Suppr超能文献

对于非过敏性鼻炎患者,检测针对屋尘螨主要变应原Der p的鼻特异性IgE并非预测鼻激发试验结果的可接受筛查试验。

Nasal specific IgE to Der p is not an acceptable screening test to predict the outcome of the nasal challenge test in patients with non-allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Santamaría Luis, Calle Ana, Tejada-Giraldo Biol Manuela, Calvo Victor, Sánchez Jorge, Cardona Ricardo

机构信息

Group of Clinical and Experimental Allergy (GACE), Clinic "IPS Universitaria", University of Antioquia, Cra 27 n 37 B sur 69 apto 510, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Sep 28;13(9):100461. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100461. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nasal specific IgE (NsIgE) is the most common marker to identify type-2 inflammation in local allergic rhinitis (LAR). However, the comparison of NsIgE in different types of rhinitis, its frequency in tropical countries, and its diagnostic performance for predicting the outcome of a nasal challenge test (NCT) has had limited study. The main objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic performance of NsIgE to (Der p) among different types of rhinitis and control subjects in a tropical population.

METHODS

We evaluated the frequency of NsIgE, systemic atopy (serum sIgE and Skin Prick Test), and nasal eosinophils, and we performed nasal challenge tests (NCTs) with Der p in 3 groups of patients; rhinitis without atopy (RWoA) (n = 25), rhinitis with atopy (RWA) (n = 25), and control subjects (n = 18).

RESULTS

NsIgE had a low sensitivity and specificity to predict a positive NCT in the RWoA group: 48% had NsIgE, but only 28% had a positive NCT. Among the RWA group 84% had NsIgE and 80% had a positive NCT; the association of NsIgE and positive NCT was high (>80%). In the control group 27.8% had NsIgE, but none had a positive NCT.

CONCLUSIONS

NsIgE performs poorly in predicting NCT results in patients with non-allergic rhinitis. More methodical investigations are needed in this complex area of rhinitis. In patients with allergic rhinitis, NsIgE was useful in predicting a positive nasal challenge, but not superior to the systemic atopic test.

摘要

目的

鼻特异性IgE(NsIgE)是识别局部过敏性鼻炎(LAR)中2型炎症的最常见标志物。然而,不同类型鼻炎中NsIgE的比较、其在热带国家的频率以及其对预测鼻激发试验(NCT)结果的诊断性能的研究有限。本研究的主要目的是探讨热带人群中不同类型鼻炎患者和对照受试者中NsIgE对(屋尘螨)的诊断性能。

方法

我们评估了NsIgE、全身特应性(血清sIgE和皮肤点刺试验)和鼻嗜酸性粒细胞的频率,并对3组患者进行了屋尘螨鼻激发试验(NCT);非特应性鼻炎(RWoA)(n = 25)、特应性鼻炎(RWA)(n = 25)和对照受试者(n = 18)。

结果

NsIgE对预测RWoA组NCT阳性的敏感性和特异性较低:48%的患者有NsIgE,但只有28%的患者NCT阳性。在RWA组中,84%的患者有NsIgE,80%的患者NCT阳性;NsIgE与NCT阳性的相关性较高(>80%)。在对照组中,27.8%的患者有NsIgE,但无一例NCT阳性。

结论

NsIgE在预测非过敏性鼻炎患者的NCT结果方面表现不佳。在这个复杂的鼻炎领域需要更系统的研究。在过敏性鼻炎患者中,NsIgE有助于预测鼻激发试验阳性,但并不优于全身特应性试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbc3/7522493/41166beaee45/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验