不平等中学到了什么:文献系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 21;14:484. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-484.
5
Communications in public health emergency preparedness: a systematic review of the literature.突发公共卫生事件应急准备中的沟通:文献系统综述
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Sep;11(3):170-84. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0038.
6
Data for preparedness metrics: legal, economic, and operational.准备指标数据:法律、经济和运营。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;19 Suppl 2(0 2):S22-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318295e8ef.
7
Measuring and assessing public health emergency preparedness.测量和评估突发公共卫生事件应急准备。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;19 Suppl 2:S16-21. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318294b0e3.
8
Is the reporting timeliness gap for avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks in global health surveillance systems associated with country transparency?全球卫生监测系统中禽流感和 H1N1 疫情报告及时性差距是否与国家透明度有关?
Global Health. 2013 Mar 25;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-14.
9
Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands.监测荷兰公众对政府信任度、风险认知度以及在甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间采取防护措施的意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 19;11:575. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-575.
10
Surveillance of perceptions, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of the Italian adult population (18-69 years) during the 2009-2010 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009-2010 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间意大利 18-69 岁成年人群的认知、知识、态度和行为监测。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;26(3):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9576-3. Epub 2011 Apr 8.