• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于框架合成的“快速最佳拟合”模型:在定性证据的快速综述中利用研究目标构建分析。

A "Rapid Best-Fit" model for framework synthesis: Using research objectives to structure analysis within a rapid review of qualitative evidence.

作者信息

Shaw Liz, Nunns Michael, Briscoe Simon, Anderson Rob, Thompson Coon Jo

机构信息

College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, University of Exeter, Devon, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

出版信息

Res Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):368-383. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1462. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1462
PMID:33006277
Abstract

The short time frame associated with rapid reviews can be challenging for researchers conducting qualitative evidence synthesis. In these circumstances a Best-Fit Framework Synthesis, drawing upon existing theory and/or research, may be conducted to rapidly make sense of qualitative evidence. This article discusses a "Rapid Best-Fit" approach to conducting Framework Synthesis within an 6-week rapid systematic review of qualitative evidence. In the absence of a suitable theoretical model to inform the synthesis, we drew upon our research objectives to structure a framework, and to identify the studies which contained the most relevant data. Themes from these studies were used to revise the initial framework before inductive thematic synthesis finalized theme content. This "Rapid Best-Fit" approach yielded results aligned with the needs of the commissioners of the review and is a useful addition to qualitative synthesis methods, allowing for the incorporation of diverse views and experiences into fast-paced decision making scenarios.

摘要

对于进行定性证据综合的研究人员而言,与快速综述相关的短时间框架可能具有挑战性。在这种情况下,可以采用基于现有理论和/或研究的最佳拟合框架综合法,以便迅速理解定性证据。本文讨论了一种在对定性证据进行为期6周的快速系统综述中进行框架综合的“快速最佳拟合”方法。由于缺乏合适的理论模型来指导综合,我们利用研究目标构建了一个框架,并确定了包含最相关数据的研究。这些研究中的主题被用于修订初始框架,然后通过归纳主题综合确定主题内容。这种“快速最佳拟合”方法产生的结果符合综述委托方的需求,是定性综合方法的有益补充,能够将不同观点和经验纳入快节奏的决策场景。

相似文献

1
A "Rapid Best-Fit" model for framework synthesis: Using research objectives to structure analysis within a rapid review of qualitative evidence.用于框架合成的“快速最佳拟合”模型:在定性证据的快速综述中利用研究目标构建分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):368-383. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1462. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
"Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method.“最佳拟合”框架综合法:方法的完善。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-37.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies.基于框架的综合方法在定性研究综述中的应用。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 14;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39.
5
What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.在英国,对于怀孕过程顺利的健康女性而言,是什么影响了她们对分娩地点的偏好、选择和决策?一项采用“最佳匹配”框架方法的定性证据综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
Patients' perceptions and experiences of cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention programmes: A systematic review and framework synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.患者对心血管疾病和糖尿病预防项目的认知与体验:使用理论领域框架的系统评价与框架综合分析
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;156:192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance.一项范围综述发现越来越多的快速定性证据综合的例子,但没有方法学指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:160-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.032. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指导。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Jun 1;19(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000282.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the impact of housing insecurity on the health and wellbeing of children and young people in the United Kingdom: a qualitative systematic review.探索住房无保障对英国儿童和青少年健康和福利的影响:一项定性系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):2453. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19735-9.
2
Triggers and factors associated with moral distress and moral injury in health and social care workers: A systematic review of qualitative studies.医疗和社会保健工作者产生道德困境和道德伤害的触发因素和相关因素:定性研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0303013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303013. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhancing the utilization of healthy living interventions among cancer survivors in historically underserved populations and communities.
提高健康生活干预措施在历史上服务不足的人群和社区中的癌症幸存者中的利用率。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Aug;34(8):635-645. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01701-2. Epub 2023 May 10.