• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于视频的母婴健康为重点的戒烟干预措施在促进中国准爸爸戒烟方面的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a video-based smoking cessation intervention focusing on maternal and child health in promoting quitting among expectant fathers in China: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Shenzhen hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 29;17(9):e1003355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003355. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003355
PMID:32991589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secondhand smoke can cause adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet there is a lack of effective smoking cessation interventions targeted at expectant fathers. We examined the effectiveness of a video-based smoking cessation intervention focusing on maternal and child health in promoting quitting among expectant fathers.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A single-blind, 3-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the obstetrics registration centers of 3 tertiary public hospitals in 3 major cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Foshan) in China. Smoking expectant fathers who registered with their pregnant partners were invited to participate in this study. Between 14 August 2017 to 28 February 2018, 1,023 participants were randomized to a video (n = 333), text (n = 322), or control (n = 368) group. The video and text groups received videos or text messages on the risks of smoking for maternal and child health via instant messaging. The control group received a leaflet with information on smoking cessation. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome, by intention to treat (ITT), was validated abstinence from smoking at the 6-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence of abstinence (PPA) and level of readiness to quit at each follow-up. The mean age of participants was 32 years, and about half of them were first-time expectant fathers. About two-thirds of participants had completed tertiary education. The response rate was 79.7% (815 of 1,023) at 6 months. The video and text groups had higher rates of validated abstinence than the control group (video group: 22.5% [75 of 333], P < 0.001; text group: 14.9% [48 of 322], P = 0.02; control group: 9.2% [34 of 368]) with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of 2.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-4.37, P < 0.001) in the video group and 1.70 (95% CI: 1.06-2.74, P = 0.03) in the text group. The video and text groups differed in the rates of validated abstinence (22.5% versus 14.9%, P = 0.008; adjusted OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.10-2.46, P = 0.02). The video and text groups had higher rates of 7-day PPA than the control group at 6 months (video group: 24.6% [82 of 333] versus 11.4% [42 of 368], P < 0.001; text group: 17.4% [56 of 333] versus 11.4% [42 of 368], P = 0.02). The video and text groups also differed in the rates of 7-day PPA (24.6% versus 17.4%, P = 0.02). Excluding the quitters, the video and text groups had higher levels of readiness to quit than the control group at 6 months (video group: 43.5% [109 of 251] versus 31.6% [103 of 326], P = 0.002; text group: 40.6% [108 of 266] versus 31.6% [103 of 326], P = 0.01), No such difference was detected between the video and text groups (43.5% versus 40.6%, P = 0.29). The study was limited in that the long-term effectiveness of the intervention is uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

This smoking cessation intervention for expectant fathers that focused on explaining the ramifications of smoking on maternal and child health was effective and feasible in promoting quitting, and video messages were more effective than texts in delivering the information.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03236025.

摘要

背景

二手烟可导致不良妊娠结局,但针对准父亲的有效戒烟干预措施仍十分匮乏。我们旨在研究以母婴健康为重点的基于视频的戒烟干预措施对促进准父亲戒烟的效果。

方法和发现

这是一项在中国 3 个大城市(广州、深圳和佛山)的 3 家三级公立医院的产科登记中心进行的单盲、3 臂、随机对照试验。我们邀请登记了伴侣妊娠的吸烟准父亲参与本研究。2017 年 8 月 14 日至 2018 年 2 月 28 日,1023 名参与者被随机分为视频组(n=333)、短信组(n=322)或对照组(n=368)。视频组和短信组通过即时消息接收到有关母婴健康的吸烟风险的视频或短信。对照组则收到了一份关于戒烟的传单。在 1 周和 1、3、6 个月进行随访。主要结局(意向治疗,ITT)为 6 个月时验证的戒烟率。次要结局包括每个随访时的 7 天点戒烟率(PPA)和戒烟准备程度。参与者的平均年龄为 32 岁,约一半为首次准父亲。约三分之二的参与者完成了高等教育。6 个月时的应答率为 79.7%(815/1,023)。视频组和短信组的验证戒烟率高于对照组(视频组:22.5%[75/333],P<0.001;短信组:14.9%[48/322],P=0.02;对照组:9.2%[34/368]),调整后的优势比(OR)分别为 2.80(95%置信区间[CI]:1.79-4.37,P<0.001)和 1.70(95% CI:1.06-2.74,P=0.03)。视频组和短信组之间的验证戒烟率也存在差异(22.5%与 14.9%,P=0.008;调整后的 OR:1.64,95% CI:1.10-2.46,P=0.02)。视频组和短信组在 6 个月时的 7 天 PPA 高于对照组(视频组:24.6%[82/333]与 11.4%[42/368],P<0.001;短信组:17.4%[56/333]与 11.4%[42/368],P=0.02)。视频组和短信组之间的 7 天 PPA 也存在差异(24.6%与 17.4%,P=0.02)。排除戒烟者后,视频组和短信组在 6 个月时的戒烟准备程度高于对照组(视频组:43.5%[109/251]与 31.6%[103/326],P=0.002;短信组:40.6%[108/266]与 31.6%[103/326],P=0.01),但在视频组和短信组之间未检测到差异(43.5%与 40.6%,P=0.29)。该研究存在一定局限性,干预措施的长期效果尚不确定。

结论

该以母婴健康为重点的准父亲戒烟干预措施在促进戒烟方面是有效和可行的,且视频信息比短信更有效。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03236025。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ce/7523971/f18aac991db1/pmed.1003355.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ce/7523971/f18aac991db1/pmed.1003355.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5ce/7523971/f18aac991db1/pmed.1003355.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a video-based smoking cessation intervention focusing on maternal and child health in promoting quitting among expectant fathers in China: A randomized controlled trial.基于视频的母婴健康为重点的戒烟干预措施在促进中国准爸爸戒烟方面的效果:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 29;17(9):e1003355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003355. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Effectiveness of a text-messaging-based smoking cessation intervention ("Happy Quit") for smoking cessation in China: A randomized controlled trial.基于短信的戒烟干预(“快乐戒烟”)在中国戒烟中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002713. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Brief Advice, Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling, and Active Referral for Expectant Fathers Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.简短建议、尼古丁替代疗法抽样以及针对吸烟的准父亲的主动转介:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2757.
4
Assessment of a Text Message-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Adult Smokers in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于短信的戒烟干预措施对中国成年吸烟者的评估:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e230301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0301.
5
Association of smoking behavior among Chinese expectant fathers and smoking abstinence after their partner becomes pregnant: a cross-sectional study.中国准父亲吸烟行为与伴侣怀孕后戒烟行为的关联性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03148-8.
6
Comparing the Efficacy of an Identical, Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention Delivered by Mobile Text Messaging Versus Email: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较通过手机短信和电子邮件提供的相同定制戒烟干预措施的效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 27;7(9):e12137. doi: 10.2196/12137.
7
Comparison of text and video computer-tailored interventions for smoking cessation: randomized controlled trial.文本与视频计算机定制戒烟干预措施的比较:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 3;16(3):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3016.
8
Family-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smoking Fathers and Nonsmoking Mothers with a Child: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对有孩子的吸烟父亲和不吸烟母亲的基于家庭的戒烟干预:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:260-266.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
9
The efficacy of mobile phone-based text message interventions ('Happy Quit') for smoking cessation in China.基于手机短信干预措施(“快乐戒烟”)在中国戒烟方面的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3528-5.
10
Effect of a workplace mobile phone-based instant messaging intervention on smoking cessation: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.基于工作场所手机即时通讯干预对戒烟的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1758-1767. doi: 10.1111/add.15804. Epub 2022 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家戒烟的行为干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):575-585. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae259.
2
The Effect of Educational Videos Depicting The Impact of Smoking on Young Adults Smokers: A Qualitative Study.教育视频对年轻成年吸烟者吸烟影响的效果:定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Oct 1;25(10):3583-3588. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.10.3583.
3
Understanding the mechanisms of change in social norms around tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Brief Self-determination Theory-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smokers at Emergency Departments in Hong Kong: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于简短自我决定理论的戒烟干预措施对香港急诊科吸烟者的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):206-214. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5176.
2
Real-time video counselling for smoking cessation.戒烟的实时视频咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 29;2019(10):CD012659. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012659.pub2.
3
Comparison of two approaches in achieving smoking abstinence among patients in an outpatient clinic: A Phase 2 randomized controlled trial.
理解烟草使用社会规范的变化机制:干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):215-235. doi: 10.1111/add.16685. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
4
Effect of Adding Personalized Instant Messaging Apps to a Brief Smoking Cessation Model in Community Smokers in Hong Kong: Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.香港社区吸烟者中加入个性化即时通讯应用程序对简短戒烟模型的影响:实用随机临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 13;26:e44973. doi: 10.2196/44973.
5
Smoking cessation and relapse-prevention interventions tailored for expectant and new fathers: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis.针对预期父亲和新父亲的戒烟和防止复吸干预措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 6;13(10):e071745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071745.
6
Effectiveness of behavior change interventions for smoking cessation among expectant and new fathers: findings from a systematic review.期待父亲和新父亲戒烟行为改变干预措施的有效性:系统评价的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16713-5.
7
Effectiveness of eHealth Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康戒烟干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e45111. doi: 10.2196/45111.
8
Managing Technology, Content, and User Experience: An mHealth Intervention to Improve Women's Health Literacy after Incarceration.管理技术、内容和用户体验:一项改善女性出狱后健康素养的移动健康干预措施。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021 May;32(2 Suppl):106-127. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0053.
9
Utilization and Effectiveness of a Message-Based Tobacco Cessation Program (mCessation) in the Chinese General Population: Longitudinal, Real-world Study.基于信息的戒烟计划(mCessation)在普通中国人群中的使用情况和效果:纵向、真实世界研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 2;25:e44840. doi: 10.2196/44840.
10
Non-linear Relationship of Maternal Age With Risk of Spontaneous Abortion: A Case-Control Study in the China Birth Cohort.母亲年龄与自然流产风险的非线性关系:中国出生队列中的一项病例对照研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;10:933654. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.933654. eCollection 2022.
两种方法在门诊患者戒烟中效果的比较:一项 2 期随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 May;101(5):885-893. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Helping cancer patients quit smoking using brief advice based on risk communication: A randomized controlled trial.基于风险沟通的简短建议帮助癌症患者戒烟:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 9;8(1):2712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21207-1.
5
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.何时以及如何在随机临床试验中使用多重插补来处理缺失数据——附流程图的实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
6
Smoking in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in China.孕期吸烟:一项在中国的横断面研究。
Tob Induc Dis. 2017 Jul 24;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12971-017-0140-0. eCollection 2017.
7
Feasibility of biochemical verification in a web-based smoking cessation study.基于网络的戒烟研究中生化验证的可行性。
Addict Behav. 2017 Oct;73:204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content.有效的教育视频:从视频内容中最大化学生学习效果的原则与指南
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
9
What is the effectiveness of printed educational materials on primary care physician knowledge, behaviour, and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.印刷版教育材料对初级保健医生的知识、行为及患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 1;10:164. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0347-5.
10
Effectiveness of video- versus text-based computer-tailored smoking cessation interventions among smokers after one year.一年后,基于视频与基于文本的计算机定制戒烟干预措施对吸烟者的有效性。
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 11.