Discrepancy of Trial Rasp and Femoral Stem Relative Position Within the Femoral Canal of a Coated Tapered System: An Intraoperative, Intrapatient Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND

For a successful total hip arthroplasty, the final position of the trial rasp should be adopted by the femoral stem to achieve correct positioning. This study aimed to characterize the discrepancy of the stem and rasp position of a widely used dual-tapered straight stem with rectangular cross section that is known to have an oversized stem with respect to the rasp.

METHODS

The distances between the tip of the greater trochanter and the shoulder of the implant and rasp were measured on 39 intraoperatively acquired fluoroscopic image pairs. Leg-length discrepancy was also measured clinically before and after surgery.

RESULTS

A paired t-test showed a significant average protrusion of the femoral stem with respect to the final rasp position of 2.63 mm (standard deviation = 2.3 mm, < .001), while 88% of the cases had no leg-length discrepancy after surgery. The quantified stem protrusion was statistically significant but did not reach clinical relevance and was easily mitigated in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantified stem protrusion appears to be clinically manageable, as only 2 cases required attenuation of stem positioning: in one case by the use of a femoral head with a shorter neck and in the other case by rerasping the femoral bed. Neither case was associated with the most extreme differences in position of the stem with respect to the final rasp. In addition, the used stem shows good overall outcomes in other studies. It appears that factors other than stem and rasp position play a critical role to the surgeon and for total hip arthroplasty success.