Ding Ding, Xiao Zhenxu, Liang Xiaoniu, Wu Wanqing, Zhao Qianhua, Cao Yang
Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Aug 26;12:266. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00266. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to evaluate the value of odors in the olfactory identification (OI) test and other known risk factors for predicting incident dementia in the prospective Shanghai Aging Study.
At baseline, OI was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Screening Test 12, which contains 12 different odors. Cognition assessment and consensus diagnosis were conducted at both baseline and follow-up to identify incident dementia. Four different multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used for predicting incident dementia. In the no-odor model, only demographics, lifestyle, and medical history variables were included. In the single-odor model, we further added one single odor to the first model. In the full model, all 12 odors were included. In the stepwise model, the variables were selected using a bidirectional stepwise selection method. The predictive abilities of these models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The permutation importance method was used to evaluate the relative importance of different odors and other known risk factors.
Seventy-five (8%) incident dementia cases were diagnosed during 4.9 years of follow-up among 947 participants. The full and the stepwise MLR model (AUC = 0.916 and 0.914, respectively) have better predictive abilities compared with those of the no- or single-odor models. The five most important variables are Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, age, peppermint detection, coronary artery disease, and height in the full model, and MMSE, age, peppermint detection, stroke, and education in the stepwise model. The combination of only the top five variables in the stepwise model (AUC = 0.901 and sensitivity = 0.880) has as a good a predictive ability as other models.
The ability to smell peppermint might be one of the useful indicators for predicting dementia. Combining peppermint detection with MMSE, age, education, and history of stroke may have sensitive and robust predictive value for dementia in older adults.
本研究旨在评估嗅觉识别(OI)测试中的气味以及其他已知风险因素在上海老龄化前瞻性研究中预测新发痴呆症的价值。
在基线时,使用包含12种不同气味的嗅觉棒筛查测试12评估OI。在基线和随访时均进行认知评估和一致性诊断以识别新发痴呆症。使用四种不同的多变量逻辑回归(MLR)模型预测新发痴呆症。在无气味模型中,仅纳入人口统计学、生活方式和病史变量。在单一气味模型中,我们在第一个模型中进一步添加一种单一气味。在完整模型中,纳入所有12种气味。在逐步模型中,使用双向逐步选择方法选择变量。通过受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积评估这些模型的预测能力。使用排列重要性方法评估不同气味和其他已知风险因素的相对重要性。
在947名参与者的4.9年随访期间,诊断出75例(8%)新发痴呆症病例。完整和逐步MLR模型(AUC分别为0.916和0.914)与无气味或单一气味模型相比具有更好的预测能力。完整模型中五个最重要的变量是简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分、年龄、薄荷醇检测、冠状动脉疾病和身高,逐步模型中是MMSE、年龄、薄荷醇检测、中风和教育程度。逐步模型中仅前五个变量的组合(AUC = 0.901,灵敏度 = 0.880)具有与其他模型一样好的预测能力。
闻薄荷醇的能力可能是预测痴呆症的有用指标之一。将薄荷醇检测与MMSE、年龄、教育程度和中风病史相结合可能对老年人痴呆症具有敏感且可靠的预测价值。