Mathew Jasmine, Joseph Shinto, Kuncheria Joseph
Department of Social Work, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous), Kochi-683 104, Kerala, India.
Global Health. 2025 Mar 27;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01098-4.
This paper presents a conceptual model for understanding cross-border precarity during the COVID-19 pandemic. It examines how public health emergencies exacerbate the challenges faced by expatriates and their families in cross-border contexts. The case study illustrates the complex nature of precarity, emphasising how its various forms like systemic, institutional, economic, health, social, and psychological are interacted and intensified during the pandemic, leading to lasting instability for expatriates that extends beyond borders and impacts their families. Findings indicate that restrictive immigration policies, delayed repatriation efforts, and inadequate support mechanisms exacerbated expatriates' hardships, which in turn amplified the economic and psychological strains faced by dependents in Kerala. This paper argues for integrating expatriate needs into the International Health Regulations (IHR) for managing public health emergencies, including comprehensive guidelines for repatriation and expatriate-inclusive country capacity assessments. This model serves as a tool to inform policymakers, social work practitioners, and public health professionals in designing interventions and policies that address the unique and intersecting forms of precarity in times of crisis, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive, transnational approach to public health resilience.
本文提出了一个概念模型,用于理解新冠疫情期间的跨境不稳定状况。它探讨了公共卫生突发事件如何加剧外派人员及其家庭在跨境环境中所面临的挑战。该案例研究阐明了不稳定状况的复杂性,强调了在疫情期间其各种形式,如系统性、制度性、经济性、健康、社会和心理方面是如何相互作用并加剧的,从而导致外派人员面临超越国界的持久不稳定,并影响到他们的家庭。研究结果表明,限制性移民政策、延迟的遣返工作以及支持机制不足加剧了外派人员的困境,进而放大了喀拉拉邦受抚养人所面临的经济和心理压力。本文主张将外派人员的需求纳入《国际卫生条例》(IHR)以应对公共卫生突发事件,包括遣返的全面指导方针和涵盖外派人员的国家能力评估。该模型可作为一种工具,为政策制定者、社会工作从业者和公共卫生专业人员提供参考,以设计应对危机时期独特且相互交织的不稳定形式的干预措施和政策,最终有助于形成一种更具包容性的跨国公共卫生复原力方法。