R.E. Lewiss is professor of emergency medicine and radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
R. Jagsi is Newman Family Professor and deputy chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, and director, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):792-794. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003987.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the upheaval it is causing may be leading to novel manifestations of the well-established mechanisms by which women have been marginalized in professional roles, robbing the field of the increased collective intelligence that exists when diverse perspectives are embraced. Unconscious bias, gendered expectations, and overt hostility minimize the contributions of women in academic medicine to the detriment of all. The current environment of heightened stress and new socially distant forms of communication may be exacerbating these well-recognized obstacles to women contributing to the field. Of note, none of these actions requires ill intent; all they require is the activation of unconscious biases and almost instinctive preferences and behaviors that favor the comfortable and familiar leadership of men in a time of extreme stress. The authors argue that it is time to investigate the frequency of behaviors that limit both the recognition and the very exercise of women's leadership during this pandemic, which is unprecedented but nevertheless may recur in the future. Leaders in health care must pay attention to equity, diversity, and inclusion given increases in undermining and harassing behaviors toward women during this crisis. The longer-term consequences of marginalizing women may hamper efforts to combat the next pandemic, so the time to flatten the rising gender bias curve in academic medicine is now.
COVID-19 大流行及其带来的动荡可能导致长期存在的使女性在职业角色中处于边缘地位的机制出现新的表现形式,从而使该领域失去了多样性观点带来的集体智慧的提升。无意识偏见、性别期望和公然的敌意使女性在学术医学中的贡献最小化,这对所有人都不利。当前压力加剧和新的社交隔离沟通形式的环境可能会加剧这些公认的女性参与该领域的障碍。值得注意的是,这些行为都不需要恶意;它们只需要激活无意识的偏见以及在极端压力下本能地偏好和行为,即有利于男性舒适和熟悉的领导方式。作者认为,现在是时候调查在这场前所未有的大流行期间限制女性领导力的识别和实践的行为的频率了,这种情况未来可能还会再次发生。医疗保健领导者必须关注公平、多样性和包容性,因为在这场危机中针对女性的破坏和骚扰行为有所增加。在学术医学中边缘化女性的长期后果可能会阻碍对抗下一次大流行的努力,因此现在是时候减少学术医学中不断上升的性别偏见了。