• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Building a Global Evidence Base to Guide Policy and Implementation for Group Antenatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Key Principles and Research Framework Recommendations from the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative.构建全球循证证据基础,以指导中低收入国家群体产前护理的政策制定和实施:全球群体产前护理协作组织的关键原则和研究框架建议。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Sep;65(5):694-699. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13143. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
2
Group antenatal care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic evidence synthesis.中低收入国家的群体产前保健模式:系统证据综合。
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 5;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0476-9.
3
Better Measurement for Performance Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Experience of Conceptual Framework Development and Indicator Selection.低收入和中等收入国家改善绩效的更好衡量方法:初级卫生保健绩效倡议(PHCPI)概念框架制定和指标选择的经验
Milbank Q. 2017 Dec;95(4):836-883. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12301.
4
Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.产前护理对安全分娩有影响吗?印度北方邦城市地区的一项研究。
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Mar;14(1):38-48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.
5
From research to practice: the example of antenatal care in Thailand.从研究到实践:以泰国的产前护理为例。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):746-9.
6
Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal.测量一致性、可行性和成本:尼泊尔农村地区群组产前护理的群组对照试验的实施评估。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4.
7
Levels and variations in the quality of facility-based antenatal care in Kenya: evidence from the 2010 service provision assessment.肯尼亚基于设施的产前护理质量水平及变化:来自2010年服务提供评估的证据
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Jul;31(6):777-84. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv132. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
8
Evaluating capacity-building for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, service planners and researchers.评估中低收入国家精神卫生系统强化的能力建设,以满足服务使用者和照顾者、服务规划者和研究人员的需求。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000440. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Exploring perceptions of group antenatal Care in Urban India: results of a feasibility study.探索印度城市群体产前护理的认知:一项可行性研究的结果。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0498-3.
10
The WHO antenatal care randomised controlled trial: rationale and study design.世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验:原理与研究设计。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:27-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00006.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the community-level impact of group antenatal care on uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Atlantique Department, Benin, 2021-2023: a cluster randomized controlled trial.评估2021 - 2023年在贝宁大西洋省开展的群体产前护理对孕期疟疾间歇性预防治疗采用率的社区层面影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Malar J. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05412-8.
2
Facilitated group care for maternal and child health model fidelity: A scoping review.母婴健康模式保真度的促进性团体护理:一项范围综述。
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2517788. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2517788. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
Improving respectful maternity care through group antenatal care: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过小组产前护理改善尊重孕产妇的护理:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Midwifery. 2025 Aug;147:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104457. Epub 2025 May 10.
4
Feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of group antenatal care on the continuum of care and perinatal outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.撒哈拉以南非洲地区小组产前护理在连续护理及围产期结局方面的可行性、可接受性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0311473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311473. eCollection 2025.
5
Identifying health outcomes and future research directions of group antenatal care among adolescents in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.确定低收入和中等收入国家青少年群体产前护理的健康结果及未来研究方向:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 13;10(3):e017961. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017961.
6
Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Group Antenatal Care at the health post level on continuation in antenatal care and facility based delivery in Ethiopia using a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design: Study protocol.采用整群随机阶梯式楔形设计评估埃塞俄比亚卫生所层面的小组产前保健对产前保健持续率和机构分娩率的可行性、可接受性及影响:研究方案
Gates Open Res. 2025 Jan 31;8:29. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care.印度私营部门的群体产前护理启动项目:提高护理质量的实施历程。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Nov 1;7(4):191-196. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-5. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Improving respectful maternity care through group antenatal care: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过小组产前护理改善孕产妇尊严护理:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 18:rs.3.rs-3682833. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682833/v1.
9
Adapting group care to the postpartum period using a human-centered design approach in Malawi.马拉维采用以人为中心的设计方法将小组护理适应于产后阶段。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):1098. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10036-2.
10
Evaluation of implementation outcomes of an integrated group postpartum and well-child care model at clinics in Malawi.马拉维诊所中整合的产后和儿童保健综合小组模式实施效果评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05545-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Group antenatal care versus standard antenatal care and effect on mean gestational age at birth in Rwanda: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.卢旺达群组产前护理与标准产前护理及其对出生时平均孕周的影响:一项整群随机对照试验方案
Gates Open Res. 2019 Sep 27;3:1548. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13053.1. eCollection 2019.
2
The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal.同伴的力量:尼泊尔农村群组产前护理的集群对照试验效果评估。
Reprod Health. 2019 Oct 22;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0820-8.
3
Impact of group antenatal care (G-ANC) versus individual antenatal care (ANC) on quality of care, ANC attendance and facility-based delivery: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial in Kenya and Nigeria.群组产前护理(G-ANC)与个体产前护理(ANC)对护理质量、ANC 就诊率和医疗机构分娩的影响:肯尼亚和尼日利亚的一项实用型整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 2;14(10):e0222177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222177. eCollection 2019.
4
Nurses' and midwives' experiences of providing group antenatal and postnatal care at 18 health centers in Rwanda: A mixed methods study.护士和助产士在卢旺达 18 个卫生中心提供群体产前和产后护理的经验:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219471. eCollection 2019.
5
Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences.卢旺达实施团体产前护理前后:对妇女经验的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0750-5.
6
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
7
Group versus individual antenatal and first year postpartum care: Study protocol for a multi-country cluster randomized controlled trial in Kenya and Nigeria.群体与个体产前及产后第一年护理:肯尼亚和尼日利亚多国整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Gates Open Res. 2019 Jul 4;2:56. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12867.2. eCollection 2018.
8
Increasing postpartum family planning uptake through group antenatal care: a longitudinal prospective cohort design.通过群体产前保健增加产后计划生育的参与度:一项纵向前瞻性队列设计。
Reprod Health. 2018 Dec 17;15(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0644-y.
9
Use of a Facilitated Group Process to Design and Implement a Group Antenatal and Postnatal Care Program in Rwanda.在卢旺达采用促进性小组流程来设计和实施一项产前和产后小组护理计划。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Sep 25;63(5):593-601. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12871.
10
The Mexican Experience Adapting CenteringPregnancy: Lessons Learned in a Publicly Funded Health Care System Serving Vulnerable Women.墨西哥适应“以孕妇为中心”模式的经验:在为弱势妇女提供公共资助医疗保健系统中汲取的教训
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Sep 10;63(5):602-10. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12891.

构建全球循证证据基础,以指导中低收入国家群体产前护理的政策制定和实施:全球群体产前护理协作组织的关键原则和研究框架建议。

Building a Global Evidence Base to Guide Policy and Implementation for Group Antenatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Key Principles and Research Framework Recommendations from the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative.

机构信息

Maternal and Newborn Health, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Health Behavior and Biological Science, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Sep;65(5):694-699. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13143. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13143
PMID:33010115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9022023/
Abstract

Evidence from high-income countries suggests that group antenatal care, an alternative service delivery model, may be an effective strategy for improving both the provision and experience of care. Until recently, published research about group antenatal care did not represent findings from low- and middle-income countries, which have health priorities, system challenges, and opportunities that are different than those in high-income countries. Because high-quality evidence is limited, the World Health Organization recommends group antenatal care be implemented only in the context of rigorous research. In 2016 the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative was formed as a platform for group antenatal care researchers working in low- and middle-income countries to share experiences and shape future research to accelerate development of a robust global evidence base reflecting implementation and outcomes specific to low- and middle-income countries. This article presents a brief history of the Collaborative's work to date, proposes a common definition and key principles for group antenatal care, and recommends an evaluation and reporting framework for group antenatal care research.

摘要

来自高收入国家的证据表明,小组产前护理作为一种替代服务提供模式,可能是改善护理提供和体验的有效策略。直到最近,关于小组产前护理的已发表研究并未反映来自低收入和中等收入国家的研究结果,这些国家在卫生重点、系统挑战和机遇方面与高收入国家不同。由于高质量证据有限,世界卫生组织建议仅在严格研究的背景下实施小组产前护理。2016 年,全球小组产前护理协作组织成立,作为在低收入和中等收入国家从事小组产前护理研究的研究人员分享经验和塑造未来研究的平台,以加速发展反映具体实施和结果的强大全球证据基础低收入和中等收入国家。本文介绍了协作组织迄今为止的工作简史,提出了小组产前护理的定义和关键原则,并为小组产前护理研究推荐了一个评估和报告框架。