Suppr超能文献

CT 对肺腺癌的诊断性能:有和无三维卷积神经网络的放射科医生比较。

Diagnostic performance for pulmonary adenocarcinoma on CT: comparison of radiologists with and without three-dimensional convolutional neural network.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Institute for Datability Science, Osaka University, 2-8 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1978-1986. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07339-x. Epub 2020 Oct 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnostic performance for pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma among radiologists with and without three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN).

METHODS

Enrolled were 285 patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, n = 75), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA, n = 58), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IVA, n = 152). A 3D-CNN model was constructed with seven convolution-pooling and two max-pooling layers and fully connected layers, in which batch normalization, residual connection, and global average pooling were used. Only the flipping process was performed for augmentation. The output layer comprised two nodes for two conditions (AIS/MIA and IVA) according to prognosis. Diagnostic performance of the 3D-CNN model in 285 patients was calculated using nested 10-fold cross-validation. In 90 of 285 patients, results from each radiologist (R1, R2, and R3; with 9, 14, and 26 years of experience, respectively) with and without the 3D-CNN model were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Without the 3D-CNN model, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the radiologists were as follows: R1, 70.0%, 52.1%, and 90.5%; R2, 72.2%, 75%, and 69%; and R3, 74.4%, 89.6%, and 57.1%, respectively. With the 3D-CNN model, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the radiologists were as follows: R1, 72.2%, 77.1%, and 66.7%; R2, 74.4%, 85.4%, and 61.9%; and R3, 74.4%, 93.8%, and 52.4%, respectively. Diagnostic performance of each radiologist with and without the 3D-CNN model had no significant difference (p > 0.88), but the accuracy of R1 and R2 was significantly higher with than without the 3D-CNN model (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-CNN model can support a less-experienced radiologist to improve diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma without deteriorating any diagnostic performances.

KEY POINTS

• The 3D-CNN model is a non-invasive method for predicting pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma in CT images with high sensitivity. • Diagnostic accuracy by a less-experienced radiologist was better with the 3D-CNN model than without the model.

摘要

目的

比较有和没有三维卷积神经网络(3D-CNN)的放射科医生在肺浸润性腺癌诊断中的表现。

方法

共纳入原位腺癌(AIS,n=75)、微浸润腺癌(MIA,n=58)和浸润性腺癌(IVA,n=152)患者 285 例。该 3D-CNN 模型由 7 个卷积池化层和 2 个最大池化层以及全连接层组成,其中使用了批量归一化、残差连接和全局平均池化。仅对翻转过程进行扩充。根据预后,输出层由两个节点组成,用于两种情况(AIS/MIA 和 IVA)。使用嵌套 10 折交叉验证计算 285 例患者中 3D-CNN 模型的诊断性能。在 285 例患者中的 90 例中,根据每位放射科医生(R1、R2 和 R3;经验分别为 9、14 和 26 年)的结果,统计比较了有和没有 3D-CNN 模型的情况。

结果

无 3D-CNN 模型时,放射科医生的准确率、敏感度和特异度如下:R1 为 70.0%、52.1%和 90.5%;R2 为 72.2%、75%和 69%;R3 为 74.4%、89.6%和 57.1%。有 3D-CNN 模型时,放射科医生的准确率、敏感度和特异度如下:R1 为 72.2%、77.1%和 66.7%;R2 为 74.4%、85.4%和 61.9%;R3 为 74.4%、93.8%和 52.4%。有和没有 3D-CNN 模型时,每位放射科医生的诊断性能均无显著差异(p>0.88),但有 3D-CNN 模型时 R1 和 R2 的准确率明显更高(p<0.01)。

结论

3D-CNN 模型可以支持经验较少的放射科医生提高对肺浸润性腺癌的诊断准确性,而不会降低任何诊断性能。

关键点

• 3D-CNN 模型是一种非侵入性方法,可通过 CT 图像预测肺浸润性腺癌,具有较高的灵敏度。

• 有 3D-CNN 模型时,经验较少的放射科医生的诊断准确率优于无模型时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验