• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合生活方式干预中频繁进行体育活动小组课程的附加值:一项初级保健中的整群随机试验。

The added value of frequent physical activity group sessions in a combined lifestyle intervention: A cluster randomised trial in primary care.

作者信息

Berendsen Brenda A J, Hendriks Marike R C, Rutten Geert M, Kremers Stef P J, Savelberg Hans H C M, Schaper Nicolaas C

机构信息

Nutrition and Movement Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Maastricht University Campus Venlo, Venlo, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 11;20:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101204. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101204
PMID:33014696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7520428/
Abstract

Combined lifestyle interventions (CLIs) that target both physical activity (PA) and diet have been shown to improve PA and health of adults who are overweight; however, optimal amount of guidance remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of adding PA group sessions to a standard CLI in primary care in the Netherlands. 411 participants (BMI 34.5 ± 4.4 kg/m) in thirty locations were randomised into a one year CLI or CLI+. CLI comprised individual meetings with lifestyle coach (LSC) and physiotherapist, and group meetings with dietician. PA group sessions were added in CLI+. Primary outcome was minutes of moderate to vigorous PA per week. Secondary outcomes of PA, diet and cardiovascular risk factors (i.e. waist circumference, HbA1c and blood pressure) were evaluated after 12 and 24 months with multilevel analyses. Data were collected from 2010 to 2015. Significant between-group effects were only found for waist circumference, which was significantly lower at twelve months in the CLI+ group (p = 0.011), no other between-group differences were found. Several within-group changes were significant. After participating in the intervention, walking time increased with 83 ± 35 min/week and 100 ± 38 min/week, and BMI decreased with 0.7 ± 0.3 kg/m and 1.5 ± 0.3 kg/m in CLI and CLI+ respectively (p < 0.001). Diet, HbA1c and systolic blood pressure changed favourably in both groups. Adding PA group sessions did not elicit added, sustained benefits. A programme with individual meetings with LSC and physiotherapist, and group meetings with dietician can be sufficient to facilitate a healthy lifestyle and reduce cardiovascular risk factors in a population with overweight.

摘要

针对身体活动(PA)和饮食的综合生活方式干预(CLIs)已被证明可改善超重成年人的身体活动水平和健康状况;然而,最佳指导量仍不明确。本研究评估了在荷兰初级保健中,在标准CLIs基础上增加PA小组课程的效果。30个地点的411名参与者(BMI 34.5±4.4kg/m²)被随机分为为期一年的CLIs组或CLIs+组。CLIs包括与生活方式教练(LSC)和物理治疗师的单独会面,以及与营养师的小组会面。CLIs+组增加了PA小组课程。主要结局是每周中等至剧烈身体活动的分钟数。在12个月和24个月后,通过多水平分析评估身体活动、饮食和心血管危险因素(即腰围、糖化血红蛋白和血压)的次要结局。数据收集时间为2010年至2015年。仅在腰围方面发现了显著的组间效应,CLIs+组在12个月时腰围显著更低(p = 0.011),未发现其他组间差异。几个组内变化具有显著性。参与干预后,CLIs组和CLIs+组的步行时间分别增加了83±35分钟/周和100±38分钟/周,BMI分别降低了0.7±0.3kg/m²和1.5±0.3kg/m²(p < 0.001)。两组的饮食、糖化血红蛋白和收缩压均有有利变化。增加PA小组课程并未带来额外的持续益处。一个包括与LSC和物理治疗师单独会面以及与营养师小组会面的项目,可能足以促进超重人群的健康生活方式并降低心血管危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be6/7520428/ac5156dfbdee/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be6/7520428/ac5156dfbdee/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be6/7520428/ac5156dfbdee/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
The added value of frequent physical activity group sessions in a combined lifestyle intervention: A cluster randomised trial in primary care.联合生活方式干预中频繁进行体育活动小组课程的附加值:一项初级保健中的整群随机试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 11;20:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101204. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
3
A Digitally Enabled Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Loss: Pilot Study in a Dutch General Population Cohort.一种数字化支持的综合生活方式干预用于减肥:荷兰普通人群队列的试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 8;8:e38891. doi: 10.2196/38891.
4
The contribution of lifestyle coaching of overweight patients in primary care to more autonomous motivation for physical activity and healthy dietary behaviour: results of a longitudinal study.初级保健中对超重患者进行生活方式指导对增强身体活动和健康饮食行为的自主动机的作用:一项纵向研究的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 16;11:86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0086-z.
5
Evaluation of a combined lifestyle intervention for overweight and obese patients in primary health care: a quasi-experimental design.基层医疗中针对超重和肥胖患者的综合生活方式干预评估:一项准实验设计。
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):671-677. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw070. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
The implementation of the coaching on lifestyle (CooL) intervention: lessons learnt.生活方式辅导(CooL)干预的实施:经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4457-7.
7
The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation.初级保健中联合生活方式干预的实施与可持续性:混合方法过程评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Mar 17;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5.
8
9
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
10
A randomized trial of lifestyle intervention in primary healthcare for the modification of cardiovascular risk factors.一项在初级医疗保健中进行生活方式干预以改善心血管危险因素的随机试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(5):453-61. doi: 10.1080/14034940500489826.

引用本文的文献

1
Blended Care Intervention for Cancer Aftercare in General Practice Centers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.综合诊疗中心癌症后续护理的混合式照护干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 12;14:e64662. doi: 10.2196/64662.
2
Health-promotion interventions targeting multiple behaviors: A meta-analytic review of general and behavior-specific processes of change.促进健康的干预措施针对多种行为:一般和行为特定变化过程的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;150(7):798-838. doi: 10.1037/bul0000427. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
A Digitally Enabled Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Loss: Pilot Study in a Dutch General Population Cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
The Coaching on Lifestyle (CooL) Intervention for Overweight and Obesity: A Longitudinal Study into Participants' Lifestyle Changes.生活方式辅导(CooL)干预超重和肥胖:对参与者生活方式改变的纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040680.
2
Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.体育活动是否能减弱甚至消除久坐时间与死亡率之间的有害关联?一项针对超过 100 万男性和女性数据的综合荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1302-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
一种数字化支持的综合生活方式干预用于减肥:荷兰普通人群队列的试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 8;8:e38891. doi: 10.2196/38891.
4
GPs' views on the implementation of combined lifestyle interventions in primary care in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.荷兰全科医生对初级保健中联合生活方式干预措施实施的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 4;12(2):e056451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056451.
The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation.
初级保健中联合生活方式干预的实施与可持续性:混合方法过程评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Mar 17;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5.
4
Which activity monitor to use? Validity, reproducibility and user friendliness of three activity monitors.应使用哪种活动监测仪?三种活动监测仪的有效性、可再现性和用户友好性。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 24;14:749. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-749.
5
The contribution of lifestyle coaching of overweight patients in primary care to more autonomous motivation for physical activity and healthy dietary behaviour: results of a longitudinal study.初级保健中对超重患者进行生活方式指导对增强身体活动和健康饮食行为的自主动机的作用:一项纵向研究的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 16;11:86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0086-z.
6
Eight-year weight losses with an intensive lifestyle intervention: the look AHEAD study.强化生活方式干预的 8 年体重减轻效果:LOOK AHEAD 研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/oby.20662.
7
Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.医疗环境中的动机性访谈:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
Baseline predictors of maintenance of intervention-induced changes in physical activity and sitting time among diabetic and pre-diabetic patients: a descriptive case series.糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者干预引起的身体活动和久坐时间变化维持情况的基线预测因素:一项描述性病例系列研究
BMC Res Notes. 2013 May 8;6:190. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-190.
9
Minimal intensity physical activity (standing and walking) of longer duration improves insulin action and plasma lipids more than shorter periods of moderate to vigorous exercise (cycling) in sedentary subjects when energy expenditure is comparable.当能量消耗相同时,与较短时间的中等到剧烈运动(如骑车)相比,长时间的低强度体力活动(如站立和行走)更能改善久坐者的胰岛素作用和血浆脂质水平。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055542. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
10
Association of sedentary time with mortality independent of moderate to vigorous physical activity.久坐时间与中等到剧烈体力活动无关的死亡率的关联。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037696. Epub 2012 Jun 13.