Meng Xiangyu, He Hongwei, Liu Peng, Gao Dezhi, Chen Yu, Sun Shibin, Liu Ali, Li Youxiang, Jin Hengwei
Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 30;12:647167. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.647167. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate whether a radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation (AVM) scale (RBAS) could be used to predict obliteration of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) supposed for combined endovascular embolization (EMB) and gamma knife surgery (GKS) treatment. bAVM patients who underwent GKS with or without previous EMB from January 2011 to December 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were categorized into a combined treatment group and a GKS group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the two groups. Pre-EMB and pre-GKS RBAS were assessed for every patient. Multivariate analysis was performed to find factors associated with complete obliteration in the combined treatment group. Survival analysis based on sub-groups according to RBAS was performed to compare obliteration rate and find cutoffs for appropriate treatment modalities. A total of 96 patients were involved, and each group comprised 48 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of obliteration rate (75.0 vs. 83.3%, = 0.174). Pre-EMB RBAS ( = 0.010) and the number of feeding arteries ( = 0.014) were independent factors associated with obliteration rate in the combined treatment group. For the combined treatment patients, sub-group analysis according to pre-EMB RBAS (score <1.0, 1.0-1.5, and >1.5) showed statistical difference in obliteration rate ( = 0.002). Sub-group analysis according to RBAS between the two groups showed that the obliteration rate of the GKS group is significantly higher than the combined group when RBAS >1.5 (47.4 vs. 66.7%, = 0.036). The RBAS is proposed to be efficient in predicting obliteration of bAVMs supposed to receive combined EMB and GKS treatment. Patients with RBAS >1.5 are inclined to be more suitable for GKS instead of the combined treatment.
为评估基于放射外科的动静脉畸形(AVM)量表(RBAS)是否可用于预测拟接受血管内栓塞(EMB)联合伽玛刀手术(GKS)治疗的脑动静脉畸形(bAVM)的闭塞情况。对2011年1月至2016年12月在本机构接受GKS治疗(无论是否曾接受过EMB)的bAVM患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为联合治疗组和GKS组。采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)对两组进行匹配。对每位患者评估EMB前和GKS前的RBAS。进行多因素分析以找出联合治疗组中与完全闭塞相关的因素。根据RBAS进行亚组生存分析,以比较闭塞率并找出合适治疗方式的临界值。共纳入96例患者,每组48例。两组在闭塞率方面无差异(75.0%对83.3%,P = 0.174)。EMB前RBAS(P = 0.010)和供血动脉数量(P = 0.014)是联合治疗组中与闭塞率相关的独立因素。对于联合治疗的患者,根据EMB前RBAS(评分<1.0、1.0 - 1.5和>1.5)进行亚组分析显示闭塞率有统计学差异(P = 0.002)。两组间根据RBAS进行亚组分析显示,当RBAS>1.5时,GKS组的闭塞率显著高于联合组(47.4%对66.7%,P = 0.036)。RBAS被认为可有效预测拟接受EMB联合GKS治疗的bAVM的闭塞情况。RBAS>1.5的患者更倾向于更适合接受GKS而非联合治疗。