Nissen Alexander, Berthelsen Mona, Dale Maria Teresa Grønning, Hansen Marianne Bang, Heir Trond
Division for Forced Migration and Disaster Research, Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Aug 11;11(1):1785249. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1785249.
A large body of research has shown that terrorism enhances fears and undermines perceived safety in a high proportion of both directly exposed individuals and individuals without any form of direct exposure (i.e. no geographical proximity to an attack). Some studies have further suggested that fear of terrorism may adversely affect health in those without direct exposure and that this may constitute an important public health burden because of the number who are indirectly exposed. Limited studies have investigated threat and safety perception after workplace terrorism and the possible consequences for employee health.
To explore whether perceived safety and threat in employees whose workplace was subjected to a terrorist attack are associated with subsequent sick-leave.
A longitudinal questionnaire survey on governmental employees' perceived safety and threat at work one (T1) and two (T2) years after the 2011 terrorist attack on the Norwegian ministries was linked to registry data on doctor-certified sick-leave for two 9-month periods following T1 and T2 (N = 1703).
There was fairly strong evidence (0.004 < < 0.034) that higher perceived safety was associated with a close to 30% reduction in sick-leave in fully adjusted models which included terror exposure and symptom-based PTSD. There was inconclusive evidence that lower perceived threat was associated with reduced sick-leave in the full models.
Reduced perceived safety in employees following workplace terrorism may have adverse health consequences of public health significance given how prevalent this perception seems to be. The study supports that post-terrorism response plans should include strategies on how to address the potentially large number of individuals suffering ill health after terror even if they were not directly exposed and do not meet criteria for PTSD.
大量研究表明,恐怖主义加剧了恐惧,并在很大比例的直接暴露个体和未经历任何形式直接暴露的个体(即与袭击地点没有地理上的接近)中破坏了他们的安全感。一些研究进一步表明,对恐怖主义的恐惧可能会对未直接暴露的个体的健康产生不利影响,而且由于间接暴露的人数众多,这可能构成一项重要的公共卫生负担。有限的研究调查了工作场所恐怖主义事件后的威胁和安全认知以及对员工健康可能产生的后果。
探讨工作场所遭受恐怖袭击的员工的安全感和威胁感是否与随后的病假有关。
对2011年挪威政府部门遭受恐怖袭击后1年(T1)和2年(T2)的政府雇员工作场所的安全感和威胁感进行纵向问卷调查,并将其与T1和T2之后两个9个月期间医生证明的病假登记数据相联系(N = 1703)。
有相当有力的证据(0.004< <0.034)表明,在包括恐怖暴露和基于症状的创伤后应激障碍的完全调整模型中,较高的安全感与病假减少近30%相关。在完整模型中,关于较低的威胁感与病假减少相关的证据尚无定论。
考虑到这种认知似乎很普遍,工作场所恐怖主义事件后员工安全感的降低可能会产生具有公共卫生意义的不良健康后果。该研究支持恐怖主义事件后的应对计划应包括如何应对恐怖事件后可能大量出现的健康不佳个体的策略,即使他们没有直接暴露且不符合创伤后应激障碍的标准。