Zhang Jiaxing, Li Xiaosi, He Rui, Zheng Wenyi, Kwong Joey Sum-Wing, Lu Ling, Lv Tianyi, Huang Rong, He Mei, Li Xiaoyan, Wang Xue, Fang Qin, Wei Lingyu, Liu Yang, Chen Shuya, Qin Xiaogai, Xie Juan
Department of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 8;11:575022. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.575022. eCollection 2020.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global health threat and leads to a huge challenge to infectious diseases (ID) treatment. To tackle AMR, regional 'Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs' (ASP) have been implemented in many countries. Due to insufficient clinical pharmacy resources, a major intervention mode of ASP in China is through clinical pharmacist-led consultation (CPC). The current study aims to prospectively evaluate this intervention and compare the effectiveness of CPC served by ID and non-ID clinical pharmacists.
We conducted a prospective and multicenter cohort study based on a regional registry database in 17 hospitals in Western China, including consecutive patients with ID between April 2017 and December 2019. Baseline characteristics including sex, age, liver and kidney function, comorbidity, infection severity were prospectively collected and recorded. The main exposure of interest was whether the attending physician adopted recommendations of the clinical pharmacist in the therapeutic scheme. The outcome was the infection effective response, assessed during day 3-7 after completing CPC. Multivariate analyses were performed by generalized linear mixed models.
A total of 2,663 ID patients were included in the final analysis according to the predesigned inclusion and exclusion criteria. The number of patients whose treatment followed and did not follow the pharmacists' suggestion was 2,529 and 134, respectively. CPC intervention could improve the ID patient prognosis in the context of other confounders controlled (()=1.838, 95%()=[1.212, 2.786]), and the effectiveness of CPC served by ID and non-ID clinical pharmacists might be equivalent (=0.958, 95%[0.740, 1.240]). Special consultation (=1.832, 95%[1.106, 3.035]) and surgical treatment of infectious sites (=1.380, 95%[1.039, 1.834]) had positive influences on the patient prognosis, while hypoalbuminemia (=0.694, 95%[0.523, 0.921]), liver dysfunction (=0.705, 95%[0.559, 0.889]), presence of high-risk factors (=0.775, 95%[0.613, 0.980]), and increased infection severity (=0.631, 95%[0.529, 0.753])were associated with a decrease in effective response rate, independently.
This study suggests that CPC is a promising pharmacist-led intervention to improve ID treatment, and it can achieve standardization among clinical pharmacists with different backgrounds by some measures. Policy/decision-makers should promote this intervention mode in developing countries or regions where there is an insufficient number of clinical pharmacists.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)是对全球健康的严重威胁,给传染病(ID)治疗带来巨大挑战。为应对AMR,许多国家已实施区域“抗菌药物管理计划”(ASP)。由于临床药学资源不足,中国ASP的主要干预模式是通过临床药师主导的会诊(CPC)。本研究旨在前瞻性评估这一干预措施,并比较由感染科和非感染科临床药师提供的CPC的有效性。
我们基于中国西部17家医院的区域登记数据库进行了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,纳入2017年4月至2019年12月期间连续的ID患者。前瞻性收集并记录包括性别、年龄、肝肾功能、合并症、感染严重程度等基线特征。主要关注的暴露因素是主治医师在治疗方案中是否采纳临床药师的建议。结局指标是在完成CPC后第3至7天评估的感染有效反应。采用广义线性混合模型进行多变量分析。
根据预先设计的纳入和排除标准,共有2663例ID患者纳入最终分析。遵循和未遵循药师建议的患者数量分别为2529例和134例。在控制其他混杂因素的情况下,CPC干预可改善ID患者的预后(()=1.838,95%()=[1.212,2.786]),并且由感染科和非感染科临床药师提供的CPC的有效性可能相当(=0.958,95%[0.740,1.240])。特殊会诊(=1.832,95%[1.106,3.035])和感染部位的手术治疗(=1.380,95%[1.039,1.834])对患者预后有积极影响,而低白蛋白血症(=0.694,95%[0.523,0.921])、肝功能障碍(=0.705,95%[0.559,0.889])、存在高危因素(=0.775,95%[0.613,0.980])以及感染严重程度增加(=0.631,95%[0.529,0.753])分别与有效反应率降低相关。
本研究表明,CPC是一种有前景的由临床药师主导的改善ID治疗的干预措施,并且通过一些措施可以在不同背景的临床药师中实现标准化。政策/决策者应在临床药师数量不足的发展中国家或地区推广这种干预模式。