• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚城乡纵向蚊虫家庭调查中埃及伊蚊家庭蛹持续存在的风险因素。

Risk factors for Aedes aegypti household pupal persistence in longitudinal entomological household surveys in urban and rural Kenya.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Department of Zoology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Biological Sciences, Chuka University, Chuka, Kenya.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2020 Oct 1;13(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04378-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13071-020-04378-7
PMID:33004074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7528257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aedes aegypti is an efficient vector of several arboviruses of public health importance, including Zika and dengue. Currently vector management is the only available avenue for disease control. Development of efficient vector control strategies requires a thorough understanding of vector ecology. In this study, we identified households that are consistently productive for Ae. aegypti pupae and determined the ecological and socio-demographic factors associated with the persistence and abundance of pupae in households in rural and urban Kenya.

METHODS

We collected socio-demographic, environmental and entomological data monthly from July 2014 to June 2018 from 80 households across four sites in Kenya. Pupae count data were collected via entomological surveillance of households and paired with socio-demographic and environmental data. We calculated pupal persistence within a household as the number of months of pupal presence within a year. We used spatially explicit generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to identify the risk factors for pupal abundance, and a logistic regression to identify the risk factors for pupal persistence in households.

RESULTS

The median number of months of pupal presence observed in households was 4 and ranged from 0 to 35 months. We identified pupal persistence in 85 house-years. The strongest risk factors for high pupal abundance were the presence of bushes or tall grass in the peri-domicile area (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.13-2.28), open eaves (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.33-4.95) and high habitat counts (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.21-1.66). The main risk factors for pupal persistence were the presence of bushes or tall grass in the peri-domicile (OR: 4.20, 95% CI: 1.42-12.46) and high number of breeding sites (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.03-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed Ae. aegypti pupal persistence at the household level in urban and rural and in coastal and inland Kenya. High counts of potential breeding containers, vegetation in the peri-domicile area and the presence of eaves were strongly associated with increased risk of pupal persistence and abundance. Targeting households that exhibit pupal persistence alongside the risk factors for pupal abundance in vector control interventions may result in more efficient use of limited resources.

摘要

背景

埃及伊蚊是几种具有公共卫生重要性的虫媒病毒的有效载体,包括寨卡病毒和登革热病毒。目前,病媒控制是疾病控制的唯一可行途径。开发有效的病媒控制策略需要对病媒生态学有透彻的了解。在这项研究中,我们确定了始终能产生埃及伊蚊蛹的家庭,并确定了与肯尼亚农村和城市家庭中蛹的持续存在和丰度相关的生态和社会人口因素。

方法

我们从 2014 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月,每月从肯尼亚四个地点的 80 户家庭收集社会人口、环境和昆虫学数据。通过家庭的昆虫学监测收集蛹计数数据,并与社会人口和环境数据配对。我们将家庭内的蛹持续存在定义为一年内蛹存在的月数。我们使用空间显式广义加性混合模型(GAMM)来确定蛹丰度的危险因素,并使用逻辑回归来确定家庭中蛹持续存在的危险因素。

结果

家庭中观察到的蛹存在月数的中位数为 4 个月,范围为 0 至 35 个月。我们在 85 个房屋年内发现了蛹的持续存在。高蛹丰度的最强危险因素是围生境区域有灌木或高草(OR:1.60,95%CI:1.13-2.28)、敞口屋檐(OR:2.57,95%CI:1.33-4.95)和高栖息地计数(OR:1.42,95%CI:1.21-1.66)。蛹持续存在的主要危险因素是围生境区域有灌木或高草(OR:4.20,95%CI:1.42-12.46)和高繁殖地点数量(OR:2.17,95%CI:1.03-4.58)。

结论

我们在肯尼亚城乡、沿海和内陆观察到埃及伊蚊蛹在家庭层面的持续存在。潜在繁殖容器数量高、围生境区域植被和屋檐的存在与增加蛹持续存在和丰度的风险密切相关。在病媒控制干预措施中,针对表现出蛹持续存在的家庭,并针对蛹丰度的危险因素进行靶向干预,可能会更有效地利用有限的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/6789717c5aa9/13071_2020_4378_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/2ac74d6206e8/13071_2020_4378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/412ae7f94a4a/13071_2020_4378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/5b210fa8fab4/13071_2020_4378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/1a8c048f2be4/13071_2020_4378_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/bc5829d90e91/13071_2020_4378_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/ba054ebdf0b6/13071_2020_4378_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/6789717c5aa9/13071_2020_4378_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/2ac74d6206e8/13071_2020_4378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/412ae7f94a4a/13071_2020_4378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/5b210fa8fab4/13071_2020_4378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/1a8c048f2be4/13071_2020_4378_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/bc5829d90e91/13071_2020_4378_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/ba054ebdf0b6/13071_2020_4378_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83d9/7528257/6789717c5aa9/13071_2020_4378_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for Aedes aegypti household pupal persistence in longitudinal entomological household surveys in urban and rural Kenya.肯尼亚城乡纵向蚊虫家庭调查中埃及伊蚊家庭蛹持续存在的风险因素。
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Oct 1;13(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04378-7.
2
Household-level risk factors for Aedes aegypti pupal density in Guayaquil, Ecuador.厄瓜多尔瓜亚基尔家庭层面埃及伊蚊蛹密度的风险因素。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Sep 7;14(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04913-0.
3
Characterization and productivity profiles of Aedes aegypti (L.) breeding habitats across rural and urban landscapes in western and coastal Kenya.肯尼亚西部和沿海地区城乡景观中埃及伊蚊(L.)繁殖栖息地的特征及生产力概况
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jul 12;10(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2271-9.
4
Aedes aegypti breeding ecology in Guerrero: cross-sectional study of mosquito breeding sites from the baseline for the Camino Verde trial in Mexico.墨西哥格雷罗州埃及伊蚊的繁殖生态:墨西哥绿道试验基线期蚊虫繁殖地的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4293-9.
5
Effects of socio-demographic characteristics and household water management on Aedes aegypti production in suburban and rural villages in Laos and Thailand.社会人口特征和家庭用水管理对老挝和泰国城乡郊区埃及伊蚊繁殖的影响。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Apr 4;10(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2107-7.
6
Epidemic risk of arboviral diseases: Determining the habitats, spatial-temporal distribution, and abundance of immature Aedes aegypti in the Urban and Rural areas of Zanzibar, Tanzania.虫媒病毒病的流行风险:在坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔的城乡地区确定埃及伊蚊的栖息地、时空分布和丰度。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Dec 7;14(12):e0008949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008949. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
A cross-sectional survey of Aedes aegypti immature abundance in urban and rural household containers in central Colombia.哥伦比亚中部城乡家庭容器中埃及伊蚊幼虫丰度的横断面调查。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jul 27;10(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2295-1.
8
Density of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in a low-income Brazilian urban community where dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses co-circulate.在一个低收入的巴西城市社区中,登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热病毒共同传播,埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的密度。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 May 6;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05766-5.
9
Ecological, Social, and Other Environmental Determinants of Dengue Vector Abundance in Urban and Rural Areas of Northeastern Thailand.泰国东北部城乡登革热媒介丰度的生态、社会和其他环境决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;18(11):5971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115971.
10
"Where we put little fish in the water there are no mosquitoes:" a cross-sectional study on biological control of the Aedes aegypti vector in 90 coastal-region communities of Guerrero, Mexico.“在我们投放小鱼的水域没有蚊子”:墨西哥格雷罗州90个沿海地区社区埃及伊蚊病媒生物防治的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4302-z.

引用本文的文献

1
School and home-based educational intervention in urban Kenya: Sustained improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and practices for Aedes aegypti control.肯尼亚城市地区基于学校和家庭的教育干预措施:埃及伊蚊控制知识、态度和实践的持续改善。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;5(6):e0004567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004567. eCollection 2025.
2
Temporal Variation and Human Host Predominance in from Coastal and Western Kenya: Insights from Pooled Blood Meal Metagenomics.肯尼亚沿海和西部地区按蚊的时间变化及人类宿主优势:来自混合血餐宏基因组学的见解
Pathogens. 2025 May 21;14(5):505. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14050505.
3
Comparison of unmanned aerial vehicle imaging to ground truth walkthroughs for identifying and classifying trash sites serving as potential Aedes aegypti breeding grounds.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses in Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in a medium-sized city, Amazon, Brazil.巴西亚马逊地区一个中等城市埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)中登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅病毒的流行情况
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2020 Feb 7;62:e10. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202062010. eCollection 2020.
2
Malaria smear positivity among Kenyan children peaks at intermediate temperatures as predicted by ecological models.肯尼亚儿童的疟疾涂片阳性率在生态模型预测的中等温度下达到峰值。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jun 6;12(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3547-z.
3
Role of container type, behavioural, and ecological factors in Aedes pupal production in Dhaka, Bangladesh: An application of zero-inflated negative binomial model.
无人机成像与实地巡查对比,以识别和分类作为埃及伊蚊潜在滋生地的垃圾场。
Parasit Vectors. 2025 Mar 6;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06706-1.
4
Seroprevalence, incidence estimates, and environmental risk factors for dengue, chikungunya, and Zika infection amongst children living in informal urban settlements in Indonesia and Fiji.印度尼西亚和斐济城市非正式住区儿童登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒感染的血清流行率、发病率估计及环境风险因素
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10315-1.
5
Seroprevalence, incidence estimates, and environmental risk factors for dengue, chikungunya, and Zika infection amongst children living in informal urban settlements in Indonesia and Fiji.印度尼西亚和斐济城市非正规住区儿童登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒感染的血清流行率、发病率估计及环境风险因素
Res Sq. 2024 Nov 13:rs.3.rs-5141509. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5141509/v1.
6
Quantitative modelling for dengue and Aedes mosquitoes in Africa: A systematic review of current approaches and future directions for Early Warning System development.非洲登革热和伊蚊的定量建模:早期预警系统开发的当前方法和未来方向的系统综述
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Nov 26;18(11):e0012679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012679. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Understanding the factors contributing to dengue virus and chikungunya virus seropositivity and seroconversion among children in Kenya.了解肯尼亚儿童登革热病毒和基孔肯雅热病毒血清阳性和血清转换的相关因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Nov 20;18(11):e0012616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012616. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Molecular epidemiology and evolutionary characteristics of dengue virus 2 in East Africa.东非地区登革热病毒 2 型的分子流行病学和进化特征。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 7;15(1):7832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51018-0.
9
Oviposition Preferences of Aedes aegypti in Msambweni, Kwale County, Kenya.肯尼亚夸莱郡姆桑布韦的埃及伊蚊产卵偏好。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2023 Jun 1;39(2):85-95. doi: 10.2987/22-7103.
10
Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers.哥伦比亚库库塔大都市区登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热传播风险:横断面分析,新型水容器病媒控制工具群组随机对照试验的基线
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
容器类型、行为及生态因素在孟加拉国达卡伊蚊蛹产量中的作用:零膨胀负二项式模型的应用
Acta Trop. 2019 May;193:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
How house design affects malaria mosquito density, temperature, and relative humidity: an experimental study in rural Gambia.房屋设计如何影响疟蚊密度、温度和相对湿度:冈比亚农村的一项实验研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Nov;2(11):e498-e508. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30234-1.
5
Impact of partially and fully closed eaves on house entry rates by mosquitoes.部分和完全封闭屋檐对蚊子进入房屋率的影响。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2977-3.
6
Risk factors for the presence of dengue vector mosquitoes, and determinants of their prevalence and larval site selection in Dhaka, Bangladesh.孟加拉国达卡登革热媒介蚊虫存在的风险因素,及其流行和幼虫栖息地选择的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199457. eCollection 2018.
7
Distribution and larval breeding habitats of mosquito species in residential areas of northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部居民区蚊虫种类的分布和幼虫孳生环境。
Epidemiol Health. 2018 Apr 23;40:e2018015. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018015. eCollection 2018.
8
House screening with insecticide-treated netting provides sustained reductions in domestic populations of Aedes aegypti in Merida, Mexico.在墨西哥梅里达,使用经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐进行家庭筛查可持续减少埃及伊蚊的家庭种群。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Mar 15;12(3):e0006283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006283. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
Dengue and yellow fever virus vectors: seasonal abundance, diversity and resting preferences in three Kenyan cities.登革热和黄热病病毒媒介:肯尼亚三个城市的季节性丰度、多样性和休息偏好。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Dec 29;10(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2598-2.
10
Characteristics of Aedes aegypti adult mosquitoes in rural and urban areas of western and coastal Kenya.肯尼亚西部和沿海地区农村及城市成年埃及伊蚊的特征
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):e0189971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189971. eCollection 2017.