• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务概率对优先处理的影响:调节并行反应选择的效率。

Effects of task probability on prioritized processing: Modulating the efficiency of parallel response selection.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan;83(1):356-388. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02143-7. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-020-02143-7
PMID:33000438
Abstract

Four experiments investigated the extent to which a limited pool of resources can be shared between different tasks performed simultaneously when it is efficient to do so. The experiments used a prioritized processing paradigm, in which stimuli for both a primary task and a background task were presented in each trial. If the primary-task stimulus required a response in a trial, participants made only that response. If the primary-task stimulus did not require a response, participants responded to the background task. The main manipulation was the relative probability that a response would be required to the primary versus background task. In some blocks, the majority of trials required responses to the primary task (Experiments 1 and 2: 80%; Experiments 3 and 4: 60%), whereas in other blocks the majority required responses to the background task. Background-task responses were substantially faster in blocks where they were more likely to be required, consistent with the idea that more capacity was allocated to them in these blocks. Backward compatibility effects on primary-task responses and stimulus-onset asynchrony effects on background-task responses provided further evidence of greater capacity allocation to the background task when there was a higher probability of responding to it. The results support the view that two tasks can be processed in parallel, with resources divided between them, when it is efficient to do so.

摘要

四个实验研究了当同时进行的不同任务之间的资源共享是有效时,资源在多大程度上可以共享。这些实验使用了优先级处理范式,其中每个试验都呈现了主要任务和背景任务的刺激。如果主要任务刺激需要在试验中做出响应,参与者只需做出该响应。如果主要任务刺激不需要响应,则参与者响应背景任务。主要的操作是响应主要任务与背景任务的相对概率。在一些块中,大多数试验都需要对主要任务做出响应(实验 1 和 2:80%;实验 3 和 4:60%),而在其他块中,大多数试验需要对背景任务做出响应。在更有可能需要背景任务响应的块中,背景任务响应要快得多,这与在这些块中分配更多容量的观点一致。对主要任务响应的向后兼容性效应和对背景任务响应的刺激起始异步效应进一步证明了当更有可能响应背景任务时,会向其分配更多的容量。结果支持这样一种观点,即当这样做有效时,两个任务可以并行处理,资源在它们之间分配。

相似文献

1
Effects of task probability on prioritized processing: Modulating the efficiency of parallel response selection.任务概率对优先处理的影响:调节并行反应选择的效率。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan;83(1):356-388. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02143-7. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.电生理证据表明,在多任务处理期间不存在平行的运动处理。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Jan;59(1):e13951. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13951. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
3
Transfer of task-probability-induced biases in parallel dual-task processing occurs in similar, but is constraint in distinct task sets.在并行双任务处理中,任务-概率诱导偏差的转移发生在相似的任务集,但受到不同任务集的约束。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 May;50(5):775-795. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001259. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.多任务范式中准备与在线处理的分离限制:资源模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000277. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.反应兼容性以及事件相关电位与运动反应时间之间的关系。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3705-13. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3705.
6
"Just do it when you get a chance": the effects of a background task on primary task performance.“一有机会就去做”:一项背景任务对主要任务表现的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Nov;76(8):2560-74. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0730-3. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.双任务表现中的自动刺激-反应转换
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1368-84. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1368.
8
Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人的向后兼容性效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jul;78(5):1337-50. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1113-8.
9
Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.响应选择瓶颈处的信息连续性:早期并行的任务2响应激活有助于任务2的公开表现。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):934-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0457-6.
10
How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking.如何停止并改变一种反应:目标激活在多任务处理中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1212-28. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1212.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.人类多重任务中的认知结构、灵活性和可塑性——双任务和任务转换研究的综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
2
The role of feedback delay in dual-task performance.反馈延迟在双重任务表现中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0874-6. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
3
Mechanisms of Practice-Related Reductions of Dual-Task Interference with Simple Tasks: Data and Theory.
与简单任务相关的练习对双重任务干扰的减少机制:数据与理论
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):28-41. doi: 10.5709/acp-0204-7. eCollection 2017.
4
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Action dynamics in multitasking: the impact of additional task factors on the execution of the prioritized motor movement.多任务处理中的动作动力学:额外任务因素对优先运动动作执行的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 6;6:934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00934. eCollection 2015.
6
Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.双任务中的并行和串行处理分别涉及纹状体和外侧前额叶皮层中的机制。
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Nov;220(6):3131-42. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0847-0. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.压力提高双任务中的任务处理效率。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance.深度思考会增加任务集屏蔽,降低双重任务表现中的转换灵活性。
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):303-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: what is more effortful?双重任务中的串行或并行处理:哪种更费力?
Psychophysiology. 2009 May;46(3):502-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00806.x.
10
On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.心理不应期范式中串行与并行加工的最优性:刺激起始异步分布的影响
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):273-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003. Epub 2009 Mar 17.