• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兽医服务中的共同生产式护理:对英国利益相关者观点的定性研究。

Co-Produced Care in Veterinary Services: A Qualitative Study of UK Stakeholders' Perspectives.

作者信息

Pyatt Alison Z, Walley Keith, Wright Gillian H, Bleach Emma C L

机构信息

Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.

Department of Animal Production, Welfare and Veterinary Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport TF10 8NB, UK.

出版信息

Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 1;7(4):149. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7040149.

DOI:10.3390/vetsci7040149
PMID:33019544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7712434/
Abstract

Changes in client behaviour and expectations, and a dynamic business landscape, amplify the already complex nature of veterinary and animal health service provision. Drawing on prior experiences, veterinary clients increasingly pursue enhanced involvement in services and have expectations of relationship-centred care. Co-production as a conceptualisation of reciprocity in service provision is a fundamental offering in the services sector, including human medicine, yet the role of co-production in veterinary services has been minimally explored. Utilising a service satisfaction framework, semi-structured interviews ( = 13) were completed with three veterinary stakeholder groups, veterinarians, allied animal health practitioners, and veterinary clients. Interview transcript data were subject to the qualitative data analysis techniques, thematic analysis and grounded theory, to explore relationship-centred care and subsequently conceptualise co-production service for the sector. Six latent dimensions of service were emergent, defined as: empathy, bespoke care, professional integrity, value for money, confident relationships, and accessibility. The dimensions strongly advocate wider sector adoption of a co-produced service, and a contextualised co-production framework is presented. Pragmatic challenges associated with integration of active veterinary clients in a practitioner-client partnership are evident. However, adopting a people-centric approach to veterinary services and partnerships with clients can confer the advantages of improved client satisfaction, enhanced treatment adherence and outcomes, and business sustainability.

摘要

客户行为和期望的变化,以及动态的商业环境,加剧了兽医和动物健康服务提供本就复杂的性质。借鉴以往经验,兽医客户越来越追求在服务中更多地参与,并期望得到以关系为中心的护理。共同生产作为服务提供中互惠性的一种概念化,是包括人类医学在内的服务部门的一项基本服务内容,但共同生产在兽医服务中的作用却很少被探讨。利用服务满意度框架,对兽医、动物健康相关从业者和兽医客户这三个兽医利益相关者群体进行了13次半结构化访谈。访谈转录数据采用定性数据分析技术、主题分析和扎根理论,以探索以关系为中心的护理,并随后为该部门概念化共同生产服务。出现了六个潜在的服务维度,定义为:同理心、定制护理、职业操守、性价比、信任关系和可及性。这些维度强烈主张该行业更广泛地采用共同生产服务,并提出了一个情境化的共同生产框架。将积极的兽医客户纳入从业者-客户伙伴关系中存在明显的实际挑战。然而,采用以人为本的方法提供兽医服务并与客户建立伙伴关系,可以带来提高客户满意度、增强治疗依从性和治疗效果以及业务可持续性等好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a71/7712434/ed87a3313b8a/vetsci-07-00149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a71/7712434/c7fdad6985c8/vetsci-07-00149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a71/7712434/ed87a3313b8a/vetsci-07-00149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a71/7712434/c7fdad6985c8/vetsci-07-00149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a71/7712434/ed87a3313b8a/vetsci-07-00149-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Produced Care in Veterinary Services: A Qualitative Study of UK Stakeholders' Perspectives.兽医服务中的共同生产式护理:对英国利益相关者观点的定性研究。
Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 1;7(4):149. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7040149.
2
Synergies between veterinarians and para-professionals in the public and private sectors: organisational and institutional relationships that facilitate the process of privatising animal health services in developing countries.公共和私营部门兽医与辅助专业人员之间的协同作用:促进发展中国家动物卫生服务私有化进程的组织和机构关系。
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Apr;23(1):115-35; discussion 391-401. doi: 10.20506/rst.23.1.1472.
3
Challenges facing the farm animal veterinary profession in England: A qualitative study of veterinarians' perceptions and responses.英格兰畜牧兽医行业面临的挑战:兽医认知与应对的定性研究
Prev Vet Med. 2016 May 1;127:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
4
Nurses' and clients' perspectives after engagement in the co-designing of solutions to improve provider-client relationships in maternal and child healthcare: a human-centered design study in rural Tanzania.护士与服务对象参与共同设计改善母婴保健中服务提供者与服务对象关系的解决方案后的观点:坦桑尼亚农村地区的一项以人为本的设计研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 2;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01808-0.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
'Care about my animal, know your stuff and take me seriously': United Kingdom and Australian clients' views on the capabilities most important in their veterinarians.“关心我的动物,精通业务并认真对待我”:英国和澳大利亚客户对兽医最重要能力的看法。
Vet Rec. 2018 Nov 3;183(17):534. doi: 10.1136/vr.104987. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
The future of veterinary communication: Partnership or persuasion? A qualitative investigation of veterinary communication in the pursuit of client behaviour change.兽医沟通的未来:合作还是劝服?一项关于追求客户行为改变过程中兽医沟通的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0171380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171380. eCollection 2017.
8
What makes a great clinical team? Stakeholder perspectives on the attributes of effective veterinary health care teams in Australia.是什么造就了一个优秀的临床团队?利益相关者对澳大利亚高效兽医医疗团队特质的看法。
Aust Vet J. 2019 Nov;97(11):424-432. doi: 10.1111/avj.12855.
9
Client satisfaction in equine veterinary practice: A structured review and qualitative synthesis.马匹兽医实践中的客户满意度:一项结构化综述与定性综合分析
Vet Rec. 2021 Nov;189(10):e640. doi: 10.1002/vetr.640. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of Interdisciplinary Working from the Perspective of the Society of Master Saddlers Qualified Saddle Fitters.从马鞍匠大师协会合格马鞍调整师的视角看跨学科合作的经验
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;14(4):559. doi: 10.3390/ani14040559.
2
Access to veterinary care: evaluating working definitions, barriers, and implications for animal welfare.获得兽医护理:评估工作定义、障碍及对动物福利的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jan 18;11:1335410. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1335410. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Online procurement of pet supplies and willingness to pay for veterinary telemedicine.宠物用品在线采购和对兽医远程医疗的支付意愿。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Aug;181:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105073. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
The Impact of a Negative Media Event on Public Attitudes Towards Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry.负面媒体事件对公众对红肉行业动物福利态度的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 3;10(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ani10040619.
3
Impact of Telemedicine on the Traditional Veterinarian-Client-Patient Relationship.
远程医疗对传统兽医-客户-患者关系的影响。
Top Companion Anim Med. 2019 Dec;37:100359. doi: 10.1016/j.tcam.2019.100359. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
4
The Dimensions of Pet-Owner Loyalty and the Relationship with Communication, Trust, Commitment and Perceived Value.宠物主人忠诚度的维度及其与沟通、信任、承诺和感知价值的关系。
Vet Sci. 2018 Nov 6;5(4):95. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5040095.
5
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
United Kingdom Veterinarians' Perceptions of Clients' Internet Use and the Perceived Impact on the Client-Vet Relationship.英国兽医对客户互联网使用情况的看法以及对客户与兽医关系的感知影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Oct 19;4:180. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00180. eCollection 2017.
7
"Seeing" the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of "Authenticity" in Co-production Comment on "Collaboration and Co-production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges".“看见”差异:可见性和行动作为合作生产中“真实性”标志的重要性 评“医疗保健知识的合作与共同生产:机遇与挑战”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):345-348. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136.
8
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.共同产生了什么?医疗保健中的知识、价值观和社会关系。
PLoS Biol. 2017 May 3;15(5):e2001403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403. eCollection 2017 May.
9
The future of veterinary communication: Partnership or persuasion? A qualitative investigation of veterinary communication in the pursuit of client behaviour change.兽医沟通的未来:合作还是劝服?一项关于追求客户行为改变过程中兽医沟通的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0171380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171380. eCollection 2017.
10
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.患者和工作人员作为医疗服务的共同设计者。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714.