Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr;43(4):564-577. doi: 10.1111/acer.13975. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
The current article critically reviews 3 methodological options for assessing drinking episodes in the natural environment. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) typically involves using mobile devices to collect self-report data from participants in daily life. This technique is now widely used in alcohol research, but investigators have implemented diverse assessment strategies. This article focuses on "high-resolution" EMA protocols that oversample experiences and behaviors within individual drinking episodes. A number of approaches have been used to accomplish this, including using signaled follow-ups tied to drinking initiation, asking participants to log entries before and after individual drinks or drinking episodes, and delivering frequent signaled assessments during periods of the day when alcohol use is most common. Transdermal alcohol sensors (TAS) are devices that are worn continuously and are capable of detecting alcohol eliminated through the skin. These methods are appealing because they do not rely upon drinkers' self-report. Studies using TAS have been appearing with greater frequency over the past several years. New methods are making the use of TAS more tractable by permitting back-translation of transdermal alcohol concentration data to more familiar estimates of blood alcohol concentration or breath alcohol concentration. However, the current generation of devices can have problems with missing data and tend to be relatively insensitive to low-level drinking. An emerging area of research investigates the possibility of using mobile device data and machine learning to passively detect the user's drinking, with promising early findings. EMA, TAS, and sensor-based approaches are all valid, and tend to produce convergent information when used in conjunction with one another. Each has a unique profile of advantages, disadvantages, and threats to validity. Therefore, the nature of the underlying research question must dictate the method(s) investigators select.
本文批判性地回顾了评估自然环境中饮酒事件的 3 种方法选择。生态瞬间评估(EMA)通常涉及使用移动设备从日常生活中的参与者收集自我报告数据。该技术现在在酒精研究中得到广泛应用,但研究人员已经实施了多种评估策略。本文重点介绍了“高分辨率”EMA 协议,该协议对个体饮酒事件中的体验和行为进行了过度抽样。已经使用了多种方法来实现这一点,包括使用与饮酒开始相关的信号后续、要求参与者在单独饮酒或饮酒事件前后记录条目,以及在一天中最常见的饮酒时间频繁发送信号评估。透皮酒精传感器(TAS)是一种连续佩戴的设备,能够检测通过皮肤排出的酒精。这些方法很有吸引力,因为它们不依赖于饮酒者的自我报告。近年来,使用 TAS 的研究越来越频繁。新方法通过允许将透皮酒精浓度数据反向翻译为更熟悉的血液酒精浓度或呼气酒精浓度,使 TAS 的使用更加可行。然而,当前一代的设备可能存在数据缺失问题,并且往往对低水平饮酒的敏感度相对较低。一个新兴的研究领域正在研究使用移动设备数据和机器学习来被动检测用户饮酒的可能性,早期研究结果很有前景。EMA、TAS 和基于传感器的方法都是有效的,并且当彼此结合使用时往往会产生趋同的信息。每种方法都有独特的优缺点和对有效性的威胁。因此,基础研究问题的性质必须决定研究人员选择的方法。