• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较机器人辅助腹腔镜活体供肾切取术中髂内、阴道和脐静脉供体血管的提取。

Comparison of the iliac, vaginal and umbilical graft extraction in robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, UPEC, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil, France.

Department of Nephrology, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, UPEC, Créteil, France.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2783-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03462-y. Epub 2020 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03462-y
PMID:33015741
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare different extractions routes for robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy in terms of post-operative pain and renal function recovery.

METHODS

Live donor kidney transplantation data from our institution were reviewed from November 2011 to March 2017. Postoperative pain was estimated using cumulative painkillers consumption. Variables were compared between the 3 groups with ANOVA for continuous data, χ test for categorial data. A survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve assessing time to transplant recipient nadir was performed to compare the renal function recovery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three RLDN were performed (23 iliac, 23 vaginal and 17 umbilical extractions). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood lost, warm ischemia time, cumulative painkiller consumption and renal function recovery time. Postoperative complications for Umbilical, Vaginal and Iliac were, respectively, of 0, 3 and 1. No major difference was found between the 3 groups beside a slightly longer hospital stay in the iliac group.

CONCLUSION

Iliac incision might impact post-operative pain with a moderate but significant longer hospital stay. Vaginal extraction is an option when cosmetic outcomes present a real demand. The three options appeared to be safe and should be discussed with the patient in regard of the surgeon experience.

摘要

目的

比较机器人辅助活体供肾切除术不同的提取路径在术后疼痛和肾功能恢复方面的差异。

方法

回顾了 2011 年 11 月至 2017 年 3 月我院的活体供肾移植数据。术后疼痛通过累计止痛药消耗量来评估。采用方差分析比较连续变量,采用卡方检验比较分类变量。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线生存分析比较移植受者血肌酐最低点的时间,以评估肾功能恢复情况。

结果

共进行了 63 例 RLDN(23 例髂部、23 例阴道和 17 例脐部提取)。三组间手术时间、失血量、热缺血时间、累计止痛药消耗量和肾功能恢复时间无显著差异。脐部、阴道部和髂部的术后并发症分别为 0、3 和 1。除了髂部组的住院时间略长外,三组间无明显差异。

结论

髂部切口可能会导致术后疼痛,且会显著延长住院时间。当美容效果有实际需求时,阴道提取是一种选择。这三种方法似乎都是安全的,应根据外科医生的经验与患者进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the iliac, vaginal and umbilical graft extraction in robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.比较机器人辅助腹腔镜活体供肾切取术中髂内、阴道和脐静脉供体血管的提取。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2783-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03462-y. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy living donor nephrectomy: Technique and results of a monocentric retrospective series.机器人辅助腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:单中心回顾性系列的技术和结果。
Prog Urol. 2022 Jul;32(8-9):567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Introducing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy after Experience in Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Approach.在有手辅助后腹腔镜入路经验后引入机器人辅助腹腔镜供体肾切除术。
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2221-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.041. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
4
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.机器人辅助腹腔镜供体肾切除术与标准腹腔镜供体肾切除术:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2015 Dec;29(12):1334-40. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0213.
5
Comparative outcomes of open nephrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, and full laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donors.活体供者开放性肾切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术和全腹腔镜肾切除术的比较结果。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.026.
6
Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes Right Versus Left.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:右侧与左侧手术结果比较
Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2327-2332. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Comparison of Two Different Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy With Vaginal Extraction Techniques-A Single-Center Experience.两种不同腹腔镜供肾切除术联合经阴道取出技术的比较——单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.035.
8
Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy.三种不同活体供肾切除术方法的比较与前瞻性分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):23-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100005.
9
[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Study in donors and recipients from 155 cases].[机器人辅助腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:155例供体和受体的研究]
Prog Urol. 2019 Oct;29(12):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.08.263. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Initial Experience with the Use of a Robotic Stapler for Robot-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy.机器人辅助供体肾切除术应用吻合器的初步经验。
J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1054-1057. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0461. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy: a safe and efficient improvement.机器人辅助腹腔镜后腹腔镜供肾切除术:一种安全有效的改良方法。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 19;42(1):243. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04939-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术
Transplantation. 1995 Nov 15;60(9):1047-9.