• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于框架的综合方法在定性研究综述中的应用。

Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies.

机构信息

Social Science Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2011 Apr 14;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39.

DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-9-39
PMID:21492447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3095548/
Abstract

Framework analysis is a technique used for data analysis in primary qualitative research. Recent years have seen its being adapted to conduct syntheses of qualitative studies. Framework-based synthesis shows considerable promise in addressing applied policy questions. An innovation in the approach, known as 'best fit' framework synthesis, has been published in BMC Medical Research Methodology this month. It involves reviewers in choosing a conceptual model likely to be suitable for the question of the review, and using it as the basis of their initial coding framework. This framework is then modified in response to the evidence reported in the studies in the reviews, so that the final product is a revised framework that may include both modified factors and new factors that were not anticipated in the original model. 'Best fit' framework-based synthesis may be especially suitable in addressing urgent policy questions where the need for a more fully developed synthesis is balanced by the need for a quick answer. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/29.

摘要

框架分析是一种用于主要定性研究数据分析的技术。近年来,它已被用于对定性研究进行综合分析。基于框架的综合分析在解决应用政策问题方面显示出很大的前景。该方法的一项创新,即“最佳拟合”框架综合分析,本月已在《BMC 医学研究方法学》上发表。它要求审稿人选择一个可能适合审查问题的概念模型,并将其作为他们初始编码框架的基础。然后,根据综述中报告的证据,对该框架进行修改,以便最终得到一个经过修订的框架,其中可能包括在原始模型中没有预料到的修改后的因素和新因素。“最佳拟合”基于框架的综合分析可能特别适用于解决紧急政策问题,在这些问题中,对更全面的综合分析的需求与对快速答案的需求相平衡。请参阅相关文章:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/29。

相似文献

1
Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies.基于框架的综合方法在定性研究综述中的应用。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 14;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A "Rapid Best-Fit" model for framework synthesis: Using research objectives to structure analysis within a rapid review of qualitative evidence.用于框架合成的“快速最佳拟合”模型:在定性证据的快速综述中利用研究目标构建分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):368-383. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1462. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Patients' perceptions and experiences of cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention programmes: A systematic review and framework synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.患者对心血管疾病和糖尿病预防项目的认知与体验:使用理论领域框架的系统评价与框架综合分析
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;156:192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Socioeconomic Impact Research in European Cancer Patients: A 'Best-Fit' Framework Synthesis.制定欧洲癌症患者社会经济影响研究的概念框架:最佳拟合框架综合。
Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):515-536. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00632-z. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Impact of economic recessions on healthcare workers and their crises' responses: study protocol for a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence for the development of an evidence-based conceptual framework.经济衰退对医护人员的影响及其危机应对措施:一项系统评价的研究方案,旨在对定性和定量证据进行综述,以建立基于证据的概念框架。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e032972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032972.
7
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指导。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Jun 1;19(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000282.
8
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
9
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence.收敛性和序列性综合设计:对定性和定量证据进行系统评价的实施与报告的影响
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2.
10
"Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method.“最佳拟合”框架综合法:方法的完善。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-37.

引用本文的文献

1
Resolving Challenges in HIV Cure-Related Research: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Consensus-Building Process.解决艾滋病治愈相关研究中的挑战:改进的德尔菲共识构建过程方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 6;14:e67123. doi: 10.2196/67123.
2
Exploring the Perceptions of Voice-Assisted Technology as a Tool for Speech and Voice Difficulties: Focus Group Study Among People With Parkinson Disease and Their Carers.探索语音辅助技术作为解决言语和声音障碍工具的认知:帕金森病患者及其照料者的焦点小组研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul 16;12:e75316. doi: 10.2196/75316.
3
A conceptual model of factors potentially influencing prescribing decisions for chronic conditions: an overview of systematic reviews.慢性病处方决策潜在影响因素的概念模型:系统评价综述
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04194-9.
4
Social determinants associated with mental health problems in youth with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review.与智力残疾青年心理健康问题相关的社会决定因素:一项系统的文献综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02794-7.
5
Patient experience of treatment burden in chronic heart failure self-care interventions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.慢性心力衰竭自我护理干预中患者的治疗负担体验:一项定性系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e099704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099704.
6
A qualitative exploration of counterfeit, substandard, spurious, and adulterated drugs in Pakistan: A perspective of drug law experts.巴基斯坦假药、劣药、伪药和掺假药品的定性探索:药品法律专家的视角
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0322188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322188. eCollection 2025.
7
Analysis for health system resilience against the economic crisis: a best-fit framework synthesis.卫生系统应对经济危机的恢复力分析:最佳适配框架综合分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 14;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01285-0.
8
Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.设计院后干预措施以支持危重症康复时需考虑的因素:系统评价与定性证据综合分析
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):80-95. doi: 10.1177/17511437241308674. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Barriers and facilitators to weight-loss in patients with overweight/obesity and cardiac disease: a realist qualitative synthesis.超重/肥胖合并心脏疾病患者减肥的障碍和促进因素:一项现实主义定性综合研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2419574. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2419574. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
10
Workplace-based learning in district health leadership and management strengthening: a framework synthesis.基于工作场所的地区卫生领导与管理强化学习:框架综合分析
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Jan 11;40(1):105-119. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae095.

本文引用的文献

1
A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.“最佳拟合”框架综合的实例研究:关于服用某些潜在化学预防剂的观点的系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 16;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-29.
2
What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.癌症风险基因检测后,哪些因素促进或阻碍了家庭沟通?一项关于原发性定性研究的系统评价和元综合分析。
J Genet Couns. 2010 Aug;19(4):330-42. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
3
A question of balance: a qualitative study of mothers' interpretations of dietary recommendations.平衡的问题:母亲对饮食建议解释的定性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;8(1):51-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1072.
4
Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.定性研究的综合方法:批判性评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Aug 11;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
5
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.一个用于分析公众参与卫生服务研究的多维概念框架。
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x.
6
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.综合定性和定量证据:对可能方法的综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jan;10(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/135581960501000110.
7
The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option.定性研究新获得的可信度?技术本质主义与吸纳的故事。
Qual Health Res. 2003 Sep;13(7):1019-27. doi: 10.1177/1049732303253331.