• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两家门诊诊所中高频脊髓刺激的取出率

Explantation Rates of High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Two Outpatient Clinics.

作者信息

Wang Victor C, Bounkousohn Vickie, Fields Kara, Bernstein Clifford, Paicius Richard M, Gilligan Christopher

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Newport Beach Headache and Pain, Coast Pain Management, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):507-511. doi: 10.1111/ner.13280. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1111/ner.13280
PMID:33016570
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report the explantation rates of high frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients implanted with high frequency spinal cord stimulators over a 4-year period in two outpatient private practice clinics, from July 2015 through June 2019, using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method to estimate probabilities of implant survival over time.

RESULTS

The estimated median time to explantation was 3.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.1-3.7) [Correction added on 15 October 2020, after first online publication: The preceeding sentence was amended to reflect the estimated median time.]. The estimated probabilities of implant survival beyond 1, 2, and 3 years postimplantation were 88.4% (95% CI = 81.3-93.0%), 76.5% (95% CI = 67.8-83.2%), and 60.7% (95% CI = 50.2-69.6%), respectively. The minimum (i.e., known) cumulative percentages of patients explanted by 1, 2, and 3 years postimplantation were 11.1% (14/126), 22.2% (28/126), and 32.5% (41/126), respectively. 65.9% of patients in this study had prior neurostimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently, high frequency SCS technology has been demonstrated as more effective in treatment of lower- and leg-pain, compared to conventional low frequency SCS, in a 12-month randomized controlled trial (SENZA-RCT). Longer term results have yet to be published. In this study, we found that the explantation rate was much higher than expected, based on the prior studies demonstrating its efficacy. As the use of neuromodulation continues to grow, longitudinal data will be critical in understanding its long-term effects on treated patients.

摘要

目的

报告在实际应用中高频10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的取出率。

材料与方法

这是一项对2015年7月至2019年6月期间在两家门诊私人诊所接受高频脊髓刺激器植入的患者进行的回顾性研究,为期4年,采用Kaplan-Meier乘积限法估计植入物随时间存活的概率。

结果

估计取出的中位时间为3.5年(95%置信区间[CI] = 3.1-3.7)[2020年10月15日首次在线发表后添加的更正:前一句进行了修改以反映估计的中位时间。]。植入后1年、2年和3年以上植入物存活的估计概率分别为88.4%(95%CI = 81.3-93.0%)、76.5%(95%CI = 67.8-83.2%)和60.7%(95%CI = 50.2-69.6%)。植入后1年、2年和3年取出患者的最小(即已知)累积百分比分别为11.1%(14/126)、22.2%(28/126)和32.5%(41/126)。本研究中65.9%的患者曾接受过神经刺激。

结论

最近,在一项为期12个月的随机对照试验(SENZA-RCT)中,与传统低频SCS相比,高频SCS技术已被证明在治疗下肢疼痛方面更有效。长期结果尚未发表。在本研究中,我们发现基于先前证明其疗效的研究,取出率远高于预期。随着神经调节的使用持续增加,纵向数据对于了解其对治疗患者的长期影响至关重要。

相似文献

1
Explantation Rates of High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Two Outpatient Clinics.两家门诊诊所中高频脊髓刺激的取出率
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):507-511. doi: 10.1111/ner.13280. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.脊髓刺激治疗慢性难治性腰背和下肢疼痛患者的长期生活质量改善:来自 SENZA-RCT 的 12 个月结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2035-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激的植入取出率及医疗资源利用情况
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/ner.12567. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛:澳大利亚6个月临床经验
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):267-80.
5
Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months.10kHz脊髓刺激装置的取出术:对744例随访至少12个月患者的回顾性研究
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):499-506. doi: 10.1111/ner.13359. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Factors Contributing to Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain.导致慢性疼痛脊髓刺激治疗结果的因素。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jan;25(1):145-154. doi: 10.1111/ner.13515.
7
Spinal cord stimulator explantation for magnetic resonance imaging: a case series.用于磁共振成像的脊髓刺激器取出术:病例系列
Neuromodulation. 2015 Jun;18(4):285-8; discussion 288. doi: 10.1111/ner.12254. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Series of Patients With or Without Previous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.10kHz高频脊髓刺激治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征:有或无前脊髓刺激器植入患者的病例系列
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):289-294. doi: 10.1111/papr.12739. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Multicenter Retrospective Study of Neurostimulation With Exit of Therapy by Explant.关于通过取出装置终止治疗的神经刺激的多中心回顾性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2017 Aug;20(6):543-552. doi: 10.1111/ner.12634. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
The Evolving Role of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation as Salvage Therapy in Neurostimulation.高频脊髓刺激在神经刺激中的挽救治疗作用不断演变。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):706-713. doi: 10.1111/papr.12898. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary 3-Month Outcomes of a Double-Blind Randomized Prospective Study (The QUEST Study) Assessing Effectiveness and Safety of Novel High-Frequency Electric Nerve Block System for Treatment of Post-Amputation Pain.一项双盲随机前瞻性研究(QUEST研究)的3个月主要结果:评估新型高频电神经阻滞系统治疗截肢后疼痛的有效性和安全性。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 6;17:2001-2014. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463727. eCollection 2024.
2
Real-world outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: predictors of reported effect and explantation using a comprehensive registry-based approach.脊髓刺激的真实世界结果:基于综合注册研究方法的报告疗效及取出装置的预测因素
Pain Rep. 2023 Nov 15;8(6):e1107. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001107. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial.
ECAP 控制的闭环与开环 SCS 治疗慢性疼痛:EVOKE 双盲随机临床试验的 36 个月结果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):346-354. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104751.
4
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):168-192. doi: 10.1177/19322968221133795. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
The Challenge of Converting "Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome" Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment: A Real Life Retrospective Study.通过神经刺激适配器结合三维计算机化疼痛图谱评估,将脊髓刺激失败综合征转化为临床成功的挑战:以脊髓刺激重新编程作为挽救疗法的一项真实病例回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 5;11(1):272. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010272.
6
An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.用于难治性机械性慢性腰痛的植入式修复神经刺激器:一项随机假手术对照临床试验。
Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2486-2498. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002258.