Suppr超能文献

慢性主观性耳鸣的双峰疗法:眼动脱敏再处理疗法与耳鸣再训练疗法对比认知行为疗法与耳鸣再训练疗法的随机对照试验

Bimodal Therapy for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial of EMDR and TRT Versus CBT and TRT.

作者信息

Luyten Tine Roanna, Jacquemin Laure, Van Looveren Nancy, Declau Frank, Fransen Erik, Cardon Emilie, De Bodt Marc, Topsakal Vedat, Van de Heyning Paul, Van Rompaey Vincent, Gilles Annick

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department Translational Neuroscience, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 10;11:2048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02048. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To date, guidelines recommend the use of a stepped care approach to treat tinnitus. The current clinical management of tinnitus frequently consists of audiologic interventions and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Due to the high heterogeneity of the tinnitus population and comorbidity of tinnitus with insomnia, anxiety, and depression, these interventions may not be sufficient for every patient. The current study aims to determine whether a bimodal therapy for chronic, subjective tinnitus consisting of the combination of TRT and eye movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR) results in a clinically significant different efficacy in comparison with the prevailing bimodal TRT and CBT therapy.

METHODS

Patients were randomized in two treatment groups. The experimental group received the bimodal therapy TRT/EMDR and the active control group received the bimodal therapy TRT/CBT. Evaluations took place at baseline (T), at the end of the treatment (T), and 3 months after therapy (T). The tinnitus functional index (TFI) was used as primary outcome measurement. Secondary outcome measurements were the visual analog scale of tinnitus loudness (VAS), tinnitus questionnaire (TQ), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), hyperacusis questionnaire (HQ), global perceived effect (GPE), and psychoacoustic measurements.

FINDINGS

The TFI showed clinically significant improvement in both bimodal therapies (mean decrease 15.1 in TRT/CBT; < 0.001 vs. 16.2 in TRT/EMDR; < 0.001). The total score on the TQ, HADS, HQ, and VAS all demonstrated significant decrease after treatment and follow-up ( < 0.001) in the experimental and the active control group. GPE-measurements revealed that more than 80% (i.e., 84% in TRT/CBT vs. 80% in TRT/EMDR) of the patients experienced substantial improvement of tinnitus at follow up. Treatment outcome remained stable after 3 month follow-up and no adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Both psychotherapeutic protocols result in a clinically significant improvement for patients with chronic subjective tinnitus. No significant different efficacy was found for the TRT/EMDR treatment compared to the combination of TRT and CBT.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03114878. April 14, 2017.

摘要

引言

迄今为止,指南推荐采用逐步治疗法来治疗耳鸣。目前耳鸣的临床管理通常包括听力干预以及耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)或认知行为疗法(CBT)。由于耳鸣人群的高度异质性以及耳鸣与失眠、焦虑和抑郁的共病情况,这些干预措施可能并非对每个患者都足够有效。本研究旨在确定由TRT与眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)相结合组成的针对慢性主观性耳鸣的双模式疗法,与主流的双模式TRT和CBT疗法相比,是否会产生临床上显著不同的疗效。

方法

将患者随机分为两个治疗组。实验组接受双模式疗法TRT/EMDR,活性对照组接受双模式疗法TRT/CBT。在基线期(T0)、治疗结束时(T1)以及治疗后3个月(T2)进行评估。耳鸣功能指数(TFI)用作主要结局指标。次要结局指标包括耳鸣响度视觉模拟量表(VAS)、耳鸣问卷(TQ)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、听觉过敏问卷(HQ)、总体感知效果(GPE)以及心理声学测量。

结果

两种双模式疗法的TFI均显示出临床上的显著改善(TRT/CBT组平均下降15.1;P<0.001,TRT/EMDR组为16.2;P<0.001)。在实验组和活性对照组中,治疗及随访后TQ、HADS、HQ和VAS的总分均显著下降(P<0.001)。GPE测量显示,超过80%(即TRT/CBT组为84%,TRT/EMDR组为80%)的患者在随访时耳鸣有显著改善。3个月随访后治疗结局保持稳定,未观察到不良事件。

结论

两种心理治疗方案均使慢性主观性耳鸣患者在临床上有显著改善。与TRT和CBT联合治疗相比,TRT/EMDR治疗未发现显著不同的疗效。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT03114878。2017年4月14日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f6/7511540/ff1124ff198e/fpsyg-11-02048-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验