Gerber Manuela, Dürr Salome, Bodmer Michèle
Vetsuisse-Faculty, Clinic for Ruminants, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Vetsuisse-Faculty, Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 26;7:565. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00565. eCollection 2020.
The reduction of antimicrobials on dairy farms is a topical issue and confronts both veterinarians and farmers with major challenges. The aim of this study was to investigate dairy farmers' motivation to reduce antimicrobial use on their farms. Factors influencing dairy farmers' decision-making regarding dairy cow health were identified and the role of the veterinarian in these processes was characterized. A customized structured questionnaire was sent to all participants ( = 59) of an ongoing antimicrobial reduction project among dairy farmers in the Canton of Fribourg, Switzerland, by mail. Fifty-eight completed questionnaires were returned and evaluated (response rate 98.3%). The majority of respondents were men (56/58, 96.6%) and farm managers (55/57, 96.5%) managing their farms as their main occupation (56/57, 98.2%). Using a 5-point-Likert-scale (1 = not a reason, 5 = very important reason), respondents ranked "My veterinarian is putting pressure on us to use less antimicrobials" (median=2.5, interquartile range = 1-3) and "Other farmers also reduce antimicrobial use" (2.0, 1-3) as the least important factors affecting their motivation to reduce the use of antimicrobials in dairy cows ( < 0.001). Respondents ranked their veterinarian's opinion (4.0, 4-5) and their own feelings and knowledge (4.0, 3-4) as the two factors having significantly more importance on their decisions regarding dairy cow management ( < 0.001). The farmers indicated they were satisfied with the quality of the consultancy given by their veterinarians (4.0, 4-5) and with the quality of communication with veterinarians (4.0, 3-4). They indicated that they understood recommendations made by the veterinarian (4.0, 3.75-4) and also felt understood by the veterinarian (4.0, 3-4). However, only 25.9% (14/54) indicated they were willing to pay for good quality, farm-adapted consulting by their veterinarian. Based on these findings, veterinarians play an important role in influencing Swiss dairy farmers in decision-making concerning animal health and treatment. However, veterinarians were not viewed by farmers as important motivators for reducing antimicrobial use. Swiss veterinarians are encouraged to be aware of their influence on farmers' decisions and to use that influence to more clearly promote antimicrobial reduction on dairy farms.
减少奶牛场抗菌药物的使用是一个热门话题,给兽医和农民都带来了重大挑战。本研究的目的是调查奶农减少其农场抗菌药物使用的动机。确定了影响奶农关于奶牛健康决策的因素,并描述了兽医在这些过程中的作用。通过邮件向瑞士弗里堡州一个正在进行的奶农抗菌药物减量项目的所有参与者((n = 59))发送了一份定制的结构化问卷。共收回并评估了58份完整问卷(回复率98.3%)。大多数受访者为男性(56/58,96.6%),且为农场管理者(55/57,96.5%),他们将管理农场作为主要职业(56/57,98.2%)。使用5点李克特量表(1 = 不是理由,5 = 非常重要的理由),受访者将“我的兽医向我们施压以减少抗菌药物的使用”(中位数 = 2.5,四分位间距 = 1 - 3)和“其他农民也减少抗菌药物的使用”(2.0,1 - 3)列为影响他们减少奶牛抗菌药物使用动机的最不重要因素((P < 0.001))。受访者将兽医的意见(4.0,4 - 5)和他们自己的感受及知识(4.0,3 - 4)列为在他们关于奶牛管理决策中具有显著更重要意义的两个因素((P < 0.001))。农民表示他们对兽医提供的咨询质量(4.0,4 - 5)以及与兽医的沟通质量(4.0,3 - 4)感到满意。他们表示理解兽医给出的建议(4.0,3.75 - 4),并且也感觉被兽医理解(4.0,3 - 4)。然而,只有25.9%(14/54)表示他们愿意为兽医提供的高质量、适合农场的咨询付费。基于这些发现,兽医在影响瑞士奶农关于动物健康和治疗的决策方面发挥着重要作用。然而,农民并不认为兽医是减少抗菌药物使用的重要推动因素。鼓励瑞士兽医意识到他们对农民决策的影响,并利用这种影响更明确地促进奶牛场减少抗菌药物的使用。