• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何防止责任扩散破坏基于价值的医疗保健。

How to Keep Diffusion of Responsibility From Undermining Value-Based Care.

机构信息

Associate medical director for population health and clinical assistant professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Hospitalist at the University of Washington in Seattle.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):E802-807. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.802.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2020.802
PMID:33009778
Abstract

Diffusion of responsibility describes how individuals can underperform in circumstances of shared accountability. While not well studied in health care settings, this phenomenon is an unintended consequence of the health care sector's complexity and fragmentation. This article considers 3 ways in which monetary and nonmonetary incentives can mitigate negative consequences of diffusion of responsibility. First, incentives should be finite and focused. Second, health care organizations can incentivize both individual and team performance. Third, organizations can use peer comparison feedback to amplify effective incentivizing strategies.

摘要

责任扩散描述了个人在共同承担责任的情况下如何表现不佳。虽然在医疗保健环境中尚未得到充分研究,但这种现象是医疗保健部门复杂性和碎片化的意外后果。本文考虑了三种通过金钱和非金钱激励来减轻责任扩散负面影响的方法。首先,激励措施应该是有限和有针对性的。其次,医疗机构可以激励个人和团队的绩效。第三,组织可以使用同伴比较反馈来放大有效的激励策略。

相似文献

1
How to Keep Diffusion of Responsibility From Undermining Value-Based Care.如何防止责任扩散破坏基于价值的医疗保健。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):E802-807. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.802.
2
Escape from the diffusion of responsibility: A review and guide for nurses.逃避责任扩散:护士的综述与指南。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):264-270. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12677. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Responsibility amid the social determinants of health.健康社会决定因素中的责任。
Bioethics. 2021 Jan;35(1):6-14. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12782. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
Personal Responsibility and Lifestyle Diseases.个人责任与生活方式疾病。
J Med Philos. 2016 Oct;41(5):480-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw015. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
Monetary and nonmonetary accountability following adverse medical events: options for Canadian patients.医疗不良事件后的货币与非货币问责制:加拿大患者的选择
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):903. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061072.
6
Reform strategies for the English NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系的改革策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun;23(3):37-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.37.
7
Creating incentives for accountability in patient care.建立患者护理问责制的激励机制。
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Jun 1;15(6):522-8. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.6.pfor1-1306.
8
Monetary versus nonmonetary incentives for TB skin test reading among drug users.吸毒者中结核菌素皮肤试验判读的货币激励与非货币激励
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00093-2.
9
Development of a national conceptual framework and measuring tool for Organisational Social Responsibility and Accountability for Health (OSRAH).制定国家概念框架和衡量工具,以实现组织的社会责任和卫生问责制(OSRAH)。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):17-25. doi: 10.1177/1757975918789346. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.医疗护理不良事件后患者寻求的问责制:新西兰的经验
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):889-94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060429.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study on the factors influencing oral health care for young children in Belgium.比利时幼儿口腔保健影响因素的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22153-0.
2
Encouraging the prescribing of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA medications to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial.鼓励处方使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)药物以降低2型糖尿病患者的心血管和肾脏风险:一项随机对照试验的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2025 Jul;285:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.02.007. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in the Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Electronic Health Records.
显著高血压管理中临床医生最佳遵循指南的障碍:电子健康记录的定性内容分析
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 13:2024.01.12.24301223. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.12.24301223.
4
Exploration of pain assessment and management processes in oncology outpatient services with healthcare professionals: a qualitative study.探讨肿瘤门诊服务中医疗保健专业人员的疼痛评估和管理流程:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078619.
5
An Integrated Care Strategy for Pre-schoolers with Suspected Developmental Disorders: The Optimus Co-design Project that has Made it to Regular Care.针对疑似发育障碍学龄前儿童的综合护理策略:已纳入常规护理的擎天柱协同设计项目
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 15;21(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5494.