Suppr超能文献

国际湿疹理事会专家小组制定的慢性手部湿疹指南。

Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council.

机构信息

From the Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2021;32(5):319-326. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000659.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of chronic hand eczema (CHE) is complex and warrants standardization.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to guide clinicians on the assessment of CHE.

METHODS

An electronic questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and assessment of CHE was completed by councilors (n=45) of the International Eczema Council, an international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in CHE. The survey consisted of 52 statements for consensus.

RESULTS

Overall, nine statements (17.3%) had strong, twenty-three (44.2%) moderate, 12 (23.1%) low, and 8 (15.4%) very low levels of agreement. Five statements had considerable disagreement, including the value of conducting a skin biopsy (62.2% disagreement), investigating for possible type 1 reactions (60.0%), conducting a fungal culture (44.4%), finding no history of relevant allergens and/or irritants (31.1%) in most or all cases, and performing patch testing irrespective of lesion location and morphology (28.9%). Agreement was generally highest among respondents from Europe (28.6-77.8% agreement), followed by Asia (7.1%-35.7% agreement), North America (0%-35.5% agreement), and other (0%-13.3% agreement).

CONCLUSIONS

There were substantial differences of agreement, suggesting there are many knowledge and/or practice gaps with respect to CHE. Future research is needed to inform evidence-based and/or consensus guidelines for CHE.

摘要

背景

慢性手部湿疹(CHE)的评估较为复杂,需要标准化。

目的

为临床医生评估 CHE 提供指导。

方法

由国际湿疹理事会的顾问(n=45)完成了一份关于 CHE 诊断和评估的电子问卷,国际湿疹理事会是一个由 CHE 方面的临床医生和研究人员组成的国际团体,具有专长。该调查包括 52 项共识声明。

结果

总体而言,有 9 项声明(17.3%)具有强烈的一致性,23 项(44.2%)具有中度一致性,12 项(23.1%)具有低度一致性,8 项(15.4%)具有非常低度的一致性。有 5 项声明存在较大分歧,包括进行皮肤活检的价值(62.2%的人不同意)、调查可能的 1 型反应(60.0%)、进行真菌培养(44.4%)、在大多数或所有情况下均未发现相关变应原和/或刺激物的病史(31.1%)以及无论皮损位置和形态如何均进行斑贴试验(28.9%)。来自欧洲的受访者(28.6-77.8%的同意率)之间的一致性通常最高,其次是亚洲(7.1%-35.7%的同意率)、北美(0%-35.5%的同意率)和其他地区(0%-13.3%的同意率)。

结论

存在较大的一致性差异,这表明在 CHE 方面存在许多知识和/或实践差距。需要开展未来的研究,为 CHE 提供循证和/或共识指南。

相似文献

4
Hand eczema.手部湿疹。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1829-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1104084.
6
Management of chronic hand eczema.慢性手部湿疹的管理
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01179.x.
7
Redefining treatment options in chronic hand eczema (CHE).重新定义慢性手部湿疹(CHE)的治疗方案。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 May;24 Suppl 3:1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03615.x.
10
Chronic hand eczema: is IL-36α helpful in diagnosis and classification?慢性手部湿疹:白细胞介素-36α在诊断和分类中是否有帮助?
G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Dec;152(6):578-585. doi: 10.23736/S0392-0488.16.05312-8. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic hand eczema understanding has ramifications on clinical management.对慢性手部湿疹的认识会对临床管理产生影响。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Aug;34(8):e429-e430. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16375. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
5
Classification of hand eczema.手部湿疹的分类
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Dec;29(12):2417-22. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13308. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验