• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病护理需求细分的患者就医旅程建模,以2型糖尿病为例

Modeling Patient Journeys for Demand Segments in Chronic Care, With an Illustration to Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Elkhuizen Sylvia G, Vissers Jan M H, Mahdavi Mahdi, van de Klundert Joris J

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

National Institute for Health Research/Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;8:428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00428. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00428
PMID:33014961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7493672/
Abstract

Chronic care is an important area for cost-effective and efficient health service delivery. Matching demand and services for chronic care is not easy as patients may have different needs in different stages of the disease. More insight is needed into the complete patient journey to do justice to the services required in each stage of the disease, to the different experiences of patients in each part of the journey, and to outcomes in each stage. With patient journey we refer to the "journey" of the patient along the services received within a demand segment of chronic care. We developed a generic framework for describing patient journeys and provider networks, based on an extension of the well-known model of Donabedian, to relate demand, services, resources, behavior, and outcomes. We also developed a generic operational model for the detailed modeling of services and resources, allowing for insight into costs. The generic operational model can be tailored to the specific characteristics of patient groups. We applied this modeling approach to type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Diabetes care is a form of chronic care for patients suffering diabetes mellitus. We studied the performance of T2D networks, using a descriptive model template. To identify and describe demand we made use of the following demand segments within the diabetes type 2 population: patients targeted for prevention; patients with stage 1 diabetes treated by their GP with lifestyle advice; patients with diabetes stage 2 treated by their GP with lifestyle advice and oral medication; patients with stage 3 diabetes treated by their GP with lifestyle advice, oral medication, and insulin injections; patients with stage 4 diabetes with complications (treated by internal medicine specialists). We used a Markov model to describe the transitions between the different health states. The model enables the patient journey through the health care system for cohorts of newly diagnosed T2D patients to be described, and to make a projection of the resource requirements of the different demand segments over the years. We illustrate our approach with a case study on a T2D care network in The Netherlands and reflect on the role of demand segmentation to analyse the case study results, with the objective of improving the T2D service delivery.

摘要

慢性病护理是实现具有成本效益和高效的医疗服务提供的重要领域。使慢性病护理的需求与服务相匹配并非易事,因为患者在疾病的不同阶段可能有不同的需求。需要更深入地了解患者的整个就医过程,以便公正地对待疾病每个阶段所需的服务、患者在就医过程每个部分的不同经历以及每个阶段的结果。我们所说的患者就医过程是指患者在慢性病护理需求领域内接受服务的“过程”。我们基于著名的唐纳贝迪安模型的扩展,开发了一个用于描述患者就医过程和提供者网络的通用框架,以关联需求、服务、资源、行为和结果。我们还开发了一个用于详细建模服务和资源的通用运营模型,以便洞察成本。该通用运营模型可以根据患者群体的特定特征进行定制。我们将这种建模方法应用于2型糖尿病(T2D)患者。糖尿病护理是为糖尿病患者提供的一种慢性病护理形式。我们使用描述性模型模板研究了T2D网络的绩效。为了识别和描述需求,我们利用了2型糖尿病人群中的以下需求细分:目标为预防的患者;由全科医生提供生活方式建议治疗的1期糖尿病患者;由全科医生提供生活方式建议和口服药物治疗的2期糖尿病患者;由全科医生提供生活方式建议、口服药物和胰岛素注射治疗的3期糖尿病患者;患有并发症的4期糖尿病患者(由内科专家治疗)。我们使用马尔可夫模型来描述不同健康状态之间的转变。该模型能够描述新诊断的T2D患者群体在医疗保健系统中的就医过程,并预测不同需求细分在多年内的资源需求。我们通过对荷兰一个T2D护理网络的案例研究来说明我们的方法,并反思需求细分在分析案例研究结果中的作用,目的是改善T2D服务的提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76a/7493672/e81637931355/fpubh-08-00428-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76a/7493672/839f1d371fda/fpubh-08-00428-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76a/7493672/e81637931355/fpubh-08-00428-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76a/7493672/839f1d371fda/fpubh-08-00428-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76a/7493672/e81637931355/fpubh-08-00428-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling Patient Journeys for Demand Segments in Chronic Care, With an Illustration to Type 2 Diabetes.慢性病护理需求细分的患者就医旅程建模,以2型糖尿病为例
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;8:428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00428. eCollection 2020.
2
Challenges to diabetes self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings in Mexico City: a qualitative descriptive study.墨西哥城资源匮乏环境下 2 型糖尿病成人患者进行自我管理的挑战:一项定性描述性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Aug 23;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1035-x.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
An Innovative Approach for Decision-Making on Designing Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes on Dutch Population Level Using Dynamic Simulations.利用动态模拟为荷兰人口层面设计生活方式项目以降低 2 型糖尿病风险的决策方法创新
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;9:652694. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.652694. eCollection 2021.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Identifying associations between health services operational factors and health experience for patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran.识别伊朗 2 型糖尿病患者健康服务运营因素与健康体验之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 31;21(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06932-0.
7
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Comorbidity network for chronic disease: A novel approach to understand type 2 diabetes progression.慢性病共病网络:一种理解 2 型糖尿病进展的新方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9
10
The relationship between context, structure, and processes with outcomes of 6 regional diabetes networks in Europe.欧洲6个区域糖尿病网络的背景、结构、过程与结果之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192599. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Through the eyes of the patients: a qualitative study of diabetes patients' experiences navigating the healthcare system.从患者的视角:一项关于糖尿病患者在医疗系统中就医经历的定性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 26;16:1588192. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1588192. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning Care Pathways Framework: A New Method to Implement, Learn, Replicate, and Scale up Care Pathways for and With the Patient.学习型护理路径框架:一种为患者并与患者共同实施、学习、复制和扩大护理路径的新方法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8517. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8517. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
The effectiveness, equity and explainability of health service resource allocation-with applications in kidney transplantation & family planning.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between context, structure, and processes with outcomes of 6 regional diabetes networks in Europe.欧洲6个区域糖尿病网络的背景、结构、过程与结果之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192599. eCollection 2018.
2
The effect of population aging on health expenditure growth: a critical review.人口老龄化对卫生支出增长的影响:一项批判性综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2013 May 15;10(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0280-x. eCollection 2013 Dec.
3
How to solve the cost crisis in health care.
卫生服务资源分配的有效性、公平性与可解释性——在肾移植与计划生育中的应用
Front Health Serv. 2025 May 15;5:1545864. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1545864. eCollection 2025.
4
Journey Through Healthcare of People With Complications of Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study of Lived Experiences.2型糖尿病并发症患者的医疗保健历程:一项关于生活经历的定性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 May 21;24(2):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7604. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
Benefits and limitations of business process model notation in modelling patient healthcare trajectory: a scoping review protocol.业务流程模型符号在建模患者医疗保健轨迹中的优势和局限性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 30;12(5):e060357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060357.
6
Definition and conceptualization of the patient-centered care pathway, a proposed integrative framework for consensus: a Concept analysis and systematic review.定义和概念化以患者为中心的护理路径,一个用于共识的拟议综合框架:概念分析和系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07960-0.
7
Identifying associations between health services operational factors and health experience for patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran.识别伊朗 2 型糖尿病患者健康服务运营因素与健康体验之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 31;21(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06932-0.
如何解决医疗保健中的成本危机。
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Sep;89(9):46-52, 54, 56-61 passim.
4
Network formation, governance, and evolution in public health: the North American Quitline Consortium case.公共卫生中的网络形成、治理和演变:北美戒烟热线联盟案例。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2011 Oct-Dec;36(4):315-26. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31820e1124.
5
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.通过捆绑支付整合医疗服务——来自荷兰的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
6
Do pathways lead to better organized care processes?路径是否通向更有条理的护理流程?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;15(5):782-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01068.x.
7
Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium.新千年中慢性病照护模式的相关证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75.
8
Patient journeys: the process of clinical redesign.患者就医过程:临床重新设计的流程
Med J Aust. 2008 Mar 17;188(S6):S14-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01668.x.
9
Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications--a discussion paper.整合照护:含义、逻辑、应用及影响——一篇讨论文件
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.67.
10
Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.2型糖尿病质量改进策略对血糖控制的影响:一项Meta回归分析
JAMA. 2006 Jul 26;296(4):427-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.4.427.