• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提前了解所需知识:支持主题和分类关系灵活语义检索的神经过程。

Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO10 5DD.

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO10 5DD.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117405. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117405
PMID:32992002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7779371/
Abstract

Semantic retrieval is flexible, allowing us to focus on subsets of features and associations that are relevant to the current task or context: for example, we use taxonomic relations to locate items in the supermarket (carrots are a vegetable), but thematic associations to decide which tools we need when cooking (carrot goes with peeler). We used fMRI to investigate the neural basis of this form of semantic flexibility; in particular, we asked how retrieval unfolds differently when participants have advanced knowledge of the type of link to retrieve between concepts (taxonomic or thematic). Participants performed a semantic relatedness judgement task: on half the trials, they were cued to search for a taxonomic or thematic link, while on the remaining trials, they judged relatedness without knowing which type of semantic relationship would be relevant. Left inferior frontal gyrus showed greater activation when participants knew the trial type in advance. An overlapping region showed a stronger response when the semantic relationship between the items was weaker, suggesting this structure supports both top-down and bottom-up forms of semantic control. Multivariate pattern analysis further revealed that the neural response in left inferior frontal gyrus reflects goal information related to different conceptual relationships. Top-down control specifically modulated the response in visual cortex: when the goal was unknown, there was greater deactivation to the first word, and greater activation to the second word. We conclude that top-down control of semantic retrieval is primarily achieved through the gating of task-relevant 'spoke' regions.

摘要

语义检索具有灵活性,可以使我们专注于与当前任务或上下文相关的特征和关联子集:例如,我们使用分类关系在超市中定位物品(胡萝卜是一种蔬菜),但使用主题关联来决定烹饪时需要哪些工具(胡萝卜需要削皮器)。我们使用 fMRI 研究了这种语义灵活性的神经基础;特别是,我们询问了当参与者对要在概念之间检索的链接类型(分类或主题)有了深入了解时,检索是如何以不同的方式展开的。参与者执行语义关联性判断任务:在一半的试验中,他们被提示搜索分类或主题链接,而在其余的试验中,他们在不知道哪种语义关系将相关的情况下判断关联性。当参与者提前知道试验类型时,左额下回显示出更大的激活。当项目之间的语义关系较弱时,重叠区域显示出更强的反应,这表明该结构支持自上而下和自下而上的语义控制形式。多元模式分析进一步表明,左额下回的神经反应反映了与不同概念关系相关的目标信息。自上而下的控制特别调节了视觉皮层的反应:当目标未知时,第一个词的去激活程度更大,第二个词的激活程度更大。我们得出结论,语义检索的自上而下控制主要是通过门控任务相关的“辐条”区域来实现的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/717806a511b5/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/ff201f893f32/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/f56c32fd3a50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/6b5affb22b10/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/85a05f7c9168/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/15d075e422fd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/8c03932a0e8f/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/e5cb2dd50521/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/717806a511b5/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/ff201f893f32/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/f56c32fd3a50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/6b5affb22b10/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/85a05f7c9168/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/15d075e422fd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/8c03932a0e8f/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/e5cb2dd50521/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/7779371/717806a511b5/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations.提前了解所需知识:支持主题和分类关系灵活语义检索的神经过程。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117405. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Dissociations in semantic cognition: Oscillatory evidence for opposing effects of semantic control and type of semantic relation in anterior and posterior temporal cortex.语义认知中的分离:前颞叶和后颞叶皮质中语义控制和语义关系类型的相反效应的振荡证据。
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Task-based and resting-state fMRI reveal compensatory network changes following damage to left inferior frontal gyrus.任务态和静息态 fMRI 揭示左额下回损伤后的补偿性网络变化。
Cortex. 2018 Feb;99:150-165. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
The structural basis of semantic control: Evidence from individual differences in cortical thickness.语义控制的结构基础:来自皮质厚度个体差异的证据。
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.044. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Automatic and Controlled Semantic Retrieval: TMS Reveals Distinct Contributions of Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus.自动与受控语义检索:经颅磁刺激揭示颞中回后部和角回的不同作用
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15230-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4705-14.2015.
6
Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.构建记忆:检索查询格式如何塑造记忆的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Both Default and Multiple-Demand Regions Represent Semantic Goal Information.默认网络和多重需求区域都代表语义目标信息。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3679-3691. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1782-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Controlled semantic cognition relies upon dynamic and flexible interactions between the executive 'semantic control' and hub-and-spoke 'semantic representation' systems.受控语义认知依赖于执行“语义控制”和枢纽-辐条“语义表示”系统之间的动态和灵活交互。
Cortex. 2018 Jun;103:100-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Semantic control deficits impair understanding of thematic relationships more than object identity.语义控制缺陷对主题关系的理解障碍甚于对物体身份的理解障碍。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Sep;104:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Attention to Distinct Goal-relevant Features Differentially Guides Semantic Knowledge Retrieval.对不同目标相关特征的关注以不同方式引导语义知识检索。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1178-1193. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01121. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Music Therapy on Neurodevelopment of Preterm Infants and Functional Improvement in Children with Neurological Deficits.音乐疗法对早产儿神经发育及神经功能缺陷儿童功能改善的影响。
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Mar 28;17(2):41. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17020041.
2
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of taxonomic and thematic processing of abstract and concrete word pairs.抽象词与具体词对的分类和主题处理的功能磁共振成像
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Sep;19(3):541-558. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12424. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions.

本文引用的文献

1
Reverse-engineering the cortical architecture for controlled semantic cognition.对皮质结构进行反向工程以实现可控语义认知。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):774-786. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01034-z. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Distinct patterns of thought mediate the link between brain functional connectomes and well-being.独特的思维模式介导了大脑功能连接组与幸福感之间的联系。
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;4(3):637-657. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00137. eCollection 2020.
3
Dissociations in semantic cognition: Oscillatory evidence for opposing effects of semantic control and type of semantic relation in anterior and posterior temporal cortex.
对不确定性的不耐受的个体差异主要与额下区域的结构有关。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jan 27. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01262-0.
4
The Dimensionality of Neural Coding for Cognitive Control Is Gradually Transformed within the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.认知控制的神经编码维度在外侧前额叶皮质内逐渐转变。
J Neurosci. 2025 Feb 5;45(6):e0233242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0233-24.2024.
5
Diverse Frontoparietal Connectivity Supports Semantic Prediction and Integration in Sentence Comprehension.多样的额顶叶连接支持句子理解中的语义预测和整合。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 29;45(5):e1404242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1404-24.2024.
6
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
7
A Rose by Any Other Name: Mapping Taxonomic and Thematic Naming Errors Poststroke.换个玫瑰名:中风后分类和主题命名错误的映射。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;36(10):2251-2267. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02236.
8
Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition.宏观脑状态支持语义认知的控制。
Commun Biol. 2024 Aug 1;7(1):926. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06630-7.
9
Hands off, brain off? A meta-analysis of neuroimaging data during active and passive driving.手放开,脑也放空?主动和被动驾驶时神经影像学数据的荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Dec;13(12):e3272. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3272. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
Bigram semantic distance as an index of continuous semantic flow in natural language: Theory, tools, and applications.双词语义距离作为自然语言中连续语义流的指标:理论、工具和应用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2578-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001389. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
语义认知中的分离:前颞叶和后颞叶皮质中语义控制和语义关系类型的相反效应的振荡证据。
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
Semantic knowledge influences whether novel episodic associations are represented symmetrically or asymmetrically.语义知识会影响新的情景联想是对称地还是非对称地被表示。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Nov;47(8):1567-1581. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00950-4.
5
Emotion and location cues bias conceptual retrieval in people with deficient semantic control.情绪和位置提示会影响语义控制不足的人的概念检索。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
6
Unveiling the dynamic interplay between the hub- and spoke-components of the brain's semantic system and its impact on human behaviour.揭示大脑语义系统的枢纽和辐辏组件之间的动态相互作用及其对人类行为的影响。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.059. Epub 2019 May 24.
7
Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex.当前和未来的目标在目标选择皮层中呈现出相反的模式。
Elife. 2018 Nov 6;7:e38677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38677.
8
Shared processes resolve competition within and between episodic and semantic memory: Evidence from patients with LIFG lesions.共享过程解决了情景记忆和语义记忆内部及之间的竞争:来自左侧额下回损伤患者的证据。
Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Imagining Sounds and Images: Decoding the Contribution of Unimodal and Transmodal Brain Regions to Semantic Retrieval in the Absence of Meaningful Input.想象声音和图像:解码单模态和跨模态大脑区域对无意义输入情况下语义检索的贡献。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Nov;31(11):1599-1616. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01330. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states.默认模式网络可以支持在主动任务状态下体验的细节水平。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9318-9323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721259115. Epub 2018 Aug 27.