• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道脱垂修补术后 5 年内手术失败和盆底症状恶化的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair.

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Downey, Downey, California; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; the Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and Social, Statistical, & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):933-941. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004092.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004092
PMID:33030871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7842362/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess independent risk factors for surgical failure and worsening pelvic floor symptoms within 5 years after vaginal prolapse surgery.

METHODS

This secondary analysis includes OPTIMAL (Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss) (n=374) and E-OPTIMAL (Extended) (n=285) trial participants. Surgical failure was defined as apical descent greater than one third of the total vaginal length, anterior or posterior vaginal wall past the hymen, subsequent surgery or bothersome vaginal bulge. Worsening pelvic floor symptoms were defined as increases from baseline as large as the minimally important difference for subscale scores of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: 11 for the Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory and 34.3 for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory. Outcomes were measured at 6 months then 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Chi-square and t test results from bivariate models and clinical relevance were used to inform final models.

RESULTS

Baseline risk factors for surgical failure were Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.17-3.15), perineal body (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.63), and pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28). Risk factors for worsening of pelvic floor symptoms were pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94) for worsening Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score, vaginal deliveries (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44) and pretreatment Urinary Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93) for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory score, and age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and pretreatment Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98) for worsening Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic ethnicity, larger preoperative perineal body, and higher pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores were risk factors for surgical failure up to 5 years after vaginal prolapse repair. Participants with higher baseline Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores were less likely to worsen. Risk factors for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory scores included more vaginal deliveries and increased age, respectively.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00597935, NCT01166373.

摘要

目的

评估阴道膨出手术后 5 年内手术失败和盆底症状恶化的独立危险因素。

方法

本二次分析包括 OPTIMAL(手术和盆底肌肉训练治疗顶端支撑丧失)(n=374)和 E-OPTIMAL(扩展)(n=285)试验参与者。手术失败定义为阴道顶端下降超过阴道总长度的三分之一、阴道前壁或后壁超过处女膜、随后进行手术或出现令人烦恼的阴道膨出。盆底症状恶化定义为与基线相比,盆底窘迫量表亚量表评分的最小有意义差异增加:尿失禁窘迫量表、肛肠窘迫量表为 11,盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表为 34.3。术后 6 个月、1、2、3、4 和 5 年测量结果。二变量模型的卡方和 t 检验结果及临床相关性用于确定最终模型。

结果

手术失败的基线危险因素为西班牙裔(调整比值比[aOR]1.92,95%置信区间[CI]1.17-3.15)、会阴体(aOR 1.34,95%CI 1.09-1.63)和术前盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表评分(aOR 1.16,95%CI 1.05-1.28)。盆底症状恶化的危险因素为术前盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表评分(aOR 0.75,95%CI 0.60-0.94)、阴道分娩(aOR 1.26,95%CI 1.10-1.44)和术前尿失禁窘迫量表评分(aOR 0.86,95%CI 0.80-0.93)。年龄(aOR 1.03,95%CI 1.01-1.05)和术前肛肠窘迫量表评分(aOR 0.95,95%CI 0.92-0.98)为肛肠窘迫量表评分恶化的危险因素。

结论

西班牙裔、更大的术前会阴体和更高的术前盆腔器官脱垂窘迫量表评分是阴道膨出修复后 5 年内手术失败的危险因素。基线盆底窘迫量表评分较高的患者不太可能恶化。尿失禁窘迫量表和肛肠窘迫量表评分恶化的危险因素分别包括更多的阴道分娩和年龄增长。

临床试验注册

NCT00597935,NCT01166373。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair.阴道脱垂修补术后 5 年内手术失败和盆底症状恶化的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):933-941. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004092.
2
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.Uterosacral 韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术联合或不联合围手术期行为疗法治疗盆腔器官阴道脱垂 5 年的手术结果和脱垂症状的影响:OPTIMAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
3
Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.经阴道手术入路与围手术期行为疗法治疗阴道顶端脱垂的比较:OPTIMAL 随机试验。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1023-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1719.
4
Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence.即刻术后盆腔器官脱垂定量测量与 2 年复发风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):792-801. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004043.
5
Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.经阴道雌激素辅助固有组织阴道顶端脱垂修复术的随机临床试验的 3 年结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):263.e1-263.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.042. Epub 2024 May 4.
6
Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.经腹式骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的长期疗效。
JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919.
7
Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).盆腔器官脱垂手术后压力性尿失禁症状的变化:一项全国性队列研究 (FINPOP)。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):909-919. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05760-0. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
8
Prevalence of urinary, prolapse, and bowel symptoms in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser 综合征患者的尿失禁、脱垂和肠道症状的患病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):70.e1-70.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
9
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life-a nationwide cohort study.盆腔器官脱垂手术与生活质量:一项全国性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):588.e1-588.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1285. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Hiatus and pelvic floor failure patterns in pelvic organ prolapse: a 3D MRI study of structural interactions using a level III conceptual model.盆腔器官脱垂中的裂孔和盆底功能障碍模式:一项使用三级概念模型对结构相互作用进行的三维磁共振成像研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;233(1):47.e1-47.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.011. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.术前盆底肌功能对盆腔器官脱垂手术治疗效果的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jan;35(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05653-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Association between oxidative balance score and urinary incontinence in females: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey in 2005-2018.氧化平衡评分与女性尿失禁的关联:来自 2005-2018 年全国健康与营养调查的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Sep;55(9):2145-2154. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03665-3. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.阴道子宫切除术加子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后外阴间隙增大与综合手术失败的关系。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 May 1;29(5):479-488. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001309. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.在一项骶棘韧带固定术联合移植物与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗女性的随机试验中,5 年内与复合手术失败相关的特征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):63.e1-63.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Behavioral and Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy Combined With Surgery vs Surgery Alone on Incontinence Symptoms Among Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence: The ESTEEM Randomized Clinical Trial.行为和盆底肌治疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗混合性尿失禁女性患者的尿失禁症状的效果:ESTEEM 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1066-1076. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12467.
2
Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.辅助后修补与固有组织顶点悬吊术成功的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):161.e1-161.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Models for Predicting Recurrence, Complications, and Health Status in Women After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.预测女性盆腔器官脱垂手术后复发、并发症和健康状况的模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;132(2):298-309. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002750.
4
Surgical Alteration of Genital Hiatus Size and Anatomic Failure After Vaginal Vault Suspension.阴道穹窿悬吊术后会阴部大小的手术改变和解剖学失败。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002593.
5
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.Uterosacral 韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术联合或不联合围手术期行为疗法治疗盆腔器官阴道脱垂 5 年的手术结果和脱垂症状的影响:OPTIMAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
6
Frailty and the Role of Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A National Study.衰弱与盆腔器官脱垂的闭塞性手术与重建性手术的作用:一项全国性研究。
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1502-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage and the Relationship to Genital Hiatus and Perineal Body Measurements.盆腔器官脱垂分期及其与生殖裂孔和会阴体测量值的关系。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov/Dec;22(6):497-500. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000323.
8
Quality of Life and Sexual Function 2 Years After Vaginal Surgery for Prolapse.阴道脱垂手术后2年的生活质量和性功能
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;127(6):1071-1079. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001442.
9
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review.盆腔器官脱垂及其复发的危险因素:一项系统综述。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1559-73. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Minimum important differences for scales assessing symptom severity and quality of life in patients with fecal incontinence.评估大便失禁患者症状严重程度和生活质量量表的最小重要差异。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):342-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000078.