Li Yize, Renner David M, Comar Courtney E, Whelan Jillian N, Reyes Hanako M, Cardenas-Diaz Fabian Leonardo, Truitt Rachel, Tan Li Hui, Dong Beihua, Alysandratos Konstantinos Dionysios, Huang Jessie, Palmer James N, Adappa Nithin D, Kohanski Michael A, Kotton Darrell N, Silverman Robert H, Yang Wenli, Morrisey Edward, Cohen Noam A, Weiss Susan R
bioRxiv. 2020 Nov 2:2020.09.24.312553. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.24.312553.
Coronaviruses are adept at evading host antiviral pathways induced by viral double-stranded RNA, including interferon (IFN) signaling, oligoadenylate synthetase-ribonuclease L (OAS-RNase L), and protein kinase R (PKR). While dysregulated or inadequate IFN responses have been associated with severe coronavirus infection, the extent to which the recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 activates or antagonizes these pathways is relatively unknown. We found that SARS-CoV-2 infects patient-derived nasal epithelial cells, present at the initial site of infection, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar type 2 cells (iAT2), the major cell type infected in the lung, and cardiomyocytes (iCM), consistent with cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19 disease. Robust activation of IFN or OAS-RNase L is not observed in these cell types, while PKR activation is evident in iAT2 and iCM. In SARS-CoV-2 infected Calu-3 and A549 lung-derived cell lines, IFN induction remains relatively weak; however activation of OAS-RNase L and PKR is observed. This is in contrast to MERS-CoV, which effectively inhibits IFN signaling as well as OAS-RNase L and PKR pathways, but similar to mutant MERS-CoV lacking innate immune antagonists. Remarkably, both OAS-RNase L and PKR are activated in knockout A549 cells, demonstrating that SARS-CoV-2 can induce these host antiviral pathways despite minimal IFN production. Moreover, increased replication and cytopathic effect in knockout A549 cells implicates OAS-RNase L in restricting SARS-CoV-2. Finally, while SARS-CoV-2 fails to antagonize these host defense pathways, which contrasts with other coronaviruses, the IFN signaling response is generally weak. These host-virus interactions may contribute to the unique pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.
SARS-CoV-2 emergence in late 2019 led to the COVID-19 pandemic that has had devastating effects on human health and the economy. Early innate immune responses are essential for protection against virus invasion. While inadequate innate immune responses are associated with severe COVID-19 diseases, understanding of the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with host antiviral pathways is minimal. We have characterized the innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infections in relevant respiratory tract derived cells and cardiomyocytes and found that SARS-CoV-2 activates two antiviral pathways, oligoadenylate synthetase-ribonuclease L (OAS-RNase L), and protein kinase R (PKR), while inducing minimal levels of interferon. This in contrast to MERS-CoV which inhibits all three pathways. Activation of these pathways may contribute to the distinctive pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.
冠状病毒善于逃避由病毒双链RNA诱导的宿主抗病毒途径,包括干扰素(IFN)信号传导、寡腺苷酸合成酶-核糖核酸酶L(OAS-RNase L)和蛋白激酶R(PKR)。虽然失调或不足的IFN反应与严重的冠状病毒感染有关,但最近出现的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)激活或拮抗这些途径的程度相对未知。我们发现,SARS-CoV-2感染患者来源的鼻上皮细胞(存在于感染的初始部位)、诱导多能干细胞来源的肺泡Ⅱ型细胞(iAT2,肺中主要的感染细胞类型)和心肌细胞(iCM),这与冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的心血管后果一致。在这些细胞类型中未观察到IFN或OAS-RNase L的强烈激活,而PKR激活在iAT2和iCM中很明显。在SARS-CoV-2感染的Calu-3和A549肺源性细胞系中,IFN诱导仍然相对较弱;然而,观察到OAS-RNase L和PKR的激活。这与中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)相反,MERS-CoV有效抑制IFN信号传导以及OAS-RNase L和PKR途径,但与缺乏先天免疫拮抗剂的突变MERS-CoV相似。值得注意的是,OAS-RNase L和PKR在敲除A549细胞中均被激活,这表明SARS-CoV-2尽管产生的IFN极少,但仍可诱导这些宿主抗病毒途径。此外,敲除A549细胞中复制增加和细胞病变效应增加表明OAS-RNase L在限制SARS-CoV-2方面发挥作用。最后,虽然SARS-CoV-2未能拮抗这些宿主防御途径,这与其他冠状病毒形成对比,但IFN信号反应通常较弱。这些宿主-病毒相互作用可能导致SARS-CoV-2独特的发病机制。
2019年末出现的SARS-CoV-2导致了COVID-19大流行,对人类健康和经济造成了毁灭性影响。早期先天免疫反应对于抵御病毒入侵至关重要。虽然先天免疫反应不足与严重的COVID-19疾病有关,但对SARS-CoV-2与宿主抗病毒途径相互作用的了解很少。我们已经描述了在相关呼吸道来源的细胞和心肌细胞中对SARS-CoV-2感染的先天免疫反应,发现SARS-CoV-2激活了两条抗病毒途径,即寡腺苷酸合成酶-核糖核酸酶L(OAS-RNase L)和蛋白激酶R(PKR),同时诱导产生的干扰素水平极低。这与抑制所有三条途径的MERS-CoV形成对比。这些途径的激活可能导致SARS-CoV-2独特的发病机制。