Szlyk Hannah S, Tan Jia, Lengnick-Hall Rebecca
School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:657303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657303. eCollection 2021.
Technology is one medium to increase youth engagement, especially among underserved and minority groups, in suicide preventive interventions. Technology can be used to supplement or adjunct an in-person intervention, guide an in-person intervention, or be the stand-alone (automated) component of the intervention. This range in technological use is now called the continuum of behavioral intervention technologies (BITs). Overall, suicide intervention researchers do not use this terminology to categorize how the role of technology differs across technology-enhanced youth interventions. There is growing recognition that technology-enhanced interventions will not create substantial public health impact without an understanding of the individual (youth, families, and providers), mezzo (clinics and health systems of care), and contextual factors (society, culture, community) that are associated with their implementation. Implementation science is the study of methods to promote uptake of evidence-based practices and policies into the broader health care system. In this review, we incorporate work from implementation science and BIT implementation to illustrate how the study of technology-enhanced interventions for youth suicide can be advanced by specifying the role of technology and measuring implementation outcomes.
技术是提高年轻人参与度的一种媒介,尤其是在自杀预防干预措施中,提高服务不足群体和少数群体的参与度。技术可用于补充或辅助面对面干预、指导面对面干预,或成为干预措施的独立(自动化)组成部分。这种技术使用范围现在被称为行为干预技术(BITs)连续体。总体而言,自杀干预研究人员并未使用该术语来对技术在增强年轻人干预措施中的作用差异进行分类。人们越来越认识到,如果不了解与技术增强型干预措施实施相关的个体(年轻人、家庭和提供者)、中间层面(诊所和医疗保健系统)以及背景因素(社会、文化、社区),技术增强型干预措施就不会产生重大的公共卫生影响。实施科学是研究促进将循证实践和政策纳入更广泛医疗保健系统的方法的学科。在本综述中,我们纳入了实施科学和BIT实施方面的工作,以说明如何通过明确技术的作用并衡量实施结果来推进针对青少年自杀的技术增强型干预措施的研究。