Brauers Hanna, Oei Pao-Yu, Walk Paula
Workgroup for Economic and Infrastructure Policy (WIP), TU Berlin. Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Energy, Transportation, Environment, DIW Berlin. Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2020 Dec;37:238-253. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Political decisions and trends regarding coal use for electricity generation developed differently in the UK and Germany, despite being subject to relatively similar climate protection targets and general political and economic conditions. The UK agreed on a coal phase-out by 2024. In Germany, a law schedules a coal phase-out by 2038 at the latest. This paper investigates reasons for the different developments and aims to identify main hurdles and drivers of coal phase-outs by using the Triple Embeddedness Framework. The comparative case study approach reveals that policy outcomes regarding coal consumption are deeply influenced by several actor groups, namely, coal companies, unions, environmental NGOs, and the government. The most discussed aspects of a coal phase-out in both countries are energy security concerns, whether coal is mined domestically, (regional) economic dependence, as well as the relative power of actors with vested interests in coal consumption.
尽管英国和德国面临相对相似的气候保护目标以及总体政治和经济状况,但两国在煤炭用于发电的政治决策和趋势发展有所不同。英国商定到2024年淘汰煤炭。在德国,一项法律规定最迟在2038年淘汰煤炭。本文通过使用三重嵌入性框架,研究了不同发展情况的原因,并旨在确定淘汰煤炭的主要障碍和驱动因素。比较案例研究方法表明,有关煤炭消费的政策结果受到几个行为主体群体的深刻影响,即煤炭公司、工会、环境非政府组织和政府。两国在淘汰煤炭方面讨论最多的方面包括能源安全担忧、煤炭是否在国内开采、(区域)经济依赖以及在煤炭消费方面既得利益行为主体的相对权力。