Sarto Fabio, Cona Giorgia, Chiossi Francesco, Paoli Antonio, Bisiacchi Patrizia, Patron Elisabetta, Marcolin Giuseppe
School of Human Movement Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 16;8:e9765. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9765. eCollection 2020.
In sports, postural balance control has been demonstrated to be one of the limiting factors of performance and a necessary component to achieve any sport technique. Team players (TP) must process and react to multiple external stimuli while executing at the same time the skills of the game. By contrast, endurance athletes (END) must perform the same gesture repetitively without a concurrent coordination of continuous stimuli-related actions. However, END are used to facilitate their physical performance by adopting cognitive strategies while performing their sport gesture. Therefore, we aimed to investigate static and dynamic balance performance in these two types of athletes, both in single and dual-task conditions. Nineteen END and sixteen TP underwent a static and a dynamic balance assessment on a dynamometric platform and an instrumented oscillating board, respectively. Among TP static but not dynamic postural balance performance was negatively affected by dual-tasking considering the area of the confidence ellipse ( < 0.001; = 0.52) and the sway path mean speed ( < 0.001; = 0.93). Conversely, END unaltered static balance performance but showed an overall improvement in the dynamic one when dual-tasking occurred. The limited human processing capacity accounted the worsening of the cognitive performance in both TP ( < 0.05; = 0.22) and END ( < 0.001; = 0.37). Although TP are more used coping dual tasking, the better performance of END could be accounted for by the employment of the external attentive focus (i.e. counting backward aloud) that called into play a strategy close to those adopted during training and competitions. These surprising results should be considered when driving and developing new trainings for team players in dual-tasking conditions.
在体育运动中,姿势平衡控制已被证明是表现的限制因素之一,也是实现任何运动技术的必要组成部分。团队运动员(TP)在执行比赛技能的同时,必须处理并对多种外部刺激做出反应。相比之下,耐力运动员(END)必须重复执行相同的动作,而无需同时协调与持续刺激相关的动作。然而,END习惯于在执行运动动作时采用认知策略来提高他们的身体表现。因此,我们旨在研究这两种类型运动员在单任务和双任务条件下的静态和动态平衡表现。19名END和16名TP分别在测力平台和仪器化摆动板上进行了静态和动态平衡评估。在TP中,考虑到置信椭圆面积(<0.001;=0.52)和摇摆路径平均速度(<0.001;=0.93),双任务会对静态而非动态姿势平衡表现产生负面影响。相反,END的静态平衡表现未受影响,但在双任务时动态平衡表现总体有所改善。有限的人类处理能力导致了TP(<0.05;=0.22)和END(<0.001;=0.37)认知表现的恶化。尽管TP更习惯于应对双任务,但END更好的表现可能是由于采用了外部注意力焦点(即大声倒数),这发挥了一种与训练和比赛中采用的策略相近的策略。在为双任务条件下的团队运动员设计和开发新训练时,应考虑这些令人惊讶的结果。