Maroni Tessa, Dawson Brian, Landers Grant, Naylor Louise, Wallman Karen
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Temperature (Austin). 2019 Jun 25;7(2):165-177. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2019.1631731.
The purpose of this study was to compare the separate and combined effects of two practical cooling methods (hand and torso) used prior to exercise on subsequent high-intensity cycling performance in heat. Ten trained male cyclists (V̇Opeak: 65.7 ± 10.7 ml.kg.min) performed four experimental trials (randomised within-subjects design) involving 30-min of pre-cooling (20-min seated; PRE-COOL, 10 min warm-up; PRE-COOL+WUP), while using a: (1) hand-cooling glove (CG); (2) cooling jacket (CJ); (3) both CG and CJ (CG+J); or (4) no-cooling (NC) control, followed by a cycling race simulation protocol (all performed in 35.0 ± 0.6°C and 56.6 ± 4.5% RH). During the 30-min of pre-cooling, no reductions in core (Tc) or mean skin temperature (Tsk) occurred; however, Tsk remained lower in the CJ and CG+J trials compared to NC and CG (p = 0.002-0.040, = 0.55-1.01). Thermal sensation ratings also indicated that participants felt "hotter" during NC compared to all other trials during both PRE-COOL and PRE-COOL+WUP (p = 0.001-0.015, = 1.0-2.19), plus the early stages of exercise (sets 1-2; p = 0.005-0.050, = 0.56-1.22). Following cooling, no differences were found for absolute Tc and Tsk responses between trials over the entire exercise protocol (p > 0.05). Exercise and cognitive (working memory) performance also did not differ between trials (p = 0.843); however, cognitive performance improved over time in all trials (p < 0.001). In summary, pre-cooling (20-min seated and 10-min warm-up) in heat did not improve subsequent high-intensity cycling performance, cognitive responses and associated thermoregulatory strain (Tc and Tsk) compared to control.
本研究的目的是比较运动前使用的两种实用冷却方法(手部和躯干)单独及联合作用对随后在高温环境下进行高强度骑行表现的影响。十名训练有素的男性自行车运动员(峰值摄氧量:65.7±10.7毫升·千克·分钟)进行了四项实验性试验(受试者内随机设计),包括30分钟的预冷(20分钟坐姿;预冷,10分钟热身;预冷+热身),同时使用:(1)手部冷却手套(CG);(2)冷却夹克(CJ);(3)CG和CJ两者(CG+J);或(4)无冷却(NC)对照,随后进行自行车比赛模拟方案(所有均在35.0±0.6°C和56.6±4.5%相对湿度下进行)。在30分钟的预冷期间,核心温度(Tc)或平均皮肤温度(Tsk)没有降低;然而,与NC和CG相比,CJ和CG+J试验中的Tsk仍然较低(p=0.002 - 0.040,效应大小=0.55 - 1.01)。热感觉评分还表明,在预冷和预冷+热身期间,与所有其他试验相比,参与者在NC期间感觉“更热”(p=0.001 - 0.015,效应大小=1.0 - 2.19),以及在运动的早期阶段(第1 - 2组;p=0.005 - 0.050,效应大小=0.56 - 1.22)。冷却后,在整个运动方案中,各试验之间的绝对Tc和Tsk反应没有差异(p>0.05)。各试验之间的运动和认知(工作记忆)表现也没有差异(p=0.843);然而,所有试验中的认知表现在一段时间内都有所改善(p<0.001)。总之,与对照组相比,在高温环境下进行预冷(20分钟坐姿和10分钟热身)并没有改善随后的高强度骑行表现、认知反应以及相关体温调节应激(Tc和Tsk)。