Redlich Carolin, Dlugos Andrea, Hill Matthew Nicholas, Patel Sachin, Korn Dominika, Enneking Verena, Foerster Katharina, Arolt Volker, Domschke Katharina, Dannlowski Udo, Redlich Ronny
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Departments of Cell Biology and Anatomy and Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Apr;46(5):1020-1027. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00870-x. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
Preclinical evidence indicates that the endocannabinoid system is involved in neural responses to reward. This study aimed to investigate associations between basal serum concentrations of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) with brain functional reward processing. Additionally, a personality measure of reward dependence was obtained. Brain functional data were obtained of 30 right-handed adults by conducting fMRI at 3 Tesla using a reward paradigm. Reward dependence was obtained using the subscale reward dependence of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ). Basal concentrations of AEA and 2-AG were determined in serum. Analyzing the fMRI data, for AEA and 2-AG ANCOVAs were calculated using a full factorial model, with condition (reward > control, loss > control) and concentrations for AEA and 2-AG as factors. Regression analyses were conducted for AEA and 2-AG on TPQ-RD scores. A whole-brain analysis showed a significant interaction effect of AEA concentration by condition (positive vs. negative) within the putamen (x = 26, y = 16, z = -8, F13.51, TFCE = 771.68, k = 70, P = 0.044) resulting from a positive association of basal AEA concentrations and putamen activity to rewarding stimuli, while this association was absent in the loss condition. AEA concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with TPQ reward dependence scores (r = -0.56, P = 0.001). These results show that circulating AEA may modulate brain activation during reward feedback and that the personality measure reward dependence is correlated with AEA concentrations in healthy human volunteers. Future research is needed to further characterize the nature of the lipids' influence on reward processing, the impact on reward anticipation and outcome, and on vulnerability for psychiatric disorders.
临床前证据表明,内源性大麻素系统参与对奖赏的神经反应。本研究旨在调查内源性大麻素花生四烯乙醇胺(AEA)和2-花生四烯酸甘油酯(2-AG)的基础血清浓度与大脑功能性奖赏处理之间的关联。此外,还获得了奖赏依赖的人格测量数据。通过使用奖赏范式在3特斯拉进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI),获取了30名右利手成年人的大脑功能数据。使用三维人格问卷(TPQ)的奖赏依赖分量表获得奖赏依赖数据。测定血清中AEA和2-AG的基础浓度。分析fMRI数据时,使用全因子模型计算AEA和2-AG的协方差分析,将条件(奖赏>对照,损失>对照)以及AEA和2-AG的浓度作为因子。对AEA和2-AG进行关于TPQ-RD分数的回归分析。全脑分析显示,壳核内AEA浓度与条件(正向与负向)之间存在显著的交互作用(x = 26,y = 16,z = -8,F13.51,TFCE = 771.68,k = 70,P = 0.044),这是由于基础AEA浓度与壳核活动对奖赏刺激呈正相关,而在损失条件下这种关联不存在。AEA浓度与TPQ奖赏依赖分数显著负相关(r = -0.56,P = 0.001)。这些结果表明,循环中的AEA可能在奖赏反馈期间调节大脑激活,并且人格测量的奖赏依赖与健康人类志愿者的AEA浓度相关。未来需要进一步研究以更全面地描述这些脂质对奖赏处理的影响性质、对奖赏预期和结果的影响以及对精神疾病易感性的影响。