Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Janssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lancet HIV. 2020 Oct;7(10):e688-e698. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30229-0.
Bioinformatically designed mosaic antigens increase the breadth of HIV vaccine-elicited immunity. This study compared the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a newly developed, tetravalent Ad26 vaccine with the previously tested trivalent formulation.
This randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1/2a study (TRAVERSE) was done at 11 centres in the USA and one centre in Rwanda. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 50 years, who were HIV-uninfected, healthy at screening based on their medical history and a physical examination including laboratory assessment and vital sign measurements, and at low risk of HIV infection in the opinion of study staff, who applied a uniform definition of low-risk guidelines that was aligned across sites. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to tetravalent and trivalent groups. Participants in tetravalent and trivalent groups were then further randomly assigned at a 5:1 ratio to adenovirus 26 (Ad26)-vectored vaccine and placebo subgroups. Randomisation was stratified by region (USA and Rwanda) and based on a computer-generated schedule using randomly permuted blocks prepared under the sponsor's supervision. We masked participants and investigators to treatment allocation throughout the study. On day 0, participants received a first injection of tetravalent vaccine (Ad26.Mos4.HIV or placebo) or trivalent vaccine (Ad26.Mos.HIV or placebo), and those injections were repeated 12 weeks later. At week 24, vaccine groups received a third dose of tetravalent or trivalent together with clade C gp140, and this was repeated at week 48, with placebos again administered to the placebo group. All study vaccines and placebo were administered by intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle. We assessed adverse events in all participants who received at least one study injection (full analysis set) and Env-specific binding antibodies in all participants who received at least the first three vaccinations according to the protocol-specified vaccination schedule, had at least one measured post-dose blood sample collected, and were not diagnosed with HIV during the study (per-protocol set). This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02788045.
Of 201 participants who were enrolled and randomly assigned, 198 received the first vaccination: 110 were in the tetravalent group, 55 in the trivalent group, and 33 in the placebo group. Overall, 185 (93%) completed two scheduled vaccinations per protocol, 180 (91%) completed three, and 164 (83%) completed four. Solicited, self-limiting local, systemic reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events were similar in vaccine groups and higher than in placebo groups. All participants in the per-protocol set developed clade C Env binding antibodies after the second vaccination, with higher total IgG titres after the tetravalent vaccine than after the trivalent vaccine (10 413 EU/mL, 95% CI 7284-14 886 in the tetravalent group compared with 5494 EU/mL, 3759-8029 in the trivalent group). Titres further increased after the third and fourth vaccinations, persisting at least through week 72. Other immune responses were also higher with the tetravalent vaccine, including the magnitude and breadth of binding antibodies against a cross-clade panel of Env antigens, and the magnitude of IFNγ ELISPOT responses (median 521 SFU/10 peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs] in the tetravalent group and median 282 SFU/10 PBMCs in the trivalent group after the fourth vaccination) and Env-specific CD4+ T-cell response rates after the third and fourth vaccinations. No interference by pre-existing Ad26 immunity was identified.
The tetravalent vaccine regimen was generally safe, well-tolerated, and found to elicit higher immune responses than the trivalent regimen. Regimens that use this tetravalent vaccine component are being advanced into field trials to assess efficacy against HIV-1 infection.
National Institutes of Health, Henry M Jackson Foundation for Advancement of Military Medicine and the US Department of Defense, Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, & Harvard, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Janssen Vaccines & Prevention.
生物信息学设计的嵌合抗原增加了 HIV 疫苗引发免疫的广度。本研究比较了新开发的四价 Ad26 疫苗与之前测试的三价配方的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性。
这是一项在美国 11 个中心和卢旺达 1 个中心进行的随机、平行组、安慰剂对照、双盲、1/2a 期研究(TRAVERSE)。合格的参与者为年龄在 18 至 50 岁之间的成年人,他们未感染 HIV,根据病史和包括实验室评估和生命体征测量在内的体检,以及根据研究人员的意见,认为他们感染 HIV 的风险较低,研究人员应用了统一的低风险指南定义,该定义在各地点之间保持一致。纳入的参与者按照 2:1 的比例随机分配到四价和三价组。四价和三价组的参与者随后按照 5:1 的比例进一步随机分配到腺病毒 26(Ad26)载体疫苗和安慰剂亚组。随机分组按地区(美国和卢旺达)分层,并根据赞助商监督下生成的计算机生成的时间表,使用随机排列的块进行分组。我们在整个研究过程中对参与者和研究人员进行了分组隐藏。在第 0 天,参与者接受第一剂四价疫苗(Ad26.Mos4.HIV 或安慰剂)或三价疫苗(Ad26.Mos.HIV 或安慰剂),12 周后重复注射。在第 24 周,疫苗组接受第三剂四价或三价疫苗和 C 群 gp140,第 48 周再次重复,安慰剂再次给予安慰剂组。所有研究疫苗和安慰剂均通过肌肉内注射在三角肌肌肉中给药。我们评估了至少接受过一次研究注射的所有参与者的不良事件(全分析集),以及至少按照方案规定的疫苗接种时间表接受过前三次接种、至少有一次测量的给药后血样采集、并且在研究期间未被诊断为 HIV 的所有参与者的Env 特异性结合抗体(方案规定集)。这项研究在 Clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02788045。
在 201 名已入组并随机分配的参与者中,198 名接受了第一次接种:110 名在四价组,55 名在三价组,33 名在安慰剂组。总体而言,185 名(93%)按方案完成了两次预定的接种,180 名(91%)完成了三次,164 名(83%)完成了四次。疫苗组的发热、自限性局部和全身反应以及不良事件发生率高于安慰剂组。方案规定集中的所有参与者在第二次接种后均产生了 C 群Env 结合抗体,四价疫苗接种后总 IgG 滴度高于三价疫苗接种后(四价组 10413 EU/mL,95%CI 7284-14886 与三价组 5494 EU/mL,3759-8029)。第三次和第四次接种后,滴度进一步增加,至少持续到第 72 周。四价疫苗还引起了其他免疫反应更高,包括针对跨群 Env 抗原的结合抗体的幅度和广度,以及 IFNγ ELISPOT 反应的幅度(四价组第四次接种后中位数为 521 SFU/10 外周血单个核细胞[PBMC],三价组中位数为 282 SFU/10 PBMC)和第三次和第四次接种后的 Env 特异性 CD4+T 细胞反应率。未发现预先存在的 Ad26 免疫的干扰。
四价疫苗方案通常是安全的,耐受性良好,并发现比三价方案引起更高的免疫反应。正在推进使用这种四价疫苗成分的方案进入现场试验,以评估其对 HIV-1 感染的疗效。
美国国立卫生研究院、Henry M Jackson 基金会、军事医学 advancement、美国麻省理工学院和哈佛大学、比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会、杨森疫苗和预防。