• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过建立基于团队的心肺复苏术教育计划来提高心脏急救准备。

Improve Cardiac Emergency Preparedness by Building a Team-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Educational Plan.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;10:895367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895367. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.895367
PMID:35874986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9300942/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To design an innovative team-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) educational plan for multiple bystanders and evaluate whether it was associated with better teamwork and higher quality of resuscitation.

METHODS

The team-based CPR plan defined the process for a three-person team, emphasize task allocation, leadership, and closed-loop communication. Participants qualified for single-rescuer CPR skills were randomized into teams of 3. The teamwork performance and CPR operation skills were evaluated in one simulated cardiac arrest scenario before and after training on the team-based CPR plan. The primary outcomes were measured by the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) scale and chest compression fraction (CCF).

RESULTS

Forty-three teams were included in the analysis. The team-based CPR plan significantly improved the team performance (global rating 6.7 ± 1.3 vs. 9.0 ± 0.7, corrected < 0.001 after Bonferroni's correction). After implementing the team-based CPR plan, CCF increased [median 59 (IQR 48-69) vs. 64 (IQR 57-71%)%, corrected = 0.002], while hands-off time decreased [median 233.2 (IQR 181.0-264.0) vs. 207 (IQR 174-222.9) s, corrected = 0.02]. We found the average compression depth was significantly improved through the team-based CPR training [median 5.1 (IQR 4.7-5.6) vs. 5.3 (IQR 4.9-5.5) cm, = 0.03] but no more significantly after applying the Bonferroni's correction (corrected = 0.35). The compression depths were significantly improved by collaborating and exchanging the role of compression among the participants after the 6th min.

CONCLUSION

The team-based CPR plan is feasible for improving bystanders teamwork performance and effective for improving resuscitation quality in prearrival care. We suggest a wide application of the team-based CPR plan in the educational program for better resuscitation performance in real rescue events.

摘要

目的

设计一种创新的多人基础心肺复苏(CPR)教育计划,并评估其是否与更好的团队合作和更高质量的复苏相关。

方法

该基于团队的 CPR 计划定义了三人团队的流程,强调任务分配、领导力和闭环沟通。符合单人 CPR 技能条件的参与者被随机分为三人一组。在基于团队的 CPR 计划培训前后,在一个模拟心搏骤停场景中评估团队协作表现和 CPR 操作技能。主要结局指标通过团队紧急评估量表(TEAM)和胸外按压分数(CCF)进行测量。

结果

共有 43 个团队纳入分析。基于团队的 CPR 计划显著提高了团队表现(总体评分 6.7 ± 1.3 对 9.0 ± 0.7,经 Bonferroni 校正后 < 0.001)。实施基于团队的 CPR 计划后,CCF 增加[中位数 59(IQR 48-69)对 64(IQR 57-71)%,经校正后 = 0.002],而脱手时间减少[中位数 233.2(IQR 181.0-264.0)对 207(IQR 174-222.9)s,经校正后 = 0.02]。我们发现,通过基于团队的 CPR 培训,平均按压深度显著提高[中位数 5.1(IQR 4.7-5.6)对 5.3(IQR 4.9-5.5)cm, = 0.03],但经 Bonferroni 校正后不再更显著(校正后 = 0.35)。在第 6 分钟后,参与者通过协作和相互交换按压角色,按压深度显著提高。

结论

基于团队的 CPR 计划对于提高旁观者的团队协作表现是可行的,并且对于改善院前急救的复苏质量是有效的。我们建议广泛应用基于团队的 CPR 计划,以在实际救援事件中提高复苏表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/8883f537847c/fpubh-10-895367-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/8b616173c4bf/fpubh-10-895367-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/e9996119d002/fpubh-10-895367-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/8883f537847c/fpubh-10-895367-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/8b616173c4bf/fpubh-10-895367-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/e9996119d002/fpubh-10-895367-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6e/9300942/8883f537847c/fpubh-10-895367-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Improve Cardiac Emergency Preparedness by Building a Team-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Educational Plan.通过建立基于团队的心肺复苏术教育计划来提高心脏急救准备。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;10:895367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895367. eCollection 2022.
2
Tele-Instruction Tool for Multiple Lay Responders Providing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Telehealth Emergency Dispatch Services: Mixed Methods Study.远程医疗紧急调度服务中多名一线响应者提供心肺复苏术的远程指导工具:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e46092. doi: 10.2196/46092.
3
Optimal paramedic numbers in resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled study in a simulation setting.最佳急救员数量在院外心脏骤停患者复苏中的应用:模拟环境下的随机对照研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235315. eCollection 2020.
4
Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.面对面与虚拟现实培训对心肺复苏质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):328-335. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4992.
5
Effects of team leaders' position in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams on leadership behavior and team performance: A prospective randomized interventional cross-over simulation-based trial.心肺复苏团队中团队领导的职位对领导行为和团队表现的影响:一项前瞻性随机干预交叉模拟试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034235.
6
Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏中的团队合作和领导力。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 14;57(24):2381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.017.
7
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.旁观者心肺复苏质量:改善心脏骤停复苏的潜力。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e017930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017930. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Factors affecting team leadership skills and their relationship with quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.影响团队领导技能的因素及其与心肺复苏质量的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2617-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182591fda.
9
Verbal Motivation vs. Digital Real-Time Feedback during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Comparing Bystander CPR Quality in a Randomized and Controlled Manikin Study of Simulated Cardiac Arrest.口头激励与心肺复苏期间的数字实时反馈:模拟心搏骤停的随机对照假人研究中比较旁观者心肺复苏质量。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):377-387. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1757181. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
Interactive video instruction improves the quality of dispatcher-assisted chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests.交互式视频指导可提高模拟心脏骤停中调度员辅助仅胸外按压心肺复苏的质量。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):490-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819573a5.

引用本文的文献

1
Tele-Instruction Tool for Multiple Lay Responders Providing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Telehealth Emergency Dispatch Services: Mixed Methods Study.远程医疗紧急调度服务中多名一线响应者提供心肺复苏术的远程指导工具:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e46092. doi: 10.2196/46092.

本文引用的文献

1
Different Resting Methods in Improving Laypersons Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Reducing Fatigue: A Randomized Crossover Study.不同休息方法对提高非专业人员徒手心肺复苏质量及减轻疲劳的影响:一项随机交叉研究
Resusc Plus. 2021 Nov 12;8:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100177. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation.欧洲复苏委员会 2021 指南:复苏教育。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:388-407. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Updating Health Literacy for Healthy People 2030: Defining Its Importance for a New Decade in Public Health.
更新健康素养以实现 2030 年健康人群:为公共卫生新时代定义其重要性。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 6):S258-S264. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001324.
4
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.旁观者心肺复苏质量:改善心脏骤停复苏的潜力。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e017930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017930. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Implementation of a National 5-Year Plan for Prehospital Emergency Care in Singapore and Impact on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes From 2011 to 2016.新加坡实施国家 5 年院前急救计划及对 2011 至 2016 年院外心脏骤停结局的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 3;9(21):e015368. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015368. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第3部分:成人基础及高级生命支持:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Part 6: Resuscitation Education Science: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第6部分:复苏教育科学:2020美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S551-S579. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000903. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Effect of a real-time feedback smartphone application (TCPRLink) on the quality of telephone-assisted CPR performed by trained laypeople in China: a manikin-based randomised controlled study.一款实时反馈智能手机应用程序(TCPRLink)对中国受过培训的非专业人员实施电话辅助心肺复苏质量的影响:一项基于人体模型的随机对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e038813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038813.
9
The general public's ability to operate automated external defibrillator: A controlled simulation study.公众操作自动体外除颤器的能力:一项对照模拟研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):238-245. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.006.
10
Traditional versus blended CPR training program: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.传统心肺复苏术培训方案与混合式心肺复苏术培训方案的比较:一项随机对照非劣效性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67193-1.