• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community.为在社区中接受老年护理服务的老年人开发一种新的基于偏好的生活质量工具的维度。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02649-5. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol.为老年护理中的经济评估开发一种新的老年人生活质量工具:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e028647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647.
3
The integration of mixed methods data to develop the quality of life - aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument.整合混合方法数据以开发老年人护理消费者生活质量(QOL-ACC)工具。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02614-y.
4
An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people.在社区居住的老年人群体中对简明患者报告结局量表(OPQoL-Brief)、欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)和老年人综合照护评估工具(ASCOT)进行实证比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 30;13:164. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0357-7.
5
Developing a dementia-specific health state classification system for a new preference-based instrument AD-5D.为一种新的基于偏好的工具AD-5D开发特定于痴呆症的健康状态分类系统。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 25;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0585-0.
6
A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care.老年护理中经济评估结果测量工具的系统评价
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Nov 9;13:179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8.
7
How important is health status in defining quality of life for older people? An exploratory study of the views of older South Australians.健康状况在界定老年人生活质量方面有多重要?对南澳大利亚老年人群观点的探索性研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0068-3.
8
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
9
Toward the development of a vibrant, super-aged society: The future of medicine and society in Japan.迈向充满活力的超老龄社会:日本的医学与社会的未来。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14201. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Assessing feasibility, construct validity, and reliability of a new aged care-specific preference-based quality of life instrument: evidence from older Australians in residential aged care.评估一种新的老年护理特定偏好为基础的生活质量工具的可行性、结构有效性和可靠性:来自居住在老年护理机构的澳大利亚老年人的证据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 1;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02065-y.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for extending the health-related quality adjusted life year by combining instruments.一种通过整合工具来扩展与健康相关的质量调整生命年的框架。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 24;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02352-4.
2
A Protocol for Enhancing Allied Health Care for Older People in Residential Care: The EAHOP Intervention.一项加强养老院老年人联合健康护理的方案:EAHOP 干预措施。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;13(3):341. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030341.
3
Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives.老年护理机构中生活质量的常规测量:工作人员、居民及家属的观点
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):211-223. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Quality of life and quality of care experience in Australian residential aged care: a retrospective cohort study of 1,772 residents.澳大利亚老年护理机构中的生活质量与护理体验质量:一项对1772名居民的回顾性队列研究
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05472-6.
5
Reliability of the quality of life-aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) and EQ-5D-5L among older people using aged care services at home.居家养老服务使用者生命质量-养老消费者量表(QOL-ACC)和 EQ-5D-5L 的可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 May 30;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02257-8.
6
Examining interrater agreement between self-report and proxy-report responses for the quality of life-aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument.检查生活质量-老年护理消费者(QOL-ACC)工具的自我报告和代理报告回复之间的评分者间一致性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 4;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00705-z.
7
Quality of life and socio-demographic factors associated with nutritional risk in Brazilian community-dwelling individuals aged 80 and over: cluster analysis and ensemble methods.巴西80岁及以上社区居住个体的生活质量和与营养风险相关的社会人口因素:聚类分析和集成方法
Front Nutr. 2024 Jan 3;10:1183058. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1183058. eCollection 2023.
8
What Aspects of Quality of Life are Important from Palliative Care Patients' Perspectives? A Framework Analysis to Inform Preference-Based Measures for Palliative and End-of-Life Settings.从姑息治疗患者的角度来看,哪些方面的生活质量很重要?一个框架分析,为姑息治疗和生命终末期环境下的偏好测量提供信息。
Patient. 2024 Jan;17(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00651-w. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
9
What Quality-of-Life Dimensions Are Most Important to Older Adults from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds Receiving Aged Care Services? An Exploratory Study.对于接受老年护理服务的来自文化和语言背景多样的老年人来说,哪些生活质量维度最为重要?一项探索性研究。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;7(6):144. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7060144.
10
Assessing feasibility, construct validity, and reliability of a new aged care-specific preference-based quality of life instrument: evidence from older Australians in residential aged care.评估一种新的老年护理特定偏好为基础的生活质量工具的可行性、结构有效性和可靠性:来自居住在老年护理机构的澳大利亚老年人的证据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 1;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02065-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Aged care in Australia falls short.澳大利亚的老年护理服务存在不足。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32719-9.
2
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population.老年人通用偏好量表的发展与应用综述
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):781-801. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4.
3
Trends in the utilisation of aged care services in Australia, 2008-2016.澳大利亚 2008-2016 年老年护理服务利用趋势。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 6;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1209-9.
4
Economic evaluations in community aged care: a systematic review.社区老年护理中的经济评估:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3785-3.
5
Do capability and functioning differ? A study of U.K. survey responses.能力与机能有所不同吗?一项关于英国调查反馈的研究。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):465-479. doi: 10.1002/hec.3586. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
6
Where's the evidence? a systematic review of economic analyses of residential aged care infrastructure.证据何在?对老年住宅护理基础设施经济分析的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2165-8.
7
Advancing aged care: a systematic review of economic evaluations of workforce structures and care processes in a residential care setting.推进老年护理:对住宿式护理机构中劳动力结构和护理流程经济评估的系统评价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2016 Dec 12;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12962-016-0061-4. eCollection 2016.
8
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
9
Does one size fit all? Assessing the preferences of older and younger people for attributes of quality of life.一刀切是否可行?评估老年人和年轻人对生活质量属性的偏好。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1391-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Impact of consumer-directed care on quality of life in the community aged care sector.消费者导向型护理对社区老年护理领域生活质量的影响。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1399-1405. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12872. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

为在社区中接受老年护理服务的老年人开发一种新的基于偏好的生活质量工具的维度。

Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community.

机构信息

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02649-5. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-020-02649-5
PMID:32989683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7886721/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify the salient quality of life characteristics relevant to older people in receipt of community aged care services in order to develop dimensions for a draft descriptive system for a new preference-based quality of life instrument.

METHODS

Forty-one in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with older people (65 years and over) receiving community aged care services across three Australian states to explore quality of life characteristics of importance to them. The data were analysed using framework analysis to extract broader themes which were organised into a conceptual framework. The data were then summarised into a thematic chart to develop a framework matrix which was used to interpret and synthesise the data. Care was taken throughout to retain the language that older people had adopted during the interviews to ensure that appropriate language was used when identifying and developing the quality of life dimensions.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in the identification of five salient quality of life dimensions: independence, social connections, emotional well-being, mobility, and activities.

CONCLUSION

This research finds that quality of life for older people accessing aged care services goes beyond health-related quality of life and incorporates broader aspects that transcend health. The findings represent the first stage in a multiphase project working in partnership with older people to develop a new preference-based instrument of quality of life for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in community aged care. In future work, draft items will be developed from these dimensions and tested in face validity interviews before progressing to further psychometric testing.

摘要

目的

确定接受社区老年护理服务的老年人相关的主要生活质量特征,以便为新的基于偏好的生活质量工具的描述性系统草案开发维度。

方法

在澳大利亚三个州,对 41 名接受社区老年护理服务的老年人(65 岁及以上)进行了 41 次深入的半结构化访谈,以探讨对他们重要的生活质量特征。使用框架分析对数据进行分析,以提取更广泛的主题,并将其组织到概念框架中。然后将数据总结到主题图表中,以开发框架矩阵,用于解释和综合数据。在整个过程中,我们都注意保留老年人在访谈中使用的语言,以确保在识别和开发生活质量维度时使用适当的语言。

结果

分析结果确定了五个主要的生活质量维度:独立性、社会联系、情绪健康、流动性和活动。

结论

这项研究发现,接受老年护理服务的老年人的生活质量不仅仅是与健康相关的生活质量,还包含了更广泛的超越健康的方面。研究结果代表了与老年人合作开发新的基于偏好的生活质量工具的多阶段项目的第一阶段,该工具用于为社区老年护理的质量评估和经济评估提供信息。在未来的工作中,将从这些维度中开发草案项目,并在进行进一步的心理测量测试之前进行正面有效性访谈测试。