• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件层面预测酒精影响下的驾驶意图。

Event-Level Predictors of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Intentions.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):647-654. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.647.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2020.81.647
PMID:33028478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8076488/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol-impaired driving is a significant public safety concern and is highly prevalent among young adults. Considerable research has examined between-person predictors of alcohol-impaired driving, but there has been little research on factors that predict alcohol-impaired driving at the event level. This pilot/feasibility study was designed to identify within-person, event-level predictors of alcohol-impaired driving intentions in the natural environment using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) design.

METHOD

Thirty-six young adult, moderate drinkers (M age = 22.9 years; 72.2% female; M drinks per occasion = 3.2) were recruited from a university area to complete 2 weeks of EMA. They reported on their subjective levels of intoxication, perceived dangerousness of driving, and driving intentions during real-world drinking episodes. Breath alcohol concentrations were collected with a portable breath alcohol analyzer.

RESULTS

Event-level perceived danger and subjective intoxication most strongly predicted intentions to drive after drinking, such that higher perceived danger and intoxication predicted lower willingness to drive, after adjusting for baseline alcohol-impaired driving attitudes (ps < .001). When we accounted for perceived danger during drinking episodes at the event and person level, baseline attitudes were no longer predictive of willingness to drive. Higher event-level breath alcohol concentration also predicted lower willingness to drive (p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to demonstrate that event-level risks of alcohol-impaired driving can be collected during drinking episodes in the natural environment. Findings indicate that subjective perceptions of intoxication and risk more strongly predict alcohol-impaired driving intentions than objective intoxication. Findings also suggest that event-level perceptions of intoxication and driving risk may be fruitful targets for interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.

摘要

目的

酒后驾驶是一个严重的公共安全问题,在年轻人中尤为普遍。大量研究已经检验了个体间预测酒后驾驶的因素,但对预测个体在特定事件中酒后驾驶倾向的因素研究较少。本研究旨在采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)设计,在自然环境中识别个体内在的、特定事件的酒后驾驶意图预测因素。

方法

从大学区招募了 36 名年轻成年适度饮酒者(M 年龄=22.9 岁;72.2%为女性;M 每次饮酒量=3.2 单位),完成了 2 周的 EMA。他们在真实饮酒场景中报告自己的醉酒程度、驾驶危险感知和驾驶意图。使用便携式呼气酒精分析仪收集呼气酒精浓度。

结果

特定事件的感知危险和主观醉酒程度最能预测酒后驾驶意图,即感知危险和醉酒程度越高,表明酒后驾驶意愿越低,在调整了酒后驾驶态度的基线值后(p<0.001)。当我们在特定事件和个体水平上考虑了饮酒期间的感知危险时,基线态度不再是驾驶意愿的预测因素。较高的特定事件呼气酒精浓度也预示着较低的驾驶意愿(p=0.003)。

结论

本研究首次证明,在自然环境中,在饮酒事件期间可以收集到酒后驾驶的特定事件风险。研究结果表明,与客观醉酒程度相比,主观醉酒感知和风险感知更能预测酒后驾驶意图。研究结果还表明,特定事件的醉酒和驾驶风险感知可能是减少酒后驾驶的干预措施的有价值目标。

相似文献

1
Event-Level Predictors of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Intentions.事件层面预测酒精影响下的驾驶意图。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):647-654. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.647.
2
Perceived danger while intoxicated uniquely contributes to driving after drinking.醉酒时感知到的危险是酒后驾车的独特成因。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Feb;38(2):521-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12252. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
3
Context, acute tolerance, and subjective response affect alcohol-impaired driving decisions.语境、急性耐受和主观反应会影响酒后驾驶决策。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3603-3614. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05639-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Combined Use of Alcohol and Energy Drinks Increases Participation in High-Risk Drinking and Driving Behaviors Among College Students.酒精与能量饮料混合饮用会增加大学生参与高风险酒后驾车行为的几率。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jul;76(4):615-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.615.
5
Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.利用移动技术影响对酒后驾驶风险的认知和决策。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Feb;38(1):47-55. doi: 10.1037/adb0000929. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Decision strategies while intoxicated relate to alcohol-impaired driving attitudes and intentions.醉酒时的决策策略与酒后驾驶态度和意图有关。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Nov;36(7):895-905. doi: 10.1037/adb0000808. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Event-level associations between objective and subjective alcohol intoxication and driving after drinking across the college years.在整个大学期间,客观和主观醉酒程度与酒后驾车之间的事件水平关联。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Sep;26(3):384-92. doi: 10.1037/a0024275. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Intervening to decrease the probability of alcohol-impaired driving: Impact of novel field sobriety tests.干预以降低酒后驾车的可能性:新型现场清醒度测试的影响。
J Prev Interv Community. 2016 Jul-Sep;44(3):199-212. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2016.1166817.
9
Drinking and driving in southeastern Brazil: results from a roadside survey study.巴西东南部的酒后驾车问题:一项路边调查研究的结果。
Addict Behav. 2013 Jan;38(1):1442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Age of first intoxication, heavy drinking, driving after drinking and risk of unintentional injury among U.S. college students.美国大学生首次醉酒年龄、酗酒、酒后驾车及意外伤害风险
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Jan;64(1):23-31. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.23.

引用本文的文献

1
Unplanned drinking predicts alcohol-impaired driving cognitions and behavior in daily life.无计划饮酒可预测日常生活中酒精影响下的驾驶认知及行为。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1037/adb0001093.
2
Event-level influences of alcohol, cannabis, and simultaneous use on perceived driving risk.酒精、大麻及同时使用对感知驾驶风险的事件层面影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr;33(2):170-177. doi: 10.1037/pha0000758. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
3
Acute activation of hemichannels by ethanol leads to Ca-dependent gliotransmitter release in astrocytes.乙醇对半通道的急性激活会导致星形胶质细胞中依赖钙的神经胶质递质释放。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Jun 21;12:1422978. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1422978. eCollection 2024.
4
Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Evaluate Alcohol Use with American Indian Women.使用生态瞬时评估评估美国印第安妇女饮酒的可行性和可接受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 7;20(12):6071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126071.
5
Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.利用移动技术影响对酒后驾驶风险的认知和决策。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Feb;38(1):47-55. doi: 10.1037/adb0000929. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
A randomized pilot trial of a mobile phone-based brief intervention with personalized feedback and interactive text messaging to reduce driving after cannabis use and riding with a cannabis impaired driver.一项基于手机的简短干预措施的随机试点试验,该措施提供个性化反馈和互动短信,以减少大麻使用后的驾驶行为和与大麻影响的司机一起乘车。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Nov;142:108867. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108867. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Decision strategies while intoxicated relate to alcohol-impaired driving attitudes and intentions.醉酒时的决策策略与酒后驾驶态度和意图有关。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Nov;36(7):895-905. doi: 10.1037/adb0000808. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Understanding ethanol's acute effects on medial prefrontal cortex neural activity using state-space approaches.采用状态空间方法理解乙醇对前额叶皮质中部神经活动的急性影响。
Neuropharmacology. 2021 Oct 15;198:108780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108780. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Context, acute tolerance, and subjective response affect alcohol-impaired driving decisions.语境、急性耐受和主观反应会影响酒后驾驶决策。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3603-3614. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05639-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Within-person variability in sensation-seeking during daily life: Positive associations with alcohol use and self-defined risky behaviors.个体内日常生活中寻求刺激的变异性:与饮酒和自我定义的危险行为呈正相关。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Mar;34(2):257-268. doi: 10.1037/adb0000535. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
Examining the ecological validity of the prototype willingness model for adolescent and young adult alcohol use.考察青少年和年轻成人酒精使用原型意愿模型的生态有效性。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Mar;34(2):293-302. doi: 10.1037/adb0000533. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Acute behavioral tolerance to alcohol.急性酒精行为耐受。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;28(1):112-129. doi: 10.1037/pha0000296.
4
Assessment of Alcohol Use in the Natural Environment.自然环境中酒精使用评估。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr;43(4):564-577. doi: 10.1111/acer.13975. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: a meta-analysis.物质使用者中符合生态瞬时评估方案的情况:一项荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):609-619. doi: 10.1111/add.14503. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
A Mobile Phone-Based Brief Intervention With Personalized Feedback and Text Messaging Is Associated With Reductions in Driving After Drinking Among College Drinkers.基于手机的简短干预措施,结合个性化反馈和短信,与减少大学生酒后驾车行为有关。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Sep;79(5):710-719. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.710.
7
The accuracy and promise of personal breathalysers for research: Steps toward a cost-effective reliable measure of alcohol intoxication?用于研究的个人呼气酒精检测仪的准确性与前景:迈向一种经济高效且可靠的酒精中毒测量方法的步骤?
Digit Health. 2017 Dec 20;3:2055207617746752. doi: 10.1177/2055207617746752. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
8
The Quality and Accuracy of Mobile Apps to Prevent Driving After Drinking Alcohol.用于防止酒后驾车的移动应用程序的质量和准确性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 8;4(3):e98. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5961.
9
Drivers who self-estimate lower blood alcohol concentrations are riskier drivers after drinking.自我估计血液酒精浓度较低的司机在饮酒后驾车风险更高。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(8):1387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4233-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
Contextual influences on subjective and behavioral responses to alcohol.情境对酒精主观及行为反应的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;23(1):59-70. doi: 10.1037/a0038760.