Kumar Navin, Janmohamed Kamila, Jiang Jeannette, Ainooson Jessica, Billings Ameera, Chen Grace Q, Chumo Faith, Cueto Lauren, Niaura Raymond, Zhang Amy
Human Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Human Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106612. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106612. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
The growing prevalence of tobacco use in low "to middle" income countries (LMICs) and the hurdles of conducting tobacco cessation in that context necessitates a focus on the scope of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in LMICs to guide tobacco cessation in this environment. We conducted a scoping review to identify LMIC tobacco cessation RCTs.
Consistent with PRISMA-ScR guidelines and without language restrictions, we systematically searched peer-reviewed databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, articles published since inception, latest searches in March 2020) and gray literature (clinical trials registries, searches between September and December 2019). We searched for data on RCT type, outcome significance and intervention description. Inclusion: research conducted in LMICs; tobacco cessation; RCT. Exclusion: research conducted in high income countries; non-RCT; studies involving only those aged <18. Data was extracted from published reports. We generated narrative summaries of each LMIC's tobacco cessation RCT research environment.
Of 8404 articles screened, we identified 92 studies. Tobacco cessation RCTs were recorded in 16 of 138 countries/territories in LMICs. Evidence was weak in quality and severely limited. Most RCTs were psychosocial, with limited behavioral and pharmacological variants.
Tobacco control within LMICs is essential to reduce the tobacco mortality burden. Researchers should be cognizant that tobacco cessation in LMICs is still not an environment where best practice has been established. We suggest that developing solutions specific for LMICs is key to effective tobacco control in LMICs.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)烟草使用的流行率不断上升,且在这种背景下开展戒烟存在诸多障碍,因此有必要关注LMICs中随机对照试验(RCT)的范围,以指导该环境下的戒烟工作。我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定LMICs中的戒烟RCT。
按照PRISMA-ScR指南,且无语言限制,我们系统检索了同行评审数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO,自数据库建立以来发表的文章,2020年3月的最新检索)和灰色文献(临床试验注册库,2019年9月至12月的检索)。我们搜索了关于RCT类型、结果意义和干预描述的数据。纳入标准:在LMICs开展的研究;戒烟;RCT。排除标准:在高收入国家开展的研究;非RCT;仅涉及18岁以下人群的研究。数据从已发表的报告中提取。我们对每个LMIC的戒烟RCT研究环境进行了叙述性总结。
在筛选的8404篇文章中,我们确定了92项研究。在LMICs的138个国家/地区中的16个记录了戒烟RCT。证据质量薄弱且极为有限。大多数RCT是心理社会方面的,行为和药物方面的变体有限。
LMICs内的烟草控制对于减轻烟草死亡负担至关重要。研究人员应认识到,LMICs中的戒烟仍未形成最佳实践环境。我们建议,针对LMICs制定具体解决方案是LMICs有效控烟的关键。