• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10kHz脊髓刺激装置的取出术:对744例随访至少12个月患者的回顾性研究

Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months.

作者信息

Hagedorn Jonathan M, Lam Christopher M, D'Souza Ryan S, Sayed Dawood, Bendel Markus A, Ha Chris Thuc, Romero Joshua, Hall Morgan, Freeman Eric, Richardson Brian F, Hoelzer Bryan C

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):499-506. doi: 10.1111/ner.13359. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1111/ner.13359
PMID:33469972
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

High-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) has achieved analgesia superior to traditional SCS in a number of studies. However, there is concern regarding long-term outcomes of 10 kHz-SCS. Prior work has suggested that explant rates are higher with 10 kHz-SCS. Our primary objective was to determine the explant rate of 10 kHz-SCS in a large patient cohort from multiple centers followed for at least 12 months after implant surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who received a 10 kHz-SCS implant before July 1, 2019. We abstracted patient demographics, implant date, primary site of pain, implant indication, explant date, and reason for explant. A total of 744 patients were included in the study analysis.

RESULTS

Average age of the overall cohort was 65.53 years and 407 (54.7%) were women. Average follow-up for all patients was 793 days. There were a total of 76 explants (10.2%). The most common reason for explant was loss of efficacy, which accounted for 39 explants (51.3% of total explants, 5.2% of overall cohort). Female sex and radiculopathy as the SCS indication were associated with statistically significant decreased risk of 10 kHz-SCS explant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found 10 kHz-SCS explant rates to be similar to prior reported explant rates for traditional SCS devices. Patient-related factors including female sex and radiculopathy as the primary SCS indication may be protective factors against explantation.

摘要

目的

在多项研究中,高频10kHz脊髓刺激(10kHz-SCS)已实现优于传统脊髓刺激的镇痛效果。然而,人们对10kHz-SCS的长期效果存在担忧。先前的研究表明,10kHz-SCS的取出率更高。我们的主要目的是确定来自多个中心的大型患者队列中10kHz-SCS的取出率,这些患者在植入手术后至少随访12个月。

材料与方法

我们对2019年7月1日前接受10kHz-SCS植入的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。我们提取了患者的人口统计学信息、植入日期、疼痛的主要部位、植入指征、取出日期和取出原因。共有744名患者纳入研究分析。

结果

整个队列的平均年龄为65.53岁,女性有407名(54.7%)。所有患者的平均随访时间为793天。总共有76例取出(10.2%)。取出的最常见原因是疗效丧失,这占了39例取出(占取出总数的51.3%,占整个队列的5.2%)。女性以及神经根病作为脊髓刺激的指征与10kHz-SCS取出风险的统计学显著降低相关。

结论

我们发现10kHz-SCS的取出率与先前报道的传统脊髓刺激装置的取出率相似。与患者相关的因素,包括女性以及神经根病作为主要的脊髓刺激指征,可能是防止取出的保护因素。

相似文献

1
Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months.10kHz脊髓刺激装置的取出术:对744例随访至少12个月患者的回顾性研究
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):499-506. doi: 10.1111/ner.13359. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Therapy-Related Explants After Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of an International Retrospective Chart Review Study.脊髓刺激术后与治疗相关的取出装置:一项国际回顾性图表审查研究的结果
Neuromodulation. 2017 Oct;20(7):642-649. doi: 10.1111/ner.12642. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激的植入取出率及医疗资源利用情况
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/ner.12567. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Multicenter Retrospective Study of Neurostimulation With Exit of Therapy by Explant.关于通过取出装置终止治疗的神经刺激的多中心回顾性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2017 Aug;20(6):543-552. doi: 10.1111/ner.12634. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Less Pain Relief, More Depression, and Female Sex Correlate With Spinal Cord Stimulation Explants.脊髓刺激器取出与疼痛缓解减少、抑郁加重和女性性别相关。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Jul;23(5):673-679. doi: 10.1111/ner.13036. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Paresthesia-Based Versus High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective, Real-World, Single-Center Comparison.基于感觉异常与高频脊髓刺激:一项回顾性、真实世界、单中心比较研究。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jul 17. doi: 10.1111/ner.13497.
7
High-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a salvage therapy for failed traditional SCS: A narrative review of the available evidence.高频(10千赫)脊髓刺激(SCS)作为传统SCS失败后的挽救疗法:现有证据的叙述性综述
Pain Pract. 2023 Mar;23(3):301-312. doi: 10.1111/papr.13184. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Identifying Predictors for Early Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant at One and Two Years: A Retrospective Database Analysis.确定1年和2年时早期经皮脊髓刺激器取出的预测因素:一项回顾性数据库分析
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
9
Spinal cord stimulator explantation for magnetic resonance imaging: a case series.用于磁共振成像的脊髓刺激器取出术:病例系列
Neuromodulation. 2015 Jun;18(4):285-8; discussion 288. doi: 10.1111/ner.12254. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
The Evolving Role of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation as Salvage Therapy in Neurostimulation.高频脊髓刺激在神经刺激中的挽救治疗作用不断演变。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):706-713. doi: 10.1111/papr.12898. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Device Evaluation, Treatment, and Explantation Recommendations (DETER): Review and Best Practices for Managing Neuromodulation Device Infections.设备评估、治疗及取出建议(DETER):神经调节设备感染管理的综述与最佳实践
J Pain Res. 2025 Apr 23;18:2147-2161. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S509623. eCollection 2025.
2
Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Technology Recommendations.脊髓刺激器植入物取出与慢性疼痛:系统评价及技术建议
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 18;18:1327-1340. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S514732. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Acute Pain and Chronic Pain Related to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
脊髓刺激治疗与腰椎手术失败综合征相关的急性疼痛和慢性疼痛的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Oct 9;16(10):e71132. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71132. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial.ECAP 控制的闭环与开环 SCS 治疗慢性疼痛:EVOKE 双盲随机临床试验的 36 个月结果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):346-354. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104751.
5
Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study.脊髓刺激治疗老年患者失败性腰椎手术后综合征的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2023 May 9;2023:2136562. doi: 10.1155/2023/2136562. eCollection 2023.
6
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):168-192. doi: 10.1177/19322968221133795. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Neuromodulation Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.化疗引起的周围神经病变的神经调节疗法:一项系统综述。
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 7;10(8):1909. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081909.
8
Stimulation holiday rescues analgesia after habituation and loss of efficacy from 10-kilohertz dorsal column spinal cord stimulation.刺激假期可挽救10千赫兹背柱脊髓刺激习惯化和疗效丧失后的镇痛作用。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Aug 19;47(12):722-7. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103881.
9
An Advanced Practice Provider Guide to Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.《外周神经刺激高级实践提供者指南》
J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 7;15:2283-2291. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S370037. eCollection 2022.
10
An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.用于难治性机械性慢性腰痛的植入式修复神经刺激器:一项随机假手术对照临床试验。
Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2486-2498. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002258.