Suppr超能文献

治疗2型糖尿病的中成药的疗效和安全性比较:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析方案

Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol.

作者信息

Li Jie, Zhao Sen, Huang Yanqin, Li Chuancheng, Li Bing, Xu Yunsheng

机构信息

First College of Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province.

Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Department, The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22564. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022564.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a major public health issue throughout the world, especially in developing countries. Notably, traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) are of great significance in the treatment of T2DM combined with conventional Western medicine therapy. However, there is a lack of comparison among all the current common TCPMs for treating T2DM. Therefore, this study intends to explore the efficacy and safety of different TCPMs against T2DM through the Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We will conduct a comprehensive and systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCPM for the treatment of T2DM in both Chinese and English databases published till August 2020. Two researchers will be responsible for screening eligible literature, extracting data, and assessing the risk of bias of included studies independently. Then, pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses will be conducted to assess all available evidence. In the end, data will be analyzed using STATA15.0 and WinBUGS1.4.3 software.

CONCLUSION

This study will compare the efficacy and safety of different TCPMs against T2DM in detail. Our findings will provide a reliable evidence for selecting clinical treatment program and guideline development of T2DM.

摘要

背景

目前,2型糖尿病(T2DM)的患病率已成为全球尤其是发展中国家的一个主要公共卫生问题。值得注意的是,中药专利药(TCPMs)在T2DM的治疗中与传统西药联合治疗具有重要意义。然而,目前所有治疗T2DM的常见TCPMs之间缺乏比较。因此,本研究旨在通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)探讨不同TCPMs治疗T2DM的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们将对截至2020年8月发表的中英文数据库中有关TCPM治疗T2DM的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行全面系统的检索。两名研究人员将负责独立筛选合格文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。然后,将进行成对荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析以评估所有可用证据。最后,将使用STATA15.0和WinBUGS1.4.3软件进行数据分析。

结论

本研究将详细比较不同TCPMs治疗T2DM的疗效和安全性。我们的研究结果将为T2DM临床治疗方案的选择和指南制定提供可靠依据。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
7. Diabetes Technology: .7. 糖尿病技术:。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.
2
Bayesian Decision Models: A Primer.贝叶斯决策模型:入门指南。
Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):164-175. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.037.
3
Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2 型糖尿病的微血管并发症。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(2):117-124. doi: 10.2174/1570161117666190502103733.
4
Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2 型糖尿病的大血管并发症。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(2):110-116. doi: 10.2174/1570161117666190405165151.
9
Network meta-analysis: an introduction for pharmacists.网状Meta分析:药剂师指南
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):942-947. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0656-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验