Chathukulam Jos, Tharamangalam Joseph
Ramakrishna Hegde Chair on Decentralization & Development, Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC) Bangalore, VKRV Rao Road, Nagarghavi PO, Bangalore 560 072, India.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount St. Vincent University, Halifax, NS B3M 2J6, Canada.
World Dev. 2021 Jan;137:105207. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105207. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
Kerala, a small state in South India, has been celebrated as a development model by scholars across the world for its exemplary achievements in human development and poverty reduction despite relatively low GDP growth. It was no surprise, then, that the Covid 19 pandemic that hit Kerala before any other part of India, became a test case for the Kerala model in dealing with such a crisis. Kerala was lauded across the world once again as a success story in containing this unprecedented pandemic, in treating those infected, and in making needed provisions for those adversely affected by the lockdown. But as it turned out, this celebration was premature as Kerala soon faced a third wave of Covid 19 infections. The objective of this paper is to examine Kerala's trajectory in achieving the success and then confronting the unanticipated reversal. It will examine the legacy of the Kerala model such as robust and decentralized institutions and provisions for healthcare, welfare and safety nets, and especially the capacity of a democratic state working in synergy with civil society and enjoying a high degree of consensus and public trust. It will then examine the new surge of the virus and attempts to establish if this was due to any mistakes made by the state or some deficits in its model of "public action" that includes adversarial politics having a disruptive tenor about it. We will conclude by arguing that the Kerala model is still relevant, and that it is still a model in motion.
喀拉拉邦是印度南部的一个小邦,尽管其国内生产总值增长相对较低,但在人类发展和减贫方面取得了堪称典范的成就,因而被世界各地的学者誉为一种发展模式。那么,毫不奇怪,在印度其他地区之前袭击喀拉拉邦的新冠疫情,成为了喀拉拉模式应对此类危机的一个测试案例。喀拉拉邦在控制这场前所未有的疫情、治疗感染者以及为受封锁不利影响的人们提供必要保障方面再次成为一个成功范例,受到了全世界的赞誉。但事实证明,这种赞誉为时过早,因为喀拉拉邦很快就面临了第三波新冠感染浪潮。本文的目的是审视喀拉拉邦取得成功以及随后面对意外逆转的轨迹。它将审视喀拉拉模式的遗产,如强大且分散的机构以及医疗保健、福利和安全网方面的保障措施,特别是一个与公民社会协同运作、享有高度共识和公众信任的民主邦的能力。然后,它将审视病毒的新一波激增,并试图确定这是否是由于该邦所犯的任何错误或其“公共行动”模式中的某些缺陷,其中包括具有破坏倾向的对抗性政治。我们将通过论证喀拉拉模式仍然具有相关性,并且它仍然是一个动态的模式来得出结论。