• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The general public's ability to operate automated external defibrillator: A controlled simulation study.公众操作自动体外除颤器的能力:一项对照模拟研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):238-245. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.006.
2
Effect of a low-cost instruction card for automated external defibrillator operation in lay rescuers: a randomized simulation study.低成本自动体外除颤器操作指导卡对非专业救援人员的影响:一项随机模拟研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(4):265-272. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.070.
3
Dispatcher assistance and automated external defibrillator performance among elders.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;8(10):968-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01096.x.
4
Automated external defibrillator use among the general population.
J Dent Educ. 2003 Dec;67(12):1355-61.
5
Automated external defibrillation training on the left or the right side - a randomized simulation study.左侧或右侧自动体外除颤训练——一项随机模拟研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 14;9:73-79. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S140220. eCollection 2017.
6
Public access of automated external defibrillators in a metropolitan city of China.中国一都市公共场所自动体外除颤器的使用情况。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Attitudes toward automated external defibrillator use in Japan.日本对自动体外除颤器使用的态度。
Resuscitation. 2008 Nov;79(2):288-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
Use of a geographic information system to identify differences in automated external defibrillator installation in urban areas with similar incidence of public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective registry-based study.使用地理信息系统识别城市地区院外心脏骤停发生率相似情况下自动体外除颤器安装的差异:一项基于回顾性登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 2;7(5):e014801. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014801.
9
How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial.随着时间推移,心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器技能的掌握情况如何?公众可获取除颤(PAD)试验的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):254-63. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.010. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
10
Mobile Versus Fixed Deployment of Automated External Defibrillators in Rural EMS.农村紧急医疗服务中自动体外除颤器的移动部署与固定部署
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Apr;30(2):152-4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1500014X. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the quality of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with two models of automated external defibrillators: a manikin-based randomized trial.两种自动体外除颤器模型在心肺复苏期间胸外按压质量的比较:一项基于人体模型的随机试验。
World J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;16(4):374-377. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.065.
2
Learning in a crisis moment: a randomized controlled trial in emergency bystander intervention.危机时刻的学习:急诊旁观者干预的随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jul 21;11(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01146-x.
3
Effect of a low-cost instruction card for automated external defibrillator operation in lay rescuers: a randomized simulation study.低成本自动体外除颤器操作指导卡对非专业救援人员的影响:一项随机模拟研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(4):265-272. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.070.
4
Improve Cardiac Emergency Preparedness by Building a Team-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Educational Plan.通过建立基于团队的心肺复苏术教育计划来提高心脏急救准备。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;10:895367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895367. eCollection 2022.
5
Paediatric defibrillation and the role of the layperson - Is it all in the voice?儿童除颤与非专业人员的作用——全都在于声音吗?
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 28;10:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100253. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Layperson's performance on an unconversant type of AED device: A prospective crossover simulation experimental study.非专业人员在不熟悉类型的自动体外除颤器设备上的操作表现:一项前瞻性交叉模拟实验研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(2):98-105. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Could mobile apps improve laypeople AED use?移动应用程序能否提高非专业人员使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的能力?
Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:159-160. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Public access of automated external defibrillators in a metropolitan city of China.中国一都市公共场所自动体外除颤器的使用情况。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Accuracy of instructional diagrams for automated external defibrillator pad positioning.教学图表对自动体外除颤器电极片定位准确性的影响。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.034. Epub 2019 May 5.
4
Correct AED electrode placement is rarely achieved by laypersons when attaching AED electrodes to a human thorax.当将自动体外除颤器(AED)电极贴附于人体胸部时,非专业人员很少能正确放置电极。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:e12-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Automated external defibrillators and defibrillation electrodes from major manufactures depict placement of the left apical defibrillation electrode poorly!各大制造商生产的自动体外除颤器和除颤电极对左心尖除颤电极放置位置的描述欠佳!
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:e11-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Improving bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Capability, opportunity and motivation.
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:A15-A16. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
7
2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary.2017 国际心肺复苏与紧急心血管急救科学共识及治疗推荐概述。
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:201-214. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Automated external defibrillation training on the left or the right side - a randomized simulation study.左侧或右侧自动体外除颤训练——一项随机模拟研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 14;9:73-79. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S140220. eCollection 2017.
9
Barriers and facilitators to public access defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review.公众获取除颤器在院外心脏骤停中的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Oct 1;3(4):264-273. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx023.
10
Bystander automated external defibrillator use and clinical outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.旁观者使用自动体外除颤器与院外心脏骤停后临床结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

公众操作自动体外除颤器的能力:一项对照模拟研究。

The general public's ability to operate automated external defibrillator: A controlled simulation study.

作者信息

Dong Xue-Jie, Zhang Lin, Yu Yue-Lin, Shi Shu-Xiao, Yang Xiao-Chen, Zhang Xiao-Qian, Tian Shuang, Myklebust Helge, Li Guo-Hong, Zheng Zhi-Jie

机构信息

School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):238-245. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.006.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.006
PMID:33014220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7517391/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) enable laypeople to provide early defibrillations to patients undergoing cardiac arrest, but scant information is available on the general public's ability to use AEDs. This study assessed the ability of laypeople to operate AEDs, the effect of a 15-minute training, and whether skills differed by age.

METHODS

From May 1 to December 31, 2018, a prospective simulation study was conducted with 94 laypeople aged 18-65 years (32 aged 18-24 years, 34 aged 25-54 years, and 28 aged 55-65 years) with no prior AED training. The participants' AED skills were assessed individually pre-training, post-training, and at a three-month follow-up using a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. The critical actions and time intervals were evaluated during the AED operating process.

RESULTS

Only 14 (14.9%) participants (eight aged 18-24 years, four aged 25-54 years, and two aged 55-65 years) successfully delivered defibrillations before training. AED operation errors were more likely to occur among the participants aged 55-65 years than among other age groups. After training, the proportion of successful defibrillations increased significantly (18-24 years old: 25.0% vs. 71.9%, <0.01; 25-54 years old: 11.8% vs. 70.6%, <0.01; 55-65 years old: 7.1% vs. 67.9%, <0.01). After three months, 26.1% of the participants aged 55-65 years successfully delivered defibrillations, which was significantly lower than that of participants aged 18-24 years (54.8%) and 25-54 years (64.3%) (=0.02). There were no differences in time measures among three age groups in each test.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of untrained laypeople cannot effectively operate AEDs. More frequent training and refresher courses are crucial to improve AED skills.

摘要

背景

自动体外除颤器(AED)使非专业人员能够对心脏骤停患者进行早期除颤,但关于普通公众使用AED能力的信息却很少。本研究评估了非专业人员操作AED的能力、15分钟培训的效果以及技能是否因年龄而异。

方法

2018年5月1日至12月31日,对94名年龄在18 - 65岁(18 - 24岁32人,25 - 54岁34人,55 - 65岁28人)且此前未接受过AED培训的非专业人员进行了一项前瞻性模拟研究。在培训前、培训后以及三个月随访时,使用模拟心脏骤停场景对参与者的AED技能进行单独评估。在AED操作过程中对关键操作和时间间隔进行评估。

结果

培训前只有14名(14.9%)参与者(18 - 24岁8人,25 - 54岁4人,55 - 65岁2人)成功进行了除颤。55 - 65岁的参与者比其他年龄组更易出现AED操作失误。培训后,成功除颤的比例显著增加(18 - 24岁:25.0%对71.9%;<0.01;25 - 54岁:11.8%对70.6%;<0.01;55 - 65岁:7.1%对67.9%;<0.01)。三个月后,55 - 65岁的参与者中有26.1%成功进行了除颤,这显著低于18 - 24岁(54.8%)和25 - 54岁(64.3%)的参与者(P = 0.02)。各测试中三个年龄组在时间指标上没有差异。

结论

大多数未经培训的非专业人员无法有效操作AED。更频繁的培训和复习课程对于提高AED技能至关重要。