Suppr超能文献

黯淡的现在,光明的未来:二、偶发性未来思维和稀缺性对 2 型糖尿病高危成年人延迟折扣的综合影响。

Bleak present, bright future: II. Combined effects of episodic future thinking and scarcity on delay discounting in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, 1 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.

School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo Jacobs, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;44(2):222-230. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00178-7. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

The present study sought to determine if episodic future thinking (EFT) can decrease delay discounting (DD) and demand for fast food under simulations of economic scarcity in adults at risk for diabetes (i.e., overweight/obese and with hemoglobin A1c values in, or approaching, the prediabetic range). Across two sessions, participants completed assessments of DD and food demand at baseline and while prompted to: (1) engage in either EFT or control episodic recent thinking, and (2) while reading a brief narrative describing either economic scarcity or neutral income conditions. Results showed that EFT significantly reduced DD, whereas the economic scarcity narrative significantly increased DD; no significant interaction between EFT and scarcity was observed. No significant effect of either EFT or scarcity was observed on food demand. We conclude that EFT decreases DD even when challenged by simulated economic scarcity in adults at risk for diabetes. The absence of a significant interaction between EFT and scarcity suggests that these variables operate independently to influence DD in opposing directions. Effects of EFT and economic scarcity on food demand require further study. The present study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03664726).

摘要

本研究旨在确定情景性未来思维(EFT)是否可以减少糖尿病风险成年人(即超重/肥胖且血红蛋白 A1c 值处于或接近糖尿病前期范围)在经济匮乏情景下的延迟折扣(DD)和对快餐的需求。在两个阶段中,参与者在基线和被提示时完成了 DD 和食物需求的评估:(1)进行 EFT 或控制情景性近期思维,以及(2)阅读描述经济匮乏或中性收入条件的简短叙述。结果表明,EFT 显著降低了 DD,而经济匮乏叙述显著增加了 DD;EFT 和匮乏之间没有观察到显著的相互作用。EFT 或匮乏对食物需求均无显著影响。我们得出结论,即使在糖尿病风险成年人面临模拟经济匮乏的情况下,EFT 也能降低 DD。EFT 和匮乏之间没有显著的相互作用表明这些变量独立地以相反的方向影响 DD。EFT 和经济匮乏对食物需求的影响需要进一步研究。本研究已在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT03664726)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28a/7965228/0e227605df28/nihms-1633246-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.物质使用障碍中的人类奖励实验室模型。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Aug;241:173803. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173803. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验