Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence.

INTRODUCTION

Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence.

METHODS

We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist ( = 0.02), but not for the attending radiologist ( = 0.15). Diagnostic confidence remained unchanged for both ( = 0.45). However, the DL model identified tiny MSU deposits that led to a change in diagnosis in two cases for the in-training radiologist and one case for the attending radiologist. In 3/3 of these cases, the diagnosis was correct when using DL.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.