• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用广义估计方程(GEE)进行多重插补处理非单调缺失的纵向二分类结局。

Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Ariadne Labs, 1620 Tremont St. 3rd Floor, BC3 002D, Boston, MA, 02120-1613, USA.

McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2020 Dec;85(4):890-904. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09729-y. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-020-09729-y
PMID:33006740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7855014/
Abstract

This paper considers multiple imputation (MI) approaches for handling non-monotone missing longitudinal binary responses when estimating parameters of a marginal model using generalized estimating equations (GEE). GEE has been shown to yield consistent estimates of the regression parameters for a marginal model when data are missing completely at random (MCAR). However, when data are missing at random (MAR), the GEE estimates may not be consistent; the MI approaches proposed in this paper minimize bias under MAR. The first MI approach proposed is based on a multivariate normal distribution, but with the addition of pairwise products among the binary outcomes to the multivariate normal vector. Even though the multivariate normal does not impute 0 or 1 values for the missing binary responses, as discussed by Horton et al. (Am Stat 57:229-232, 2003), we suggest not rounding when filling in the missing binary data because it could increase bias. The second MI approach considered is the fully conditional specification (FCS) approach. In this approach, we specify a logistic regression model for each outcome given the outcomes at other time points and the covariates. Typically, one would only include main effects of the outcome at the other times as predictors in the FCS approach, but we explore if bias can be reduced by also including pairwise interactions of the outcomes at other time point in the FCS. In a study of asymptotic bias with non-monotone missing data, the proposed MI approaches are also compared to GEE without imputation. Finally, the proposed methods are illustrated using data from a longitudinal clinical trial comparing four psychosocial treatments from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study, where patients' cocaine use is collected monthly for 6 months during treatment.

摘要

本文考虑了在使用广义估计方程 (GEE) 估计边缘模型参数时,处理非单调缺失纵向二分类响应的多重插补 (MI) 方法。当数据完全随机缺失 (MCAR) 时,GEE 已被证明可以对边缘模型的回归参数给出一致的估计。然而,当数据是随机缺失 (MAR) 时,GEE 估计可能不一致;本文提出的 MI 方法旨在在 MAR 下最小化偏差。提出的第一种 MI 方法基于多元正态分布,但在多元正态向量中添加了二分类结果之间的成对乘积。尽管 Horton 等人讨论过(Am Stat 57:229-232, 2003)多元正态分布不会对缺失的二分类响应赋值 0 或 1,但我们建议在填充缺失的二分类数据时不要舍入,因为这可能会增加偏差。第二种 MI 方法是完全条件规范 (FCS) 方法。在这种方法中,我们根据其他时间点的结果和协变量为每个结果指定一个逻辑回归模型。通常,在 FCS 方法中,仅将其他时间点的结果的主要效应作为预测因子包含在内,但我们探讨了通过在 FCS 中还包含其他时间点的结果的成对交互作用是否可以减少偏差。在一项对非单调缺失数据的渐近偏差的研究中,还将提出的 MI 方法与没有插补的 GEE 进行了比较。最后,使用来自国家药物滥用研究所合作可卡因治疗研究的纵向临床试验的数据说明了提出的方法,其中患者的可卡因使用情况在治疗期间每月收集一次,共 6 个月。

相似文献

1
Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes.使用广义估计方程(GEE)进行多重插补处理非单调缺失的纵向二分类结局。
Psychometrika. 2020 Dec;85(4):890-904. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09729-y. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
GEE with Gaussian estimation of the correlations when data are incomplete.当数据不完整时,采用高斯相关估计的广义估计方程。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00528.x.
3
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.存在与时间呈非线性关联的时变协变量时,用于处理纵向数据中缺失值的多种多重填补方法的比较:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0372-y.
4
Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.在整群随机试验中缺失二分类结局的处理策略。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Feb 16;11:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-18.
5
Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.采用多重插补处理估计相对危险度时丢失的结局数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5.
6
Multiple imputation for non-monotone missing not at random data using the no self-censoring model.使用无自我删失模型对非单调缺失非随机数据进行多重插补。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):1973-1993. doi: 10.1177/09622802231188520. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.多种插补方法处理具有时间过渡限制的纵向分类变量中的缺失值:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0653-0.
8
Joint generalized estimating equations for multivariate longitudinal binary outcomes with missing data: An application to AIDS data.具有缺失数据的多元纵向二元结局的联合广义估计方程:在艾滋病数据中的应用
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):3-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00564.x.
9
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中缺失数据的多种插补方法比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0615-6.
10
Analyzing longitudinal binary data in clinical studies.分析临床研究中的纵向二分类数据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106717. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106717. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot study of twice-weekly group-based written exposure therapy for veterans in residential substance use treatment: effects on PTSD and depressive symptoms.一项针对住院物质使用治疗中的退伍军人的每周两次基于小组的书面暴露疗法的试点研究:对创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的影响。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 10;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00531-0.
2
Ventricular dyssynchrony late after the Fontan operation is associated with decreased survival.Fontan 手术后晚期出现心室失同步与生存率降低有关。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Nov 20;25(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00984-3.
3
Longitudinal associations between psychiatric comorbidity and the severity of gambling disorder: Results from a 36-month follow-up study of clients in Bavarian outpatient addiction care.精神共病与赌博障碍严重程度的纵向关联:巴伐利亚州门诊成瘾治疗中心患者 36 个月随访研究的结果。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Jun 12;12(2):535-546. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00026. Print 2023 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrete Choice Models for Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missing Data: Identification and Inference.非单调不可忽略缺失数据的离散选择模型:识别与推断
Stat Sin. 2018 Oct;28(4):2069-2088. doi: 10.5705/ss.202016.0325.
2
Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.通过完全条件设定对离散和连续数据进行多重填补
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42. doi: 10.1177/0962280206074463.
3
How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory.究竟需要多少次插补?多重插补理论的一些实际阐释。
Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206-13. doi: 10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
4
Multiple imputation and posterior simulation for multivariate missing data in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中多元缺失数据的多重填补与后验模拟
Biometrics. 2000 Dec;56(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.01157.x.
5
GEE with Gaussian estimation of the correlations when data are incomplete.当数据不完整时,采用高斯相关估计的广义估计方程。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00528.x.
6
Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.可卡因依赖的心理社会治疗:美国国立药物滥用研究所合作可卡因治疗研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;56(6):493-502. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.6.493.
7
Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES.多重填补在医学研究中的应用:从艾滋病到美国国家健康与营养检查调查
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Mar;8(1):17-36. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800103.
8
Multiple imputation: a primer.多重填补:入门指南。
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Mar;8(1):3-15. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800102.
9
Performance of generalized estimating equations in practical situations.广义估计方程在实际情况中的性能。
Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):270-8.
10
A note on the bias of estimators with missing data.关于缺失数据估计量偏差的一则注释。
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1163-70.