Suppr超能文献

比较煤炭淘汰路径:英国和德国的不同转型

Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom's and Germany's diverging transitions.

作者信息

Brauers Hanna, Oei Pao-Yu, Walk Paula

机构信息

Workgroup for Economic and Infrastructure Policy (WIP), TU Berlin. Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Energy, Transportation, Environment, DIW Berlin. Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2020 Dec;37:238-253. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

Political decisions and trends regarding coal use for electricity generation developed differently in the UK and Germany, despite being subject to relatively similar climate protection targets and general political and economic conditions. The UK agreed on a coal phase-out by 2024. In Germany, a law schedules a coal phase-out by 2038 at the latest. This paper investigates reasons for the different developments and aims to identify main hurdles and drivers of coal phase-outs by using the Triple Embeddedness Framework. The comparative case study approach reveals that policy outcomes regarding coal consumption are deeply influenced by several actor groups, namely, coal companies, unions, environmental NGOs, and the government. The most discussed aspects of a coal phase-out in both countries are energy security concerns, whether coal is mined domestically, (regional) economic dependence, as well as the relative power of actors with vested interests in coal consumption.

摘要

尽管英国和德国面临相对相似的气候保护目标以及总体政治和经济状况,但两国在煤炭用于发电的政治决策和趋势发展有所不同。英国商定到2024年淘汰煤炭。在德国,一项法律规定最迟在2038年淘汰煤炭。本文通过使用三重嵌入性框架,研究了不同发展情况的原因,并旨在确定淘汰煤炭的主要障碍和驱动因素。比较案例研究方法表明,有关煤炭消费的政策结果受到几个行为主体群体的深刻影响,即煤炭公司、工会、环境非政府组织和政府。两国在淘汰煤炭方面讨论最多的方面包括能源安全担忧、煤炭是否在国内开采、(区域)经济依赖以及在煤炭消费方面既得利益行为主体的相对权力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d4/7527286/bc626b83ca46/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验